Critical Reasoning

"The new HitItFar driver is the only golf club that uses space-age Titanium-Kryptonium alloy to strengthen its head. This driver is SO good, the last 12 winners of the major tour championships have all recently switched to it! Isn't it time for you to add power to your swing and distance to your drives? Trade in your old driver today -- and HitItFar tomorrow!"

All of the following claims are either implied or made explicitly in the above advertisement EXCEPT:


Switching to the HitItFar driver will improve your play.

The HitItFar driver helped the last 12 major championship winners achieve their victory.

Major championship winners are experts and know what constitutes a great golf club.

Your existing driver is inferior to the HitItFar driver.

Only HitItFar golf clubs have Titanium-Kryptonium alloy in the head of their drivers.

OA B

Hi!

What is your question?

B is not implied b/c it states that all of the last 12 winners have recently switched. One may well misinterpret the ad to mean that it was because of the new club that they won. And I'm sure that the advertiser wouldn't mind such a misinterpretation. But a misinterpretation is what it would be.

Although, I must say, this is not a well designed question.

Looking at it now, E makes sense