SV40

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

SV40

by crackgmat007 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:05 pm
Although exposure to asbestos is the primary cause of mesothelioma, a slow-developing
cancer, researchers believe that infection by the SV40 virus is a contributing cause, since
in the United States 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas, but none from
healthy tissue, contain SV40. SV40 is a monkey virus; however, in 1960 some polio
vaccine was contaminated with the virus. Researchers hypothesize that this vaccine was
the source of the virus found in mesotheliomas decades later.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the researchers’ hypothesis?
A. SV40 is widely used as a research tool in cancer laboratories.
B. Changes in the technique of manufacturing the vaccine now prevent
contamination with SV40.
C. Recently discovered samples of the vaccine dating from 1960 still show traces of
the virus.
D. In a small percentage of cases of mesothelioma, there is no history of exposure to
asbestos.
E. In Finland, where the polio vaccine was never contaminated, samples from
mesotheliomas do not contain SV40.

For discussion. OA to follow

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 113
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 8:01 am
Thanked: 4 times

by italian7745 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:36 pm
IMO E

SV40 -------Mesotheliomas.....
60% Tissues from Mesotheliomas ----SV40....

However , in1960... Polio Vaccine was contaminated with SV40....So ....Polio Vaccine was the source...

E direclty supports the researchers hypothesis...by mentioning a place where polio vaccine was not contaminated and the samples from mesotheliomas there did not contain SV40....

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 435
Joined: Sat May 02, 2009 3:55 am
Thanked: 17 times

by madhur_ahuja » Wed Jul 29, 2009 8:48 pm
Agree with E

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 75
Joined: Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:41 am
Location: india
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:1 members

by armaan700+ » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:41 pm
IMO C

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 101
Joined: Fri Nov 21, 2008 4:14 am
Thanked: 2 times

by Spring2009 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 9:48 pm
I think E.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 11
Joined: Tue Jul 14, 2009 9:46 pm

by ananda271181 » Wed Jul 29, 2009 11:23 pm
IMO: D

There are two conclusion in the above text, first is that the cancer development is aided by the virus, and the second claim is that the virus is spread from the infected vaccine.
The second conclusion is supported by both C & E. However , E contradicts the first conclusion while supporting the second conclusion. But I think the main conclusion here is the first one and it is being supported by D.

Experts please comment....
Ananda Chakraborty

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 434
Joined: Mon Jun 11, 2007 9:48 pm
Location: Bangalore
Thanked: 6 times
GMAT Score:600

by viju9162 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:20 am
answer should be C
"Native of" is used for a individual while "Native to" is used for a large group

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 121
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2009 1:16 am
Thanked: 4 times
GMAT Score:720

by Naruto » Thu Jul 30, 2009 5:04 am
OA is E, i too fell for the C trap but later realised that even if traces of virus are found in the vaccine that does not proof its cause for the disease in patients it just re-affirms the contamination mentioned.

In E,
its like showing when cause does not occur the effect does not occur hence strengthens

Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Thu Jul 30, 2009 9:44 am
Me too.

Breaking down the stimulus, I agree that C is not the correct answer as it doesnt talk anything about the cause. It just affirms that traces polio vaccince has SV40 virus (supporting the premise)


C - SV40 virus --> Mesothelioma

P1 - 60 percent of tissue samples from mesotheliomas contain SV40 virus
P2 - In 1960, some polio vaccine was contaminated with the virus.

OA - E coz it states NO SV40 virus --> NO Mesothelioma. But I eliminated this as it appeared to be a mistaken negation. Any thoughts why it is not a mistaken negation?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Sat Sep 02, 2006 7:50 pm
Thanked: 10 times
Followed by:1 members

by ogbeni » Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:29 pm
Naruto nailed it with this:

"In E,
its like showing when cause does not occur the effect does not occur hence strengthens"

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 303
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:23 am

by joseph32 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:53 pm
Guys can anyone give a decent reason why E is not right.