x is the sum of y consecutive integers. w is the sum of z consecutive integers. If y = 2z, and y and z are both positive integers, then each of the following could be true EXCEPT
A) x = w
B) x > w
C) x/y is an integer
D) w/z is an integer
E) x/z is an integer
OAC
If y = 2z, and y and z are both positive integers
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
w, x, y and z are all integers.rsarashi wrote:x is the sum of y consecutive integers. w is the sum of z consecutive integers. If y = 2z, and y and z are both positive integers, then each of the following could be true EXCEPT
A) x = w
B) x > w
C) x/y is an integer
D) w/z is an integer
E) x/z is an integer
Test the SMALLEST POSSIBLE CASE.
Let z=1.
Since z=1, it must be possible that w/z and x/z are integers.
Eliminate D and E.
Since z=1, w is the sum of 1 consecutive integer, implying that w can be ANY INTEGER.
Thus, it must be possible that x=w or that x>w.
Eliminate A and B.
The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
This is testing a very particular rule in consecutive integers: if you have an EVEN number of terms, the sum will never be divisible by the number of terms. If you have an ODD number of terms, the sum *will* be divisible by the number of terms.
This is because, by definition, SUM = (AVERAGE)*(NUMBER OF TERMS), and in a consecutive set, AVERAGE = MEDIAN.
If you have an EVEN number of terms, the median is a non-integer:
[4, 5, 6, 7]
median = 5.5
sum = (5.5)(4) = 22
If we divide the sum by the number of terms, we get a non-integer: the median. Thus, the sum is not divisible by the number of terms.
If you have an ODD number of terms, the median is an integer:
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
median = 6
sum = (6)(5) = 30
If we divide the sum by the number of terms, we get an integer: the median. Thus, the sum is divisible by the number of terms.
So in this problem, if y = 2z, then y must be even: there are an EVEN number of terms in the set. The sum cannot possibly be divisible by the number of terms in an even set, so x cannot be divisible by y.
The answer is C.
This is because, by definition, SUM = (AVERAGE)*(NUMBER OF TERMS), and in a consecutive set, AVERAGE = MEDIAN.
If you have an EVEN number of terms, the median is a non-integer:
[4, 5, 6, 7]
median = 5.5
sum = (5.5)(4) = 22
If we divide the sum by the number of terms, we get a non-integer: the median. Thus, the sum is not divisible by the number of terms.
If you have an ODD number of terms, the median is an integer:
[4, 5, 6, 7, 8]
median = 6
sum = (6)(5) = 30
If we divide the sum by the number of terms, we get an integer: the median. Thus, the sum is divisible by the number of terms.
So in this problem, if y = 2z, then y must be even: there are an EVEN number of terms in the set. The sum cannot possibly be divisible by the number of terms in an even set, so x cannot be divisible by y.
The answer is C.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
GMAT/MBA Expert
- ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Also, please always POST YOUR SOURCES. It is a copyright violation not to do so.
This question comes from Manhattan Prep CATs.
This question comes from Manhattan Prep CATs.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
It seems to me that the question really tests the ability to either quickly pick smart numbers that rule out four of the answers and/or the ability to quickly whip up an equation that will show the impossibility of one of the answers.
If I take the first approach, some easy sets are:
{1} vs {0,1} (eliminate A)
{1} vs {1,2} (eliminate B)
{1, 2, 3} (eliminate D)
{1, 2, 3, 4} vs {1, 2} (eliminate E)
If I take the second approach, I know that
x = n + (n + 1) + ... + (n + 2z - 1)
x = 2z * n + (1 + 2 + ... + 2z - 1)
x = 2zn + (2z - 1)*2z*(1/2) = 2zn + (2z - 1)*z
Since y = 2z, we know that x/y = (2nz + z * (2z - 1)) / 2z
Simplified, that becomes 2zn/2z + z*(2z - 1)/2z. The first term is an integer, but the second is not, so we'll never get an integer here for any integer z.
It's a great Q, with (at least) two clever and generally relevant paths to a solution - don't sell it short!
If I take the first approach, some easy sets are:
{1} vs {0,1} (eliminate A)
{1} vs {1,2} (eliminate B)
{1, 2, 3} (eliminate D)
{1, 2, 3, 4} vs {1, 2} (eliminate E)
If I take the second approach, I know that
x = n + (n + 1) + ... + (n + 2z - 1)
x = 2z * n + (1 + 2 + ... + 2z - 1)
x = 2zn + (2z - 1)*2z*(1/2) = 2zn + (2z - 1)*z
Since y = 2z, we know that x/y = (2nz + z * (2z - 1)) / 2z
Simplified, that becomes 2zn/2z + z*(2z - 1)/2z. The first term is an integer, but the second is not, so we'll never get an integer here for any integer z.
It's a great Q, with (at least) two clever and generally relevant paths to a solution - don't sell it short!
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
One other trick that just occurred to me:
If you're trying to backsolve from the answers, note that C implies E. (If x is divisible by 2z, then x must be divisible by z.)
With that in mind, you don't even need to bother with E!
If you're trying to backsolve from the answers, note that C implies E. (If x is divisible by 2z, then x must be divisible by z.)
With that in mind, you don't even need to bother with E!