Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states that still has a sizable wolf population, and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.
(A) that still has a sizable wolf population, and where
(B) that still has a sizable wolf population, where
(C) that still has a sizable population of wolves, and where
(D) where the population of wolves is still sizable;
(E) where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where
OA:E
[spoiler]Why A is wrong? Both are relative pronoun that can refer to Minnesota.
In OA E, it is not clear whether 'where' refer to 'states' or Minnesota, while in choice A, it is clear that 'that' refers to 'one' which. in turn' refers to Minnesota' So the fcous and menng of the sentence is clear in A.
where is the problem[/spoiler]
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Modifiers problem....OG quesion
This topic has expert replies
-
GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
A that-modifier cannot be parallel with a where-modifier.
Incorrect:
John visited the easternmost state that has a sizable population of wolves and where this predator remains the archenemy of sheep.
In the red that-modifier, the easternmost state is the implied subject of has.
Conveyed meaning:
THE EASTERNMOST STATE has a sizable population of wolves.
In the blue where-clause, the easternmost state is an implied ADVERB modifying remains.
Conveyed meaning:
IN THE EASTERNMOST STATE this predator remains the archenemy of sheep.
Since the easternmost state is the implied subject of the that-modifier but an implied adverb in the where-modifier, the result is a lack of parallelism.
Here, and incorrectly serves to connect the that-modifier in red to the where-modifier in blue.
The result is a lack of parallelism.
Eliminate A.
Here, if we interpret that where serves to refer to states, we get the following meaning:
Of the contiguous forty-eight states where there is still a sizable population of wolves, Minnesota is the only one.
The portion in red does not convey a complete meaning.
Thus, it is crystal clear that where does NOT serve to refer to states.
Only one interpretation is logical: where must serve to refer to the only one, conveying the following meaning:
Of the contiguous forty-eight states, Minnesota is the only one where there is still a sizable population of wolves.
This meaning makes sense.
Incorrect:
John visited the easternmost state that has a sizable population of wolves and where this predator remains the archenemy of sheep.
In the red that-modifier, the easternmost state is the implied subject of has.
Conveyed meaning:
THE EASTERNMOST STATE has a sizable population of wolves.
In the blue where-clause, the easternmost state is an implied ADVERB modifying remains.
Conveyed meaning:
IN THE EASTERNMOST STATE this predator remains the archenemy of sheep.
Since the easternmost state is the implied subject of the that-modifier but an implied adverb in the where-modifier, the result is a lack of parallelism.
A: Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states that still has a sizable wolf population, and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.Mo2men wrote:Why A is wrong? Both are relative pronoun that can refer to Minnesota.
Here, and incorrectly serves to connect the that-modifier in red to the where-modifier in blue.
The result is a lack of parallelism.
Eliminate A.
OA: Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.In OA E, it is not clear whether 'where' refer to 'states' or Minnesota, while in choice A, it is clear that 'that' refers to 'one' which. in turn' refers to Minnesota' So the fcous and menng of the sentence is clear in A.
where is the problem
Here, if we interpret that where serves to refer to states, we get the following meaning:
Of the contiguous forty-eight states where there is still a sizable population of wolves, Minnesota is the only one.
The portion in red does not convey a complete meaning.
Thus, it is crystal clear that where does NOT serve to refer to states.
Only one interpretation is logical: where must serve to refer to the only one, conveying the following meaning:
Of the contiguous forty-eight states, Minnesota is the only one where there is still a sizable population of wolves.
This meaning makes sense.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
ceilidh.erickson
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2095
- Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2012 3:22 pm
- Thanked: 1443 times
- Followed by:247 members
Here is a breakdown of the other answer choices:
Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states that still has a sizable wolf population, and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.
(A) that still has a sizable wolf population, and where
As Mitch pointed out, a subordinate clause beginning with "that" cannot be parallel to a subordinate clause beginning with "where."
(B) that still has a sizable wolf population, where
When a subordinate clause beginning with a relative pronoun (e.g. "where") is placed after a comma, it modifies the noun (or noun phrase) after it. In this case "where" is modifying "wolf population." This is nonsensical.
(C) that still has a sizable population of wolves, and where
This answer choice is indistinguishable from A. There is no difference in meaning between "wolf population" and "population of wolves." If you see answer choices such as these that differ only by a minor discrepancy in word choice, it's likely that both answers are wrong.
(D) where the population of wolves is still sizable;
This answer choice is perfectly grammatically correct; the semicolon fixes the parallelism issue. However... the meaning is disrupted. The intended meaning of the sentence is "it's the only place where there are wolves AND the sheep they prey on." By splitting the sentence with a semicolon, that contrast in meaning is lost, and the 2nd part of the sentence has little logical connection to the 1st.
(E) where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where
Correct! Parallel structure, and clear meaning.
Minnesota is the only one of the contiguous forty-eight states that still has a sizable wolf population, and where this predator remains the archenemy of cattle and sheep.
(A) that still has a sizable wolf population, and where
As Mitch pointed out, a subordinate clause beginning with "that" cannot be parallel to a subordinate clause beginning with "where."
(B) that still has a sizable wolf population, where
When a subordinate clause beginning with a relative pronoun (e.g. "where") is placed after a comma, it modifies the noun (or noun phrase) after it. In this case "where" is modifying "wolf population." This is nonsensical.
(C) that still has a sizable population of wolves, and where
This answer choice is indistinguishable from A. There is no difference in meaning between "wolf population" and "population of wolves." If you see answer choices such as these that differ only by a minor discrepancy in word choice, it's likely that both answers are wrong.
(D) where the population of wolves is still sizable;
This answer choice is perfectly grammatically correct; the semicolon fixes the parallelism issue. However... the meaning is disrupted. The intended meaning of the sentence is "it's the only place where there are wolves AND the sheep they prey on." By splitting the sentence with a semicolon, that contrast in meaning is lost, and the 2nd part of the sentence has little logical connection to the 1st.
(E) where there is still a sizable population of wolves and where
Correct! Parallel structure, and clear meaning.
Ceilidh Erickson
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
EdM in Mind, Brain, and Education
Harvard Graduate School of Education
