For a certain race, 3 teams allowed to enter 3 members each. A team earned 6-n points whenever one of its team members finished in nth place, where 1<equal n <equal 5 . There were no ties, disqualifications, or withdrawals. If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?
A) 0
B) 1
C) 2
D) 3
E) 4
OAD
least possible score a team could have earned
This topic has expert replies
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
nth place = 6-n points.For a certain race, 3 teams were allowed to enter 3 members each. A team earned 6-n points whenever one of its members finished in nth places, where 1≤n≤5. there were no ties, disqualifications, or withdrawals. If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?
0
1
2
3
4
Thus:
1st place = 6-1 = 5 points.
2nd place = 6-2 = 4 points.
3rd place = 6-3 = 3 points.
4th place = 6-4 = 2 points.
5th place = 6-5 = 1 point.
Let the 3 teams be A, B and C.
To MINIMIZE the number of points that Team C could earn, we must MAXIMIZE the number of points that Teams A and B earn.
The maximum allowed total per team = 6.
It's possible that Team A wins 1st and 5th places (for a total of 6 points) and that Team B wins 2nd and 4th places (for a total of 6 points) -- the MAXIMUM allowed sum for each team.
Thus, the MINIMUM number of points that could be earned by team C -- winning only 3rd place -- is 3.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
The GMAT loves min/max questions. See here for another one: https://www.beatthegmat.com/5-pieces-of- ... 69883.html
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi jain2016,
Mitch's explanation for this question is spot-on, so I won't rehash any of that here. Instead, I want to focus on the 'design element' of most GMAT questions.
While the 'math' involved in most Quant questions is usually fairly straight-forward (low-to-mid level Arithmetic, Algebra or Geometry, in most cases), the questions themselves usually involve 3-5 'steps.' The steps themselves are usually not individually all that complex, but you do have to go through them to be sure that you have the correct answer. If you find yourself thinking "oh, the answer is obviously ____, and I don't have to write anything down....", then you might be correct, but there's a decent possibility that you're NOT. That choice - whether to do work on the pad or not - is pivotal to your performance throughout the Test. Your goal should be to do efficient, organized and strategic work on EVERY question - since that's what will help you get a high score and those are skills that Business Schools are looking for in their applicants.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Mitch's explanation for this question is spot-on, so I won't rehash any of that here. Instead, I want to focus on the 'design element' of most GMAT questions.
While the 'math' involved in most Quant questions is usually fairly straight-forward (low-to-mid level Arithmetic, Algebra or Geometry, in most cases), the questions themselves usually involve 3-5 'steps.' The steps themselves are usually not individually all that complex, but you do have to go through them to be sure that you have the correct answer. If you find yourself thinking "oh, the answer is obviously ____, and I don't have to write anything down....", then you might be correct, but there's a decent possibility that you're NOT. That choice - whether to do work on the pad or not - is pivotal to your performance throughout the Test. Your goal should be to do efficient, organized and strategic work on EVERY question - since that's what will help you get a high score and those are skills that Business Schools are looking for in their applicants.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi GMATGuru,GMATGuruNY wrote:nth place = 6-n points.For a certain race, 3 teams were allowed to enter 3 members each. A team earned 6-n points whenever one of its members finished in nth places, where 1≤n≤5. there were no ties, disqualifications, or withdrawals. If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?
0
1
2
3
4
Thus:
1st place = 6-1 = 5 points.
2nd place = 6-2 = 4 points.
3rd place = 6-3 = 3 points.
4th place = 6-4 = 2 points.
5th place = 6-5 = 1 point.
Let the 3 teams be A, B and C.
To MINIMIZE the number of points that Team C could earn, we must MAXIMIZE the number of points that Teams A and B earn.
The maximum allowed total per team = 6.
It's possible that Team A wins 1st and 5th places (for a total of 6 points) and that Team B wins 2nd and 4th places (for a total of 6 points) -- the MAXIMUM allowed sum for each team.
Thus, the MINIMUM number of points that could be earned by team C -- winning only 3rd place -- is 3.
The correct answer is D.
I do not understand how the maximum allowed total per team = 6. what is the scenario if All team A takes the first 3 places and Team B takes the bottom 2 places?
I have calculated this as follows:
A team members can be in 1st, 2nd and 3rd places. So total points should be 5+4+3=12
B team members can be in 44th and 5th places. So total =3
Can you please clarify??
Thanks
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Reread the prompt: If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?I do not understand how the maximum allowed total per team = 6.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
yes, you are right. Rush reading leading to that question.DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:Reread the prompt: If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?I do not understand how the maximum allowed total per team = 6.
thanks for pointing out.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
Always worth it to reread questions, just to be safeMo2men wrote:yes, you are right. Rush reading leading to that question.DavidG@VeritasPrep wrote:Reread the prompt: If no team earned more than 6 points, what is the least possible score a team could have earned?I do not understand how the maximum allowed total per team = 6.
thanks for pointing out.
- DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
The no-tie restriction applies to individual placement in the race, not to the total number of points a team has accumulated. In other words, there cannot be two fourth-place finishers in the race, etc. (But, rest assured, you are not the first to have had this confusion.)rindam wrote:I think 4 should be the there is no tie..so team a and b can not have same score 6..so if we maximize score team a got 6 b 5 then c is left with 4..Pls let me know if I miss anything