A regular polygon can be constructed with a compass and straightedge if its number of sides is either any power of 2, any product of the five distinct primes 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537, or the product of any power of 2 and any of the five distinct primes. Which of the following regular polygons is NOT constructable with a compass and straightedge?
A. A 15-sided regular polygon
B. An 18-sided regular polygon
C. A 48-sided regular polygon
D. A 51-sided regular polygon
E. A 60-sided regular polygon
OA is B
Above question is from veritas. What does "Any product of the five distinct primes 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537" really mean ?
A regular polygon can be constructed with a compass and
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi vinni.k,
We're told that a regular polygon can be constructed with a compass and straightedge IF its number of sides is either ANY power of 2, ANY PRODUCT of the five distinct primes 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537, or the PRODUCT of ANY power of 2 and ANY of the five distinct primes. We're asked which of the following regular polygons is NOT constructable with a compass and straightedge.
While this question is complex-looking, the math behind it is actually fairly simple (just multiplication) and we can use the Answers to our advantage. Once we find the one answer that we CANNOT get to based on the above 'restrictions', we can stop working. Let's start with Answer A...
Answer A: 15 sides
Can we get to 15 by multiplying any of the above numbers as described? Yes we can - if we take the product of 3 and 5, we'll get 15. Eliminate Answer A.
Answer B: 18 sides
Can we get to 18 by multiplying any of the above numbers as described? No we cannot; 18 can be prime factored into (2)(3)(3), but there's no way to get those pieces from the above list of numbers. Answer B must be the answer, so we can stop working.
For the sake of thoroughness, here's how you can get to the remaining three answers:
Answer C: 48 sides.... (3)(16) = (3)(2^4) = (3)(a power of 2)
Answer D: 51 sides.... (3)(17)
Answer E: 60 sides.... (3)(5)(4) = (3)(5)(2^2) = (3)(5)(a power of 2)
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
We're told that a regular polygon can be constructed with a compass and straightedge IF its number of sides is either ANY power of 2, ANY PRODUCT of the five distinct primes 3, 5, 17, 257, and 65537, or the PRODUCT of ANY power of 2 and ANY of the five distinct primes. We're asked which of the following regular polygons is NOT constructable with a compass and straightedge.
While this question is complex-looking, the math behind it is actually fairly simple (just multiplication) and we can use the Answers to our advantage. Once we find the one answer that we CANNOT get to based on the above 'restrictions', we can stop working. Let's start with Answer A...
Answer A: 15 sides
Can we get to 15 by multiplying any of the above numbers as described? Yes we can - if we take the product of 3 and 5, we'll get 15. Eliminate Answer A.
Answer B: 18 sides
Can we get to 18 by multiplying any of the above numbers as described? No we cannot; 18 can be prime factored into (2)(3)(3), but there's no way to get those pieces from the above list of numbers. Answer B must be the answer, so we can stop working.
For the sake of thoroughness, here's how you can get to the remaining three answers:
Answer C: 48 sides.... (3)(16) = (3)(2^4) = (3)(a power of 2)
Answer D: 51 sides.... (3)(17)
Answer E: 60 sides.... (3)(5)(4) = (3)(5)(2^2) = (3)(5)(a power of 2)
Final Answer: B
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I agree with you, regor60.regor60 wrote:The wording seems ambigous to me.
If you're permitted to use only one instance of a prime number in pairing it with a power of 2, the problem should say "any ONE of the distinct..."
Cheers,
Brent