Australian embryologists

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

Australian embryologists

by gmat740 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 7:59 am
42) Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.
(A) that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal, and its trunk originally evolved
(B) that has suggested the elephant descended from an aquatic animal, its trunk originally evolving
(C) suggesting that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal with its trunk originally evolving
(D) to suggest that the elephant had descended from an aquatic animal and its trunk originally evolving
(E) to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved


OA E

I am not convinced by the OA

I feel " is descended from" is wrong

please shed some light

Legendary Member
Posts: 527
Joined: Thu May 01, 2008 12:06 am
Thanked: 7 times

Re: Australian embryologists

by real2008 » Sat Jun 06, 2009 9:20 am
I too agree with you. 'is descended' is really difficult to digest. but 'originally evolving' is also difficult to agree with. however it appears to me choice e has parallel:

Australian embryologists have found evidence to suggest that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel

pl comment....

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Wed Jun 10, 2009 1:01 pm
When an 'and' is present, that is a tip-off to start searching for parallelism. Because of this, we can eliminate choices A, D (we need the word 'that'). Now, choice B can be eliminated since the answer suggests that the aquatic animal's trunk originally evolved... this leaves us with choices C and E. We need to choose 'is descended', since the elephant is currently descended from the aquatic animal... it's not like it was descended some time back and is no longer descended from that animal. So, the answer is E.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2009 8:54 am
Thanked: 1 times

by redsome » Sat Jun 20, 2009 2:23 am
I also got this question wrong because I did not know that "evidence to do sth" is a correct idiom. I eliminated D and E in the first place.:wink: In fact, "evidence to suggest" is quite common in English. Silly me! :roll:

Regarding gmat740's opinion, I looked up into Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary and found out that
"to descend from sth" = "to develop from sth"
"to be descended from sth" = "to be related to sth"

From this information, both "is descended" and "descended" can be correct in this context.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 157
Joined: Tue Dec 04, 2007 9:05 am
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:680

by hemanth28 » Sat Jun 20, 2009 11:37 am
is + participle .... hmmm ... i guess i need some real good explanation to be convinced... Would someone explain how this is possible... ??? :roll:
GMAT First take :- 680
Getting the guns ready for second shot !!!
https://beatenbygmat.blocked

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Mon Aug 31, 2009 4:22 am
"is descended from" is an idiomatic expression. it means "descended" in the sense of EVOLUTIONARY ANCESTRY.
this is the only sense in which you can use this idiom.

"had descended" / "has descended" (i.e., normal past perfect / present perfect) is incorrect in this sense, as it implies literal downward motion.

hope that helps
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue Apr 22, 2008 1:54 pm
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:550

by hariharakarthi » Mon Aug 31, 2009 5:05 am
Hi,


I am convinced with original ans choice E.

Is the ans choice below is also correct,

that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal and that its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.

But it is not mentioned in the set of the ans choices.

But my qn is,

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that x and that y.

Is it correct?

Please explain in detail.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 15, 2009 12:49 pm
hariharakarthi wrote:But my qn is,

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that x and that y.

Is it correct?
this would be fine.

it would be considered awkward because there are two "that"s so close together. presumably, this is why the correct answer here employs the infinitive instead.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 343
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:28 pm
Thanked: 4 times

by arorag » Tue Sep 15, 2009 4:55 pm
lunarpower wrote:
hariharakarthi wrote:Buhttps://www.beatthegmat.com/posting.php?mode=quote&p=190171t my qn is,

Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that x and that y.

Is it correct?
this would be fine.

it would be considered awkward because there are two "that"s so close together. presumably, this is why the correct answer here employs the infinitive instead.
Why E is superior to A????

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 268
Joined: Sat Aug 15, 2009 9:22 am
Thanked: 19 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:700

by capnx » Tue Sep 15, 2009 8:20 pm
for parallelism (that... and that...) and also "its" in A is a little ambiguous, elephant or the amphibious animal?

Legendary Member
Posts: 833
Joined: Mon Aug 04, 2008 1:56 am
Thanked: 13 times

by vivek.kapoor83 » Tue Sep 15, 2009 9:24 pm
that suggest seems to be better than ' to suggest' , So will go with A..
Please help me in understanding why E is superior to A. i am not convinced

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 295
Joined: Tue Jul 15, 2008 10:07 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:690

by vaibhav.iit2002 » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:01 am
A and E are close but I don't find even a single reason to prefer E to A whereas A seems ok because it uses "that...."

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Wed Sep 16, 2009 10:23 pm
arorag wrote:Why E is superior to A????
(a) is actually INCORRECT, not just awkward, because of the way parallelism is indicated by the comma.

if you have a comma before a coordinating conjunction - as in "X, and Y" - then X and Y MUST be parallel clauses.

with this in mind, let's turn to (a):
Australian embryologists have found evidence that suggests that the elephant is descended from an aquatic animal,
and
its trunk originally evolved as a kind of snorkel.

in other words, the embryologists have found evidence regarding the elephant's ancestry - but NOT about the trunk (this is just stated as a standalone fact).

if you remove the comma, then (a) becomes a viable answer.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 41
Joined: Tue Jun 30, 2009 5:09 am
Thanked: 2 times

by kamalsinghy » Fri Sep 18, 2009 9:47 am
Hi Ron,

I understand from this question is that it is related to DICTION concept of OG.

Here embroyologists wants to suggest with the help of evidences, and they wanted to say two things that need to be in parallel grammatical structures.

The above construction is fulfilled by E only. My concept is that the given options may be grammatically correct but we should choose the option which the test-maker wanted to say without changing the meaning of given question.

Please comment if I am wrong somewhere.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3380
Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
Thanked: 2256 times
Followed by:1535 members
GMAT Score:800

by lunarpower » Tue Sep 22, 2009 3:07 am
kamalsinghy wrote:Hi Ron,

I understand from this question is that it is related to DICTION concept of OG.

Here embroyologists wants to suggest with the help of evidences, and they wanted to say two things that need to be in parallel grammatical structures.

The above construction is fulfilled by E only. My concept is that the given options may be grammatically correct but we should choose the option which the test-maker wanted to say without changing the meaning of given question.

Please comment if I am wrong somewhere.
this is correct. specifically, the grammar of (a) has no real problems - but, as noted in my post above, it just doesn't say what it's supposed to say.

yes, context is every bit as important as grammar.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.

--

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi

--

Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.

Yves Saint-Laurent

--

Learn more about ron