Airplane Crash

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

Airplane Crash

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:27 am
Investigators concluded that human failure was not responsible for the fatal airplane crash last August, and since that time new and more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems have been in effect. That accounts for the fact that reports of airplane mechanical problems have increased in frequency by 50 percent since last August.

Which one of the following is an assumption underlying the argument in the passage?

(A) Airplane travel is still relatively safe, despite the increase in reported mechanical problems.

(B) Mechanical problems in airplanes have increased dramatically since last August.

(C) Mechanical problems in airplanes have not increased by 50 percent since last August.

(D) Airlines are less reluctant to report mechanical problems than they previously were.

(E) Mechanical problems in airplanes have become easier to detect since last August.


Please help with this one. Could someone estimate which level of difficulty this question falls under ?
Last edited by heshamelaziry on Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:11 am, edited 1 time in total.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 17
Joined: Thu Dec 17, 2009 10:55 pm
GMAT Score:600

by Focus_gmat » Wed Dec 23, 2009 10:55 am
IMO D is the answer. A and E are out of scope.The argument is that strigent rules led to increase in more problems being reported.The missing link here is that airlines are now made to report the problems due to stricter rules.B and C talk about mech problems but not about reports. Whats the OA ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:13 am
Focus_gmat:

I will post the OA as soon as I get 3 more opinions about the answer. Why E is out of scope ? Although E does not sound like a good answer for me, it is the best I could choose. E sounds more of an inference than an assumption.

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
Thanked: 98 times
Followed by:22 members

by fibbonnaci » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:32 am
IMO C.
Assumption is that- the application of stringent rules caused the increased reports.
In assumption always keep in mind there are 2 kinds:plain assumption used in the stimuli could be stated
or defender assumption- here the assumption maintains the status quo of the stimuli.

A is out of scope.
B is a weakener. mechanical problems increased so reports increased. (so this has nothing to do with the rules applied)
C- defender assumption. ur maintaining the status quo of the stimuli by eliminating any other possible reasons for the increase in reports. Here when u say Mechanical problems have not increased, we are infact eliminating any other cause that might have caused the increase in reports. So we maintain that the reports are caused only due to stringent rules and nothing else. Perfect answer.
D-If airlines are less reluctant to report now, what does that have to do with rules? The airlines could be less reluctant now for lot of other reasons too.we have to make a second assumption that because of the rules, the airlines are less reluctant.
E- if mechanical problems have been easier to detect, it explains the increase in reports. It infact weakens the statement that because of stringent rules being applied, the number of reports have increased.

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Wed Dec 23, 2009 11:49 am
fibbonnaci,

Thank you very much. I understand the technique used to construct choice C, but very hard for me to pick it up.

OA C

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 403
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 7:32 pm
Thanked: 98 times
Followed by:22 members

by fibbonnaci » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:09 pm
yup, but u will boil down to C /D. then dissect each option closely. u will see that C makes better sense than D.

GMAT Instructor
Posts: 1302
Joined: Mon Oct 19, 2009 2:13 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 539 times
Followed by:164 members
GMAT Score:800

by Testluv » Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:20 pm
Hesham, you could have just viewed this as another explain the phenomenon argument. The word "accounts" in the stimulus gives this away. The phenomenon: reports of problems have increased. The explanation: more stringent rules for identifying and reporting mechanical problems. The assumption: no other explanations. Choice C: if you deny it, the argument clearly falls apart. If we deny Choice C we have: mechanical problems have increased. If mechanical problems have increased then it suggests that the increase in reporting of mechanical problems is due to the fact there ARE more mechanical problems (rather than being due to the fact that reporting procedures are now more stringent.) Thus, the author's argument depends on choice C.

Choice D uses the word "reluctance". Here's a tip: choices that talk about people's motivations, biases, preferences, etc are almost always wrong (unless the argument is specifically about someone's motivations, biases, preferences, etc.)
Kaplan Teacher in Toronto

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 10:24 pm
I agree with you guys. I also think that the right answer is D