124. It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people-that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills-suffices. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
(A) As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
(B) Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
(C) Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
(D) The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
(E) The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.
2016 GMAT official guide weaken Q
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 3
- Joined: Sun Jul 12, 2015 9:59 am
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Premise: The more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.katrizenis wrote:124. It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people-that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills-suffices
. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
(A) As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
(B) Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
(C) Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
(D) The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
(E) The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.
Conclusion: To maintain mental sharpness...social interaction suffices.
This is a CAUSAL ARGUMENT.
In a causal argument, events A and B are observed together, and the argument concludes that A causes B.
Here, social interaction and mental sharpness are observed together, and the argument concludes that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness.
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness.
One way to weaken a causal relationship is to introduce an ALTERNATE CAUSE.
Answer choice B:
Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
Here, a lack of mental sharpness and a lack of social interaction are both caused by MEDICAL CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS, weakening the conclusion that a lack of social interaction causes a lack of mental sharpness.
The correct answer is B.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- src_saurav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:27 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Mitch, i tried to reject the study here. I chose D as it says that study is based on past collected data.
Please explain.
Please explain.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
EVIDENCE...comes from A STUDY showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.src_saurav wrote:Mitch, i tried to reject the study here. I chose D as it says that study is based on past collected data.
Please explain.
Since the study provides EVIDENCE, the study serves as a PREMISE.
A premise is a FACT; it cannot be weakened.
Eliminate any answer choice that attempts to weaken a premise.
D: The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
Since D attempts to weaken the premise offered by the study, eliminate D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- src_saurav
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 145
- Joined: Sun Mar 15, 2015 7:27 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi Mitch,
Please explain when we can prove a study sample to be inconclusive.
Please explain when we can prove a study sample to be inconclusive.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
To weaken a SAMPLING CR, the correct answer will typically show that the SAMPLING is not representative of the WHOLE.src_saurav wrote:Hi Mitch,
Please explain when we can prove a study sample to be inconclusive.
Two examples:
https://www.beatthegmat.com/pls-explain-t283596.html
https://www.beatthegmat.com/people-who-h ... 85101.html
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 712
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2015 4:39 am
- Thanked: 14 times
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:Premise: The more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.katrizenis wrote:124. It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people-that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills-suffices
. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
(A) As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
(B) Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
(C) Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
(D) The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
(E) The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.
Conclusion: To maintain mental sharpness...social interaction suffices.
This is a CAUSAL ARGUMENT.
In a causal argument, events A and B are observed together, and the argument concludes that A causes B.
Here, social interaction and mental sharpness are observed together, and the argument concludes that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness.
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness.
One way to weaken a causal relationship is to introduce an ALTERNATE CAUSE.
Answer choice B:
Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
Here, a lack of mental sharpness and a lack of social interaction are both caused by MEDICAL CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS, weakening the conclusion that a lack of social interaction causes a lack of mental sharpness.
The correct answer is B.
Although I agree that B is the correct answer, I think it is not an alternate cause. I believe it is introducing a 3rd factor that muddle the relationship between social interaction and mental skills. Answer B is not on the ordinary form of giving direct alternate cause. For example, it does say that spending time with parents affect the mental skills.
What do you think??
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
B: Many medical conditions and treatments...adversely affect a person's mental sharpness.Mo2men wrote:Hi Mitch,
Although I agree that B is the correct answer, I think it is not an alternate cause. I believe it is introducing a 3rd factor that muddle the relationship between social interaction and mental skills. Answer B is not on the ordinary form of giving direct alternate cause. For example, it does say that spending time with parents affect the mental skills.
What do you think??
Here, a lack of mental sharpness is due not to social isolation but to an ALTERNATE CAUSE: many medical conditions and treatments.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
- gmat_for_life
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 75
- Joined: Fri Jun 26, 2015 7:43 am
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hello Mitch,
In one of your explanations provided above, you've written that'Here, social interaction and mental sharpness are observed together, and the argument concludes that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness.
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness. '
My question is that if A causes B, then can we directly negate both sides as in NOT A-> NOT B or should it be NOT B-> NOT A? Which correlation out of the two is being applied in this case?
Regards,
Amit
In one of your explanations provided above, you've written that'Here, social interaction and mental sharpness are observed together, and the argument concludes that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness.
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness. '
My question is that if A causes B, then can we directly negate both sides as in NOT A-> NOT B or should it be NOT B-> NOT A? Which correlation out of the two is being applied in this case?
Regards,
Amit
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Not quite.gmat_for_life wrote:My question is that if A causes B, then can we directly negate both sides as in NOT A-> NOT B or should it be NOT B-> NOT A? Which correlation out of the two is being applied in this case?
Regards,
Amit
A -> B does not imply that Not A -> Not B.
The wording here is unique.
From the passage:
The more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
This conclusion suggests that the relationship between social contact and mental skills is PROPORTIONATE:
A INCREASE in social contact leads to a proportionate INCREASE in mental skills.
A DECREASE in social contact leads to a proportionate DECREASE in mental skills.
Hence my statement above:
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Even if D is true, I think, it doesn't affect the CONCLUSION that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.GMATGuruNY wrote: EVIDENCE...comes from A STUDY showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Since the study provides EVIDENCE, the study serves as a PREMISE.
