Please explain!
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
Statistics
This topic has expert replies
-
prachi18oct
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 10:33 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
For GMAT purposes, Standard Deviation (SD) can often be thought of as "the average distance the data points are away from the mean."A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?
A). -1 and 9
B). 4 and 4
C). 3 and 5
D). 2 and 6
E). 0 and 8
So, with {0, 2, 4, 6, 8}, the mean is 4.
0 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
4 is 0 units away from the mean of 4.
6 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
8 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the SD can be thought of as the average of 4, 2, 0, 2, and 4. The average of these values is 2.4, so we'll say that the SD is about 2.4
Note: This, of course, isn't 100% accurate, but it's all you should really need for the GMAT.
Okay, so which pair of new numbers, when added to the original 5 numbers will yield a new SD that is closest to 2.4?
Well, to begin, it's useful to notice that each pair consists of numbers that are equidistant from the original mean of 4.
For example, in answer choice A, -1 is 5 units less than 4, and 6 is 5 units more than 4.
As such, add the two values in each answer choice will yield a mean of 4.
Okay, let's see what happens if we add -1 and 9 (answer choice A).
Well, -1 is 5 units away from the mean of 4, and 9 is 5 units away from the mean of 4. So, 5 and 5 will be added to 4, 2, 0, 2, and 4 to get a new SD. As you can see, this will result in a much larger SD.
Now, let's examine D (2 and 6)
Well, 2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4, and 6 is 2 units away from the mean. So, we'll be adding 2 and 2 to the five original differences of 4, 2, 0, 2, and 4. Since the average of 4, 2, 0, 2, and 4 is 2.4, adding differences of 2 and 2 should have the least effect on the original SD.
As such, the correct answer must be D
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
-
prachi18oct
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 269
- Joined: Sun Apr 27, 2014 10:33 pm
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:5 members
Hi Brent,
Thanks for your explanation.
Although I find this question quite different from usual ones.Is there any other approach also ?
What level should this question be ?
Thanks for your explanation.
Although I find this question quite different from usual ones.Is there any other approach also ?
What level should this question be ?
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I'd say it's 700+ level. Here's a more formal approach:
The set {0, 2, 4, 6, 8} has a mean of 4.
So, first we need to find the difference between each value and the mean.
0 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
4 is 0 units away from the mean of 4.
6 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
8 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the SD will equal the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4²)/5.
In other words, the SD = the square root of 40/5.
= the square root of 8
Okay, so which pair of new numbers, when added to the original 5 numbers will yield a new SD that is closest to the square root of 8?
Well, to begin, it's useful to notice that each pair consists of numbers that are equidistant from the original mean of 4.
For example, in answer choice A, -1 is 5 units less than 4, and 6 is 5 units more than 4.
As such, add the two values in each answer choice will yield a mean of 4.
Okay, let's see what happens if we add -1 and 9 (answer choice A).
Well, -1 is 5 units away from the mean of 4, and 9 is 5 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 5² + 5²)/7.
= the square root of 90/7.
= the square root of approximately 13
This is considerably larger than the original SD of sqrt(8)
Now let's skip a few answers and try answer choice D.
Here, 2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4, and 6 is 2 units away from the mean.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 2² + 2²)/7.
= the square root of 48/7.
= the square root of approximately 7
This one is pretty close to the original SD of sqrt(8).
In fact, if we check the other answer choices (lots of work!), we'll see that answer choice D is the best answer.
Cheers,
Brent
To begin, the SD formula looks like this:A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?
A). -1 and 9
B). 4 and 4
C). 3 and 5
D). 2 and 6
E). 0 and 8
The set {0, 2, 4, 6, 8} has a mean of 4.
So, first we need to find the difference between each value and the mean.
0 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
4 is 0 units away from the mean of 4.
6 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
8 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the SD will equal the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4²)/5.
In other words, the SD = the square root of 40/5.
= the square root of 8
Okay, so which pair of new numbers, when added to the original 5 numbers will yield a new SD that is closest to the square root of 8?
Well, to begin, it's useful to notice that each pair consists of numbers that are equidistant from the original mean of 4.
For example, in answer choice A, -1 is 5 units less than 4, and 6 is 5 units more than 4.
As such, add the two values in each answer choice will yield a mean of 4.
Okay, let's see what happens if we add -1 and 9 (answer choice A).
Well, -1 is 5 units away from the mean of 4, and 9 is 5 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 5² + 5²)/7.
= the square root of 90/7.
= the square root of approximately 13
This is considerably larger than the original SD of sqrt(8)
Now let's skip a few answers and try answer choice D.
Here, 2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4, and 6 is 2 units away from the mean.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 2² + 2²)/7.
= the square root of 48/7.
= the square root of approximately 7
This one is pretty close to the original SD of sqrt(8).
In fact, if we check the other answer choices (lots of work!), we'll see that answer choice D is the best answer.
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
I'd say this question is flirting on the edge of legitimacy (with regard to being a GMAT-worthy question).
The problem is that it takes too long to solve (unless there's a faster solution that I'm missing)
Cheers,
Brent
The problem is that it takes too long to solve (unless there's a faster solution that I'm missing)
Cheers,
Brent
Brent Hanneson - Creator of GMATPrepNow.com
GMAT/MBA Expert
-
Ian Stewart
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2621
- Joined: Mon Jun 02, 2008 3:17 am
- Location: Montreal
- Thanked: 1090 times
- Followed by:355 members
- GMAT Score:780
This actually is a real GMAT question, from one of the oldest versions of GMATPrep (though the original wording says "closest to" and not "close to"). It is, however, very different from almost every other standard deviation question I've seen. It's actually unlike almost every other GMAT question I've seen on any topic, because a proper mathematical proof here would take far too long. I gather we're meant to look at the original set and say "things in this set look like they're about 2 away from the mean", and then guess that the standard deviation won't change much if we add two new elements, each 2 away from the mean. I don't find that explanation all that satisfying though, because we don't get a very precise estimate of standard deviation just by eyeballing a set like this. The standard deviation here is actually closer to 3 than it is to 2.
