If n is a prime number.........Manhattan question

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 712
Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
Thanked: 14 times
Followed by:5 members
If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n<x<x^(1/n)

(2)x^(n−1)>x^(2n−2)

Source: Manhattan

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Thu Jun 15, 2017 6:52 am
Mo2men wrote:If n is a prime number greater than 2, is 1/x > 1?

(1) x^n<x<x^(1/n)

(2)x^(n−1)>x^(2n−2)
1/x > 1 only if x is a POSITIVE FRACTION BETWEEN 0 AND 1.
Question stem, rephrased:
Is x a positive fraction between 0 and 1?

A prime number greater than 2 must be ODD.
Any odd exponent greater than 1 will have the same effect on the two statements.
Thus, the two statements can be rephrased with n=3, as follows:
x³ < x < x^(1/3)
x² > x�.

Statement 1: x³ < x < x^(1/3)
Case 1: x=-8
Here, x³=-512 and x^(1/3) = -2, with the result that the inequality in red becomes:
-512 < -8 < -2.
Case 2: x=1/8
Here, x³=1/512 and x^(1/3) = 2, with the result that the inequality in red becomes:
1/512 < 1/8 <1/2.
Since the answer to the question stem is NO in Case 1 but YES in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: x² > x�
Since the inequality in blue implies that x is NONZERO, x² > 0.
Thus, we can safely divide each side by x²:
x²/x² > x�/x²
1 > x²
x² < 1.
Here, it's possible that x is a positive fraction between 0 and 1 (in which case the answer to the question stem is YES) or a negative fraction between -1 and 0 (in which case the answer to the question stem is NO).
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Of the two ranges for x that satisfy Statement 2 -- 0<x<1 and -1<x<0 -- only the first will satisfy Statement 1.
Thus, for both statements to be satisfied, x must be a positive fraction between 0 and 1, implying that the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Thu Jun 22, 2017 10:40 pm
Piggybacking a bit, the second statement can be written this way:

x� � ¹ > (x� � ¹)²

We know that n is an odd prime, or n = 2m + 1, where m is some positive integer whose value we don't care about. Substituting, we have

x²��¹ � ¹ > (x²��¹ � ¹)²

or

x²� > (x²�)²

or

x²� > x��

Since x ≠ 0 (or else the inequality above is impossible), we can safely divide both sides by x²�, which must be positive (it's a nonzero square), to get 1 > x²�, or 1 > x > -1 with x ≠ 0.