Please explain.
Are X and Y both positive
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:53 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:780
(1) Not sufficient. x = 1, y = 1/2 OR x = 1/2, y = 0, etc...
(2) Not sufficient. This implies x and y have the same sign, and x has a larger absolute value than y. But they could both be positive, or both be negative.
Combined (1) and (2) are sufficient. If x and y were both negative and x has a larger absolute value than y, then 2x - 2y has to evaluate to be negative. You would be adding a positive term to a negative term with a larger absolute value, and the result would always be negative. Thus, x and y must both be positive. The answer is C.
800 or bust!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Are x and y both positive?Are x and y both positive?
1) 2x - 2y =1
2) x/y >1
Statement 1: 2x - 2y = 1
There are several pairs of numbers that satisfy this condition. Here are two:
Case a: x = 1 and y = 0.5, in which case x and y are both positive
Case b: x = -0.5 and y = -1, in which case x and y are not both positive
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x/y > 1
This tells us that x/y is positive. This means that either x and y are both positive or x and y are both negative. Here are two possible cases:
Case a: x = 4 and y = 2, in which case x and y are both positive
Case b: x = -4 and y = -2, in which case x and y are not both positive
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Statements 1 and 2
Statement 1 tells us that 2x - 2y = 1.
Divide both sides by 2 to get: x - y = 1/2
Solve for x to get x = y + 1/2
Now take the statement 2 inequality (x/y > 1) and replace x with y + 1/2 to get:
(y + 1/2)/y > 1
Rewrite as: y/y + (1/2)/y > 1
Simplify: 1 + 1/(2y) > 1
Subtract 1 from both sides: 1/(2y) > 0
If 1/(2y) is positive, then y must be positive.
Statement 2 tells us that either x and y are both positive or x and y are both negative.
Now that we know that y is positive, it must be the case that x and y are both positive
Since we can now answer the target question with certainty, the combined statements are SUFFICIENT
Answer = C
Cheers,
Brent
Dear Brent,Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Target question: Are x y both positive?Are x y both positive?
1) 2x - 2y =1
2) x/y >1
Statement 2: x/y > 1
This tells us that x/y is positive. This means that either x y are both positive or x y are both negative. Here are two possible cases:
Case a: x = 4 y = 2, in which case x y are both positive
Case b: x = -4 y = -2, in which case x y are not both positive
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Brent
Could you please clear this doubt of mine.
IS x/y>1 != x>y
I solved this problem in this process
Since x/y>1 it should also follow x>y
if x=3 , y=2
3/2>1 and 3>2.
whereas if x=-4 y=-2
x/y >1
but x>y is false
so B is sufficient , both x y should be positive.
Where am I thinking wrong?
Regards
Teja
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
The part above (in green) is incorrect.evs.teja wrote:
Dear Brent,
Could you please clear this doubt of mine.
IS x/y>1 != x>y
I solved this problem in this process
Since x/y>1 it should also follow x>y
if x=3 , y=2
3/2>1 and 3>2.
whereas if x=-4 y=-2
x/y >1
but x>y is false
so B is sufficient , both x y should be positive.
Where am I thinking wrong?
Regards
Teja
You have taken x/y > 1 and multiplied both sides by y to get x > y
We can only do this if we are CERTAIN that y is positive.
For example, we know that 3/2 > 1
If we multiply both sides by 2, we get 3 > 2. Great!
However, what about this case: (-3)/(-2) > 1
If we multiply both sides by -2, we get -3 > -2. Oops!
Since can cannot be certain that y is positive in the inequality x/y > 1, we cannot multiply both sides by y to get x > y
For more on this, see the following video: https://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat ... /video/979
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Tue Jun 28, 2016 6:39 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:780
I think most points are lost on this question when test takers try to multiply both sides of the inequality in statement 2 by y to get x > y.
The reason we cannot do this is that we don't know whether y is positive or negative. Recall that for inequalities, if you multiply or divide by a negative, you have to flip the direction of the inequality sign ( 3 > 2 ----> -3 < -2). But if we don't know the sign of the thing your multiplying both sides by, we don't know if the inequality sign stays the same or flips around.
Often, I find it very helpful to keep track of both options. For example, here:
x/y > 1
case 1: if y pos: x > y
case 2: if y neg: x < y
For this question, doing this might help make the subsequent deductions a little easier. Statement 1 can be written as x = y + 1/2. In other words, x is 1/2 greater than y. And if x is greater, we can't be in case 2 above. We must be in case 1. y must be positive. And if y is positive, and x is greater than y, x muust be positive too.
The reason we cannot do this is that we don't know whether y is positive or negative. Recall that for inequalities, if you multiply or divide by a negative, you have to flip the direction of the inequality sign ( 3 > 2 ----> -3 < -2). But if we don't know the sign of the thing your multiplying both sides by, we don't know if the inequality sign stays the same or flips around.
Often, I find it very helpful to keep track of both options. For example, here:
x/y > 1
case 1: if y pos: x > y
case 2: if y neg: x < y
For this question, doing this might help make the subsequent deductions a little easier. Statement 1 can be written as x = y + 1/2. In other words, x is 1/2 greater than y. And if x is greater, we can't be in case 2 above. We must be in case 1. y must be positive. And if y is positive, and x is greater than y, x muust be positive too.
Email: [email protected]
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 199
- Joined: Sat Apr 26, 2014 10:53 am
- Thanked: 16 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:780
Remember when you multiply and divide across an equality, the direction of the sign changes if the value being multiplied or divided is negative. Thus, we cannot say that if x/y > 1 that x > y unless we know for certain that y is positive.evs.teja wrote:Dear Brent,Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Target question: Are x y both positive?Are x y both positive?
1) 2x - 2y =1
2) x/y >1
Statement 2: x/y > 1
This tells us that x/y is positive. This means that either x y are both positive or x y are both negative. Here are two possible cases:
Case a: x = 4 y = 2, in which case x y are both positive
Case b: x = -4 y = -2, in which case x y are not both positive
Since we cannot answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is NOT SUFFICIENT
Brent
Could you please clear this doubt of mine.
IS x/y>1 != x>y
I solved this problem in this process
Since x/y>1 it should also follow x>y
if x=3 , y=2
3/2>1 and 3>2.
whereas if x=-4 y=-2
x/y >1
but x>y is false
so B is sufficient , both x y should be positive.
Where am I thinking wrong?
Regards
Teja
800 or bust!
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
We could also say
x - y = 1/2
and
x/y > 1
x/y - 1 > 0
(x - y)/y > 0
Combining the two, we have
(1/2)/y > 0
So y must be positive. Since y > 0, we know x = 1/2 + (something greater than 0), so x is also positive.
This keeps us away from the sign-flipping hazard, and is easier for some students to see (and believe!)
x - y = 1/2
and
x/y > 1
x/y - 1 > 0
(x - y)/y > 0
Combining the two, we have
(1/2)/y > 0
So y must be positive. Since y > 0, we know x = 1/2 + (something greater than 0), so x is also positive.
This keeps us away from the sign-flipping hazard, and is easier for some students to see (and believe!)