Anyway, I wouldn't about this question. As long as you have a general idea of what standard deviation measures, you should be fine.
Anyway, I wouldn't about this question. As long as you have a general idea of what standard deviation measures, you should be fine.
For online GMAT math tutoring, or to buy my higher-level Quant books and problem sets, contact me at ianstewartgmat at gmail.com
ianstewartgmat.com
ianstewartgmat.com
-
talaangoshtari
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 154
- Joined: Wed May 21, 2014 4:29 am
- Thanked: 8 times
- Followed by:1 members
If we have the set S, a set of distinct positive integers. The standarad deviation must increase in which of the following?
A. The smallest number is increased to become equal to the median
I assume that S={1, 2, 3}. For this set, mean is equal to 2, and the distance of each number from the mean is equal to -1, 0, 1, the mean is zero.
A. Since the smallest number should be equal to the median, and the median of set S is 2, then for A, S={2, 2, 3}. The mean is equal to 2.33 and the distance of each number from the mean is -.33, -.33, .67.So, the mean of these three numbers is equal to 0.01/3, which is larger than zero.
Based on this logic, I thought that this sentence must be true, but A is not correct.
Would you please provide an example that helps me understand why it is incorrect?
A. The smallest number is increased to become equal to the median
I assume that S={1, 2, 3}. For this set, mean is equal to 2, and the distance of each number from the mean is equal to -1, 0, 1, the mean is zero.
A. Since the smallest number should be equal to the median, and the median of set S is 2, then for A, S={2, 2, 3}. The mean is equal to 2.33 and the distance of each number from the mean is -.33, -.33, .67.So, the mean of these three numbers is equal to 0.01/3, which is larger than zero.
Based on this logic, I thought that this sentence must be true, but A is not correct.
Would you please provide an example that helps me understand why it is incorrect?
-
DavidG@VeritasPrep
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2663
- Joined: Wed Jan 14, 2015 8:25 am
- Location: Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1153 times
- Followed by:128 members
- GMAT Score:770
This is where you went awry - the distance from 1 to 2 is 1, not -1. (When calculating a standard deviation, the distance from each term to the mean will always be a nonnegative number.)I assume that S={1, 2, 3}. For this set, mean is equal to 2, and the distance of each number from the mean is equal to -1, 0, 1, the mean is zero.
And you can think about this logically: the set of 1, 2, 3 is clearly more dispersed than the set of, say, 1, 1, 1.
The only time you'd have a standard deviation of 0 would be when every element of the set was exactly the same.
-
Amrabdelnaby
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 137
- Joined: Fri Nov 13, 2015 11:01 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:2 members
Here the average distance is 2.4 or 2 5/7 of the mean so we should pic numbers that has the same average distance from the mean
A has an average of 5 away from the mean
B has an average of 0 away from the mean
C has an average of 1 away from the mean
D has an average of 2 away from the mean
E has an average of 4 away from the mean
So D has the closest average away fro mean to the SD so its the right answer.
A has an average of 5 away from the mean
B has an average of 0 away from the mean
C has an average of 1 away from the mean
D has an average of 2 away from the mean
E has an average of 4 away from the mean
So D has the closest average away fro mean to the SD so its the right answer.
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:I'd say it's 700+ level. Here's a more formal approach:
To begin, the SD formula looks like this:A set of data consists of the following 5 numbers: 0,2,4,6, and 8. Which two numbers, if added to create a set of 7 numbers, will result in a new standard deviation that is close to the standard deviation for the original 5 numbers?
A). -1 and 9
B). 4 and 4
C). 3 and 5
D). 2 and 6
E). 0 and 8
The set {0, 2, 4, 6, 8} has a mean of 4.
So, first we need to find the difference between each value and the mean.
0 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
4 is 0 units away from the mean of 4.
6 is 2 units away from the mean of 4.
8 is 4 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the SD will equal the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4²)/5.
In other words, the SD = the square root of 40/5.
= the square root of 8
Okay, so which pair of new numbers, when added to the original 5 numbers will yield a new SD that is closest to the square root of 8?
Well, to begin, it's useful to notice that each pair consists of numbers that are equidistant from the original mean of 4.
For example, in answer choice A, -1 is 5 units less than 4, and 6 is 5 units more than 4.
As such, add the two values in each answer choice will yield a mean of 4.
Okay, let's see what happens if we add -1 and 9 (answer choice A).
Well, -1 is 5 units away from the mean of 4, and 9 is 5 units away from the mean of 4.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 5² + 5²)/7.
= the square root of 90/7.
= the square root of approximately 13
This is considerably larger than the original SD of sqrt(8)
Now let's skip a few answers and try answer choice D.
Here, 2 is 2 units away from the mean of 4, and 6 is 2 units away from the mean.
So, the new SD = the square root of (4² + 2² + 0² + 2² + 4² + 2² + 2²)/7.
= the square root of 48/7.
= the square root of approximately 7
This one is pretty close to the original SD of sqrt(8).
In fact, if we check the other answer choices (lots of work!), we'll see that answer choice D is the best answer.
Cheers,
Brent