A premise is a FACT; it cannot be weakened.
Eliminate any answer choice that attempts to weaken a premise.
D: The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
Since D attempts to weaken the premise offered by the study, eliminate D.
Isn't it ?
NOT able to understand this!GMATGuruNY wrote: A -> B does not imply that Not A -> Not B.
GENERALLY, in a GMAT STRENGTHEN CR, if we've A caused B or A has led to B or If A then B, then any answer choice that indicates If NOT A then NOT B,should be a potential STRENGTHENER, I guess. (because MUST BE TRUE aspect doesn't hold true in a STRENGTHEN CR)
Am I correct ?
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Dear Mitch,GMATGuruNY wrote:Premise: The more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.katrizenis wrote:124. It is widely assumed that people need to engage in intellectual activities such as solving crossword puzzles or mathematics problems in order to maintain mental sharpness as they age. In fact, however, simply talking to other people-that is, participating in social interaction, which engages many mental and perceptual skills-suffices
. Evidence to this effect comes from a study showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the force of the evidence cited?
(A) As people grow older, they are often advised to keep exercising their physical and mental capacities in order to maintain or improve them.
(B) Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
(C) Many people are proficient both in social interactions and in solving mathematical problems.
(D) The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
(E) The tasks evaluating mental sharpness for which data were compiled by the study were more akin to mathematics problems than to conversation.
Conclusion: To maintain mental sharpness...social interaction suffices.
This is a CAUSAL ARGUMENT.
In a causal argument, events A and B are observed together, and the argument concludes that A causes B.
Here, social interaction and mental sharpness are observed together, and the argument concludes that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness.
Put another way, the argument concludes that a LACK of social interaction causes a LACK of mental sharpness.
One way to weaken a causal relationship is to introduce an ALTERNATE CAUSE.
Answer choice B:
Many medical conditions and treatments that adversely affect a person's mental sharpness also tend to increase that person's social isolation.
Here, a lack of mental sharpness and a lack of social interaction are both caused by MEDICAL CONDITIONS AND TREATMENTS, weakening the conclusion that a lack of social interaction causes a lack of mental sharpness.
The correct answer is B.
I marked option E and am still not clear as to why this is wrong ?
Will appreciate if you clear this doubt , Also
if you throw some light on how to identify and tackle such question.
Agreed that the premise states that social interaction CAUSES mental sharpness,
But if I go with the current correct option, doesn't it state that only social interaction and nothing else CAUSES mental sharpness?
How did you reach there or where am I thinking wrong ?
Please help me out!!
Regards
Teja
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
That is correct. The fact that the data comes from other studies does not really change anything.RBBmba@2014 wrote:Even if D is true, I think, it doesn't affect the CONCLUSION that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.GMATGuruNY wrote: EVIDENCE...comes from A STUDY showing that the more social contact people report, the better their mental skills.
Since the study provides EVIDENCE, the study serves as a PREMISE.
A premise is a FACT; it cannot be weakened.
Eliminate any answer choice that attempts to weaken a premise.
D: The study did not itself collect data but analyzed data bearing on the issue from prior studies.
Since D attempts to weaken the premise offered by the study, eliminate D.
Isn't it ?
Mitch's point is simply that A -> B does not IMPLY Not A -> Not B.RBBmba@2014 wrote:NOT able to understand this!GMATGuruNY wrote: A -> B does not imply that Not A -> Not B.
GENERALLY, in a GMAT STRENGTHEN CR, if we've A caused B or A has led to B or If A then B, then any answer choice that indicates If NOT A then NOT B,should be a potential STRENGTHENER, I guess. (because MUST BE TRUE aspect doesn't hold true in a STRENGTHEN CR)
Am I correct ?
In other words, the fact that A causes B cannot be used to conclude that if A is not the case then B is not the case.
B could be caused by things other than A.
If you drink too much you will get sick does not imply that if you do not drink too much you will never get sick.
Marty Murray
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
Perfect Scoring Tutor With Over a Decade of Experience
MartyMurrayCoaching.com
Contact me at [email protected] for a free consultation.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Hi,Marty Murray wrote:Mitch's point is simply that A -> B does not IMPLY Not A -> Not B.
In other words, the fact that A causes B cannot be used to conclude that if A is not the case then B is not the case.
B could be caused by things other than A.
If you drink too much you will get sick does not imply that if you do not drink too much you will never get sick.
Can you please let me know whether my following understanding is correct for STRENGTHEN CR ?
GENERALLY, in a GMAT STRENGTHEN CR, if we've A caused B or A has led to B or If A then B, then any answer choice that indicates If NOT A then NOT B,should be a potential STRENGTHENER, I guess. (because MUST BE TRUE aspect doesn't hold true in a STRENGTHEN CR)
Thoughts please!
Last edited by RBBmba@2014 on Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:19 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 944
- Joined: Wed May 30, 2012 8:21 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Timer
00:00
Your Answer
A
B
C
D
E
Global Stats
Marty - any update on the above Sir ?
Curious to know your thoughts!
Curious to know your thoughts!