Manhattan GMAT CAT- Length of Line DE

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:18 pm

Manhattan GMAT CAT- Length of Line DE

by Misterbuff » Tue Sep 23, 2008 5:39 pm
Hi everyone,

Please see the attached problem. After reading the explanation Manhattan GMAT provided, I still believe I am correct. I would appreciate it if someone out there is able to provide a better explanation or maybe support my answer (D).

Thanks.
Attachments
Manhattan GMAT CAT- Length of Line DE.JPG

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members
Misterbuff wrote:Hi everyone,

Please see the attached problem. After reading the explanation Manhattan GMAT provided, I still believe I am correct. I would appreciate it if someone out there is able to provide a better explanation or maybe support my answer (D).

Thanks.
I think the answer should be B.

Statement I

insufficient because it does not tell us anything about other angles.

Statement II

We can determine that both triangles are similar triangle.
therefore DE= 7

Whats the OA?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:18 pm

by Misterbuff » Tue Sep 23, 2008 6:47 pm
Hmm, I just took another look at the problem and I now agree with the answer. Thanks for the help!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 111
Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2007 11:00 pm
Thanked: 4 times

Re: Manhattan GMAT CAT- Length of Line DE

by nitin86 » Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:05 am
parallel_chase wrote:
Misterbuff wrote:Hi everyone,

Please see the attached problem. After reading the explanation Manhattan GMAT provided, I still believe I am correct. I would appreciate it if someone out there is able to provide a better explanation or maybe support my answer (D).

Thanks.
I think the answer should be B.

Statement I

insufficient because it does not tell us anything about other angles.

Statement II

We can determine that both triangles are similar triangle.
therefore DE= 7

Whats the OA?
@paralle_chase,

Stmt 1 does tell us about the angle A and B. Because CA and CB are the radius of the circle, that mean CA = CB = r. And in triangle, ABC, angle C = x = 60, hence, angale A and angle B is also 60 degree.

Also, by same logic, triangle ABC becomes similar to triangle BDE

Legendary Member
Posts: 1153
Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 6:21 am
Thanked: 146 times
Followed by:2 members
nitin86 wrote: @paralle_chase,

Stmt 1 does tell us about the angle A and B. Because CA and CB are the radius of the circle, that mean CA = CB = r. And in triangle, ABC, angle C = x = 60, hence, angale A and angle B is also 60 degree.
True
Also, by same logic, triangle ABC becomes similar to triangle BDE
False, you cant assume that DE = BE

We know that angle B is 60, but we dont know about angle D and angle E. Hence Insufficient.

Let me know if you think otherwise