What is the correct answer

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 08, 2006 8:56 am

What is the correct answer

by prarabh » Sat Jul 08, 2006 10:38 am
Advertisement: Do you want to be more energetic and physically fit? Take a daily supplement of Vita-Plus, a vitamin combination containing additional proprietary ingredients. Our Study using hundreds of volunteers show that just after 1 week of taking 2 capsules daily, participants report being more energetic and alert on average than the average level reported by national institute of health survey of all Americans

Which of the following will most strengthen the advertisements claim that vita-plus supplements make one more energetic and alert.

1) Those who voluntarily choose to take 2 capsules daily reported energy levels even greater than those who took only 2 capsules
2) The volunteers were randomly selected from all those who a newspaper advertisement and were willing to pay for the cost of Vita Plus capsules
3) At the beginning of the study, the volunteers' reports on alertness showed levels on average no different from the average level reported by National institute of health.
4) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or health inducing substance. Those volunteers also reported increased levels of alertness and energy
5) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or other health inducing substances. Those volunteers reported no increase in alertness or energy


I think the answer should be 3 but the official answer is 5. Can somebody explain why?

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun May 21, 2006 5:20 pm

by lan0583 » Sat Jul 08, 2006 2:22 pm
my answer is like yours. I dont know why the answer is 5.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:20 pm
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:5 members

Re: What is the correct answer

by 800guy » Sun Jul 09, 2006 12:01 pm
prarabh wrote:Advertisement: Do you want to be more energetic and physically fit? Take a daily supplement of Vita-Plus, a vitamin combination containing additional proprietary ingredients. Our Study using hundreds of volunteers show that just after 1 week of taking 2 capsules daily, participants report being more energetic and alert on average than the average level reported by national institute of health survey of all Americans

Which of the following will most strengthen the advertisements claim that vita-plus supplements make one more energetic and alert.

1) Those who voluntarily choose to take 2 capsules daily reported energy levels even greater than those who took only 2 capsules
2) The volunteers were randomly selected from all those who a newspaper advertisement and were willing to pay for the cost of Vita Plus capsules
3) At the beginning of the study, the volunteers' reports on alertness showed levels on average no different from the average level reported by National institute of health.
4) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or health inducing substance. Those volunteers also reported increased levels of alertness and energy
5) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or other health inducing substances. Those volunteers reported no increase in alertness or energy


I think the answer should be 3 but the official answer is 5. Can somebody explain why?
why i don't think it's 3: this answer talked about the volunteers alertness levels, but doesn't clarify anything about the effects of the capsules. also, doesn't clarify what kind of volunteers were selected. maybe these people in this group increased alertness because they were more prone to exercise and diet?

why the answer may be 5: focuses on how the capsules were distributed in a controlled scientfic manner: control and test subjects. implies that the volunteers that were selected represented the 'average' demographic, and that those who received placebo remained at average alterness.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Thu Jun 15, 2006 6:58 am
Location: Mumbai, India

by manishhemnani » Sun Jul 30, 2006 3:53 am
3) At the beginning of the study, the volunteers' reports on alertness showed levels on average no different from the average level reported by National institute of health.
4) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or health inducing substance. Those volunteers also reported increased levels of alertness and energy
5) Some of the volunteers were given capsules that solely contained cellulose, an inert substance with no vitamins or other health inducing substances. Those volunteers reported no increase in alertness or energy



I still think the answer is 3. Here a small group of people is compared with overall population. We know that after taking suppliments, the group is doing better than population average, but we can't say that the group is representative sample of overall population. It is nowhere mentioned that after taking suppliments, the group is doing better than it was doing before consuming the suppliments.
When the GOING gets TOUGH, the TOUGH gets GOING

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Fri Jul 21, 2006 11:02 am

by vinayjain » Thu Aug 10, 2006 10:52 am
A question for u 800guy what if the guyz who were given the vita capsules were the ones who excercised and dieted and thus their alertness leves increased.
then in tht case 5 doesent apply again.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 354
Joined: Tue Jun 27, 2006 9:20 pm
Thanked: 11 times
Followed by:5 members

by 800guy » Thu Aug 10, 2006 11:29 am
vinayjain wrote:A question for u 800guy what if the guyz who were given the vita capsules were the ones who excercised and dieted and thus their alertness leves increased.
then in tht case 5 doesent apply again.
if that were true, then you would be right that 5 wouldn't apply. but that detail isn't mentioned in the CR. i still like 5 the best because it sets up the experiment as having a test and a control...

this is a tough one!!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 2469
Joined: Thu Apr 20, 2006 12:09 pm
Location: BtG Underground
Thanked: 85 times
Followed by:14 members

by aim-wsc » Sun Aug 27, 2006 5:22 pm
same passage:
if you want to weaken the statement go for D
& for strengthen, E is the answer.

C seems convincing but what strengthens the Advertisers argument is the E.

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 15
Joined: Fri Mar 09, 2007 9:02 pm

by aficionado » Sat Mar 17, 2007 4:09 am
i can't see why E should be the answer. it is clearly out of scope. the answer has to be C., the question is not good, very ambiguous for Gmat levels.

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 2228
Joined: Wed Dec 27, 2006 3:28 pm
Location: Montreal, Canada
Thanked: 639 times
Followed by:694 members
GMAT Score:780

by Stacey Koprince » Mon Mar 19, 2007 8:40 pm
Can you tell us the source for this question? That might clear up the problem...
Please note: I do not use the Private Messaging system! I will not see any PMs that you send to me!!

Stacey Koprince
GMAT Instructor
Director of Online Community
Manhattan GMAT

Contributor to Beat The GMAT!

Learn more about me

Legendary Member
Posts: 559
Joined: Tue Mar 27, 2007 1:29 am
Thanked: 5 times
Followed by:2 members

by Cybermusings » Sun Apr 01, 2007 4:05 am
It's 5 for sure!

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 300
Joined: Fri Aug 09, 2013 2:26 am

by khanshainur » Sat Apr 16, 2016 6:57 am
Option 5 looks good. I'll go with 5.