CR

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:43 pm

CR

by mountainhillview » Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:46 pm
Parents and other citizens across the country frequently criticize schools for not doing their job. Most notably, they blame schools for low student achievement scores. Surprisingly, the most frequent and vociferous complaints come from those who live in districts where the achievement scores are high.
All of the following, considered individually, help to explain the apparent paradox EXCEPT:

A) Parents from districts of high achievers are very involved with the schools and are therefore more likely to make critical comments.

B) Parents and other citizens have no knowledge of their district's own scores.

C) High scores cause parents' expectations to rise, leading parents to demand that students achieve even more.

D) High-scoring districts contain low-achieving students whose parents are very likely to complain when they observe that their children's scores do not match those of children who live nearby.

E) Most complaints about schools come from political activists, most of whom live in high-achieving districts.


Somebody explain

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

Re: CR

by rahulg83 » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:30 am
mountainhillview wrote:Parents and other citizens across the country frequently criticize schools for not doing their job. Most notably, they blame schools for low student achievement scores. Surprisingly, the most frequent and vociferous complaints come from those who live in districts where the achievement scores are high.
All of the following, considered individually, help to explain the apparent paradox EXCEPT:

A) Parents from districts of high achievers are very involved with the schools and are therefore more likely to make critical comments.

B) Parents and other citizens have no knowledge of their district's own scores.

C) High scores cause parents' expectations to rise, leading parents to demand that students achieve even more.

D) High-scoring districts contain low-achieving students whose parents are very likely to complain when they observe that their children's scores do not match those of children who live nearby.

E) Most complaints about schools come from political activists, most of whom live in high-achieving districts.


Somebody explain
IMO B. This choice really does nothing to resolve the paradox..

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 377
Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:2 members

by schumi_gmat » Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:13 am
IMO B

Legendary Member
Posts: 594
Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
Thanked: 12 times

by nervesofsteel » Sat Jun 13, 2009 8:12 am
B

knowledge/ignorance of district's average score doesn't signify parents will complain...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:690

by Arsene Lupin » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:14 am
"C" is the answer.

Because it only talks about parents demanding stuff from the students, not from the schools.

"B" clearly explains the paradox by simply saying the parents are ignorants.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 385
Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
Thanked: 11 times
GMAT Score:740

by Domnu » Sat Jun 13, 2009 10:40 am
Arsene Lupin wrote:"C" is the answer.

Because it only talks about parents demanding stuff from the students, not from the schools.

"B" clearly explains the paradox by simply saying the parents are ignorants.
Just because the parents are ignorant, I don't think they would argue. However, C resolves the paradox, because if the students don't achieve more, it is highly implied that they would complain.
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2008 8:44 am
Thanked: 3 times
GMAT Score:690

by Arsene Lupin » Sat Jun 13, 2009 11:03 am
Domnu wrote:
Arsene Lupin wrote:"C" is the answer.

Because it only talks about parents demanding stuff from the students, not from the schools.

"B" clearly explains the paradox by simply saying the parents are ignorants.
Just because the parents are ignorant, I don't think they would argue. However, C resolves the paradox, because if the students don't achieve more, it is highly implied that they would complain.

Wow how did that go through!

It is also the only one that doesn't talk about high achieving districts, which is a key phrase that I didn't pay much attention to.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:07 am
Thanked: 7 times

by ket » Sat Jun 13, 2009 2:00 pm
I think its D

even if this is true that ' High-scoring districts contain low-achieving students whose parents are very likely to complain when they observe that their children's scores do not match those of children who live nearby.' this does not explain anything.

this sentence lacks the phrase ' High-scoring districts contain.... whose parents ... are more likely to complain than parents in other districts because simply saying that they are likely to complain does not resolve the fact that most complains come from high score districts...


I have also been thinking about E: What has political activism to do with that that parents are complaining? I think this does not resolve the paradox.. unless we assume ( which is not recommended in C/R) that political activists are more likely to express their point of view than others... but still after consideration maybe it is OK to make assumption about political activists here... so I removed this option.


I think B does resolve paradox, in that the paradox itself is that although the students of district have high scores still parents complain, this assumes that parent know the scores of their district i.e. know that the districts scores are superior and still complain. B says they don't know... if they knew they might not complain then....

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 10:17 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by eustudent » Sat Jun 13, 2009 4:46 pm
I think answer is D.

Parents would have no reason to complain, if the rest of the kidds, attending the same district score well. Then, problem is in their own kidds, because the rest of the kidds are representative of the good quality of the education in the district.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 109
Joined: Mon May 04, 2009 8:22 pm
Location: Indy
Thanked: 3 times

Re: CR

by amazonviper » Sat Jun 13, 2009 6:01 pm
mountainhillview wrote:Parents and other citizens across the country frequently criticize schools for not doing their job. Most notably, they blame schools for low student achievement scores. Surprisingly, the most frequent and vociferous complaints come from those who live in districts where the achievement scores are high.
All of the following, considered individually, help to explain the apparent paradox EXCEPT:

A) Parents from districts of high achievers are very involved with the schools and are therefore more likely to make critical comments.

B) Parents and other citizens have no knowledge of their district's own scores.

C) High scores cause parents' expectations to rise, leading parents to demand that students achieve even more.

D) High-scoring districts contain low-achieving students whose parents are very likely to complain when they observe that their children's scores do not match those of children who live nearby.

E) Most complaints about schools come from political activists, most of whom live in high-achieving districts.


Somebody explain
B
OA plz

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2009 11:43 pm

by mountainhillview » Sun Jun 14, 2009 1:53 am
B is the stated Answer


How can B be the answer. It clearly explains the paradox. It says the parents are ignorant, so blah blah..

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 93
Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2009 9:07 am
Thanked: 7 times

by ket » Sun Jun 14, 2009 2:37 am
confused :( if anyone could explain this one would be great...

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 39
Joined: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:25 pm
Thanked: 1 times

by yeloaw » Thu Jun 18, 2009 3:35 pm
Paradox: Surprisingly, the most frequent and vociferous complaints come from those who live in districts where the achievement scores are high.

B) Parents and other citizens have no knowledge of their district's own scores.

This doesn't explain the paradox because we do not know what causes complaints. (B) does not give us a reason why complaints are higher in high scoring districts. If parents knew their district had high scores, they may still complain, if they didn't know their district had high scores, they may still complain. Basically we don't know how they would react if they knew their district had high scores.

To explain the paradox we need to find out why complaints are higher in high scoring districts. All the other choices give a valid explanation.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 200
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2015 10:27 am

by james33 » Sun May 15, 2016 8:02 pm
I believe the answer should be B