Quant GMAC problem

This topic has expert replies
Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:38 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

Quant GMAC problem

by Biji » Wed Nov 02, 2016 8:10 am
The expression h(n) is the product of all the consecutive integers from 2 to n inclusive and n is a positive even integer. What is the smallest possible prime factor p of the expression h(100)+1 ?

1. p lies between 2 and 10
2. p lies between 10 and 20
3. p lies between 20 and 30
4. p lies between 30 and 40
5. p is greater than 40

Experts ! Please help with a detailed explanation.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 16207
Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
Location: Vancouver, BC
Thanked: 5254 times
Followed by:1268 members
GMAT Score:770

by Brent@GMATPrepNow » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:00 am
For every positive even integer n, the function h(n) is defined to be the product of all even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. If p is the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, the p is

A: Between 2 & 10
B: Between 10 & 20
C: Between 20 & 30
D: Between 30 & 40
E: Greater than 40
Important Concept: If integer k is greater than 1, and k is a factor (divisor) of N, then k is not a divisor of N+1
For example, since 7 is a factor of 350, we know that 7 is not a factor of (350+1)
v, we know that 8 is not a factor of 313

Now let's examine h(100)
h(100) = (2)(4)(6)(8)....(96)(98)(100)
= (2x1)(2x2)(2x3)(2x4)....(2x48)(2x49)(2x50)
Factor out all of the 2's to get: h(100) = [2^50][(1)(2)(3)(4)....(48)(49)(50)]

Since 2 is in the product of h(100), we know that 2 is a factor of h(100), which means that 2 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 3 is in the product of h(100), we know that 3 is a factor of h(100), which means that 3 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

Similarly, since 5 is in the product of h(100), we know that 5 is a factor of h(100), which means that 5 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

.
.
.
.
Similarly, since 47 is in the product of h(100), we know that 47 is a factor of h(100), which means that 47 is not a factor of h(100)+1 (based on the above rule)

So, we can see that none of the primes from 2 to 47 can be factors of h(100)+1, which means the smallest prime factor of h(100)+1 must be greater than 47.

Answer = E

Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
Image

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Jan 08, 2016 3:38 am
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by Biji » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:29 am
Thats a very insightful explanation. Thanks a lot :)

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2663
Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
Location: Boston, MA
Thanked: 1153 times
Followed by:128 members
GMAT Score:770

by DavidG@VeritasPrep » Wed Nov 02, 2016 9:41 am
I wrote a post about a similar problem here: https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2016/0 ... -the-gmat/
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor

Veritas Prep Reviews
Save $100 off any live Veritas Prep GMAT Course

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 7243
Joined: Sat Apr 25, 2015 10:56 am
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Thanked: 43 times
Followed by:29 members

by Scott@TargetTestPrep » Fri Nov 04, 2016 8:43 am
Biji wrote:The expression h(n) is the product of all the consecutive integers from 2 to n inclusive and n is a positive even integer. What is the smallest possible prime factor p of the expression h(100)+1 ?

A) p lies between 2 and 10
B) p lies between 10 and 20
C) p lies between 20 and 30
D) p lies between 30 and 40
E) p is greater than 40

We are given that h(n) is defined to be the product of all the even integers from 2 to n, inclusive. For example, h(8) = 2 x 4 x 6 x 8.

We need to determine the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1. Before determining the smallest prime factor of h(100) + 1, we must recognize that h(100) and h(100) + 1 are consecutive integers, and consecutive integers will never share the same prime factors.

Thus, h(100) and h(100) + 1 must have different prime factors. However, rather than determining all the prime factors of h(100) let's determine the largest prime factor of h(100). Since h(100) is the product of even integers from 2 to 100 inclusive, let's find the largest even integer less than 100 that is the product of 2 and a prime number.

That prime number is 47 since 2 x 47 = 94, which is less than 100. The next prime after 47 is 53 but 2 x 53 = 106 is greater than 100.

Therefore, 47 is the largest prime number that is a factor of h(100). In fact, all prime numbers from 2 to 47 are included in the prime factorization of h(100). Since we have mentioned that h(100) + 1 will not have any of the prime factors of h(100), all the prime factors in h(100) + 1, including the smallest one, must be greater than 47. Looking at the answer choices, only choice E can be the correct answer.

Answer: E

Scott Woodbury-Stewart
Founder and CEO
[email protected]

Image

See why Target Test Prep is rated 5 out of 5 stars on BEAT the GMAT. Read our reviews

ImageImage

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Fri Nov 04, 2016 9:46 am
Hi Biji,

This question shows up every so often in this Forum and it is definitely tougher than a typical GMAT question.

As a general rule, Quant questions are almost always based on a pattern of some kind (math formula, math rule, Number Property, etc.). If you can't immediately deduce a pattern, then you might have to "play around" a bit with the question to try to deduce what the pattern is. In the broad sense, it's critical thinking: here's a weird situation - what can I do to figure it out?

Based on the description of the function in the prompt, we can run some "TESTS" to try to figure things out....

The H(n) is the product of all the even integers from 2 to n, inclusive.

So....
H(4) = 2x4 = 8
The prime factors of 8 are (2)(2)(2)
If we do H(4) + 1 = 9, then the prime factors are (3)(3)
NOTICE how NONE of the prime factors of 8 are in 9? That's interesting....

H(6) = 2x4x6 = 48
The prime factors of 48 are (2)(2)(2)(2)(3)
If we do H(6) + 1 = 49, then the prime factors are (7)(7)
NOTICE how NONE of the prime factors of 48 are in 49? That's interesting....and probably a pattern, since it's happened TWICE NOW.

From here, I'd have to deduce that this pattern holds true. With H(100), I know that there are LOTS of primes that go in (the largest of which is 47, which can be "found" in 94). I have to assume that NONE of them will go into H(100) + 1. Thus, the smallest prime would have to be greater than 47. The question doesn't actually ask us for the exact answer though (the answer choices are "ranges").

The takeaway from all of this is that you shouldn't be afraid to "play" with a question a bit. In the end, you don't have to be a brilliant mathematician to answer this question, but you're also not allowed to just stare at it either.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2630
Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
Location: East Bay all the way
Thanked: 625 times
Followed by:119 members
GMAT Score:780

by Matt@VeritasPrep » Fri Nov 11, 2016 3:44 pm
I'd also add that this one has been asked so many times on various GMAT forums that the probability of the GMAC using something close to it again on the actual exam seems to me to be very, very low! This is one of their unusual, creative questions that they don't seem to recycle, but as some of the solutions above show you, pattern recognition and educated guessing is enough to solve it (or any other tricky, rare number property question on the test).