Ques)A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $2

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 187
Joined: Tue Sep 13, 2016 12:46 am
Ques)A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45, and $70, respectively. On a given
day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another stock decreased by 35% and the
prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by
approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?
(A) $20, $35, and $70
(B) $20, $45, and $70
(C) $20, $35, and $40
(D) $35, $40, and $70
(E) $35, $40, and $45

Please assist with above problem.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sun Sep 18, 2016 3:10 am
alanforde800Maximus wrote:Ques)A certain portfolio consisted of 5 stocks, priced at $20, $35, $40, $45, and $70, respectively. On a given
day, the price of one stock increased by 15%, while the price of another stock decreased by 35% and the
prices of the remaining three remained constant. If the average price of a stock in the portfolio rose by
approximately 2%, which of the following could be the prices of the shares that remained constant?
(A) $20, $35, and $70
(B) $20, $45, and $70
(C) $20, $35, and $40
(D) $35, $40, and $70
(E) $35, $40, and $45

Please assist with above problem.
Use reason.
The increase in one price (15%) is LESS THAN HALF the decrease in another price (35%), yet the NET increase is 2%.
Thus, the price that increases must be MUCH HIGHER than the price that decreases.
Only $70 and $20 are sufficiently far apart, implying that the other 3 prices (35,40,45) do not change.

The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 51
Joined: Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:59 pm
Thanked: 20 times

by MBA Challengers » Mon Sep 19, 2016 8:54 am
While the method described by GMATGuruNY is the quickest way to do it, in case that logic doesn't strike, a slightly convoluted way to solve the problem is:
15% rise and 35% decline shows that the rise has to be on a higher value than the decline
The value of the stock portfolio increased by 2%. The total stocks have been purchased for $210. Thus, in absolute terms the increase is approximately $4.2.
Use the process of elimination and check as to in which option 15% of the higher missing stock value is greater than 35% of the smaller missing stock value.
Starting from the middle ie Option C, the constant shares are $20, $35 and $40. So, 15% of $70 should be $4.20 more than 35% of $45. Comparing $10.5 (15% of $70) and -$15.75 (35% of $45) shows that the value of the portfolio would have dropped.
Thus, we need a much smaller share for the one where the value has dropped while keep the $70 share constant for the 15% increase. The only other option where the $70 stock is one of the moving shares is Option E. Comparing $10.5 (15% of $70) and -$7 (35% of $20) shows that the value of the portfolio rose by $3.5 which is approximately the absolute value of 2% on the portfolio.
Thus, the answer to this question is E.
Log on to www.mbachallengers.com for
Easy strategic GMAT prep
For any queries mail us at [email protected]
Follow MBA Challengers on Facebook