A group of industrial designers suggested that the use of bamboo will be more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material as wood is
(a)will be more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material as wood is
(b)be more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material as wood
(c)be more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material as wood is
(d)is more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material as wood is
(e)be more widely introduced into production methodology as bamboo is as versatile a material than wood is
OA C
Source: Economist Gmat
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
A group of industrial designers suggested that the use of
This topic has expert replies
-
BTGmoderatorDC
- Moderator
- Posts: 7187
- Joined: Thu Sep 07, 2017 4:43 pm
- Followed by:23 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
-
deloitte247
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2214
- Joined: Fri Mar 02, 2018 2:22 pm
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
This is is still a language structure problem and requires a great deal of attention in order to answer the question correctly
Option A - Incorrect
This is no different from the question statement underlined above with no logical meaning aside the one stated in the original statement.
Option B - Incorrect
The statement is originally a suggestive assertion and not a directive assertion that "bamboo would be used" although there appear s a problem with the comparison of the wood material in terms of the sentence construction.
Option C - correct
This takes the form of the statement in option B above although it shows clearly a more powerful sentence construction than in B above. The comparison is apt and consistent.
Option D - Incorrect
This statement is assertive as it suggests that "bamboo" is already in use which is clearly against the writer's submission.
Option E - Incorrect
The statement here is in comparison of two materials and non of it is better than the other. It seeks to equate "bamboo" to "wood" which makes the option statement lacking the truth.
Option A - Incorrect
This is no different from the question statement underlined above with no logical meaning aside the one stated in the original statement.
Option B - Incorrect
The statement is originally a suggestive assertion and not a directive assertion that "bamboo would be used" although there appear s a problem with the comparison of the wood material in terms of the sentence construction.
Option C - correct
This takes the form of the statement in option B above although it shows clearly a more powerful sentence construction than in B above. The comparison is apt and consistent.
Option D - Incorrect
This statement is assertive as it suggests that "bamboo" is already in use which is clearly against the writer's submission.
Option E - Incorrect
The statement here is in comparison of two materials and non of it is better than the other. It seeks to equate "bamboo" to "wood" which makes the option statement lacking the truth.
