Can solve help with this one? Thanks in advance!
Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the
following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
approximate product
This topic has expert replies
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Are you sure you transcribed the question correctly?enokhroot wrote:Can solve help with this one? Thanks in advance!
Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the
following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
The products in D and E will always be the same distance from rst. So, they are equally good approximations.
If you plug in some values for r, s and t, you'll see what I mean.
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Here's an ALGEBRAIC approach.enokhroot wrote: Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
Let's EXPAND each answer choice.
a) (r + 1)st = rst + st. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is st
b) (r - 1)st = rst - st. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is st
c) r(s + 1)t = rst + rt. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rt
d) rs(t - 1) = rst - rs. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rs
e) rs(t + 1) = rst + rs. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rs
As we can see, the 5 answer choices differ from rst by st, st, rt, rs and rs
Since 0 < r < s < t, we can see that rs < rt < st
In other words, rs is the SMALLEST difference, which means the correct answer is EITHER D or E
Cheers,
Brent
- MartyMurray
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2131
- Joined: Mon Feb 03, 2014 9:26 am
- Location: https://martymurraycoaching.com/
- Thanked: 955 times
- Followed by:140 members
- GMAT Score:800
I had the same reaction that Brent had had and so I am going to use the following as the answer choices.enokhroot wrote:Can solve help with this one? Thanks in advance!
Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the
following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) r(s - 1)t
e) rs(t + 1)
As far as how to do it goes, I found two ways.
One is to realize that changing a smaller number and a larger number by equal amounts changes the smaller number more proportionally.
In this case, changing r by 1 changes r more proportionally than does changing s or t. In the extreme case, if r were to equal 1, then subtracting 1 from r reduces it by 100 percent, and makes (r-1)st = 0, which, given the answer choices, we have to figure is the worst possible approximation of rst.
So given that all the answer choices involve changing one of the factors by the same number, 1, then the way to most closely approximate rst is to change the biggest factor, t.
So choose e.
You could also do this, or illustrate this by plugging in numbers.
Let's keep it simple and go with r = 1, s = 2 and t = 3. So rst = 6
For the problem to make sense, whatever holds true for those must hold true for all possibilities such that 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers.
Going through the answer choices:
a) (1 + 1)(2)(3) = 12 Difference From rst: +100%
b) (1 - 1)(2)(3) = 0 Difference From rst: -100%
c) (1)(2 + 1)(3) = 9 Difference From rst: +50%
d) (1)(2 - 1)(3) = 3 Difference From rst: -50%
e) (1)(2)(3 + 1) = 8 Difference From rst: +33.33%
The smallest difference is created via choice e.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Here's the PLUGGING in values approach:enokhroot wrote:Can solve help with this one? Thanks in advance!
Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the
following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
Choose 3 integers for r, s and t such that 0 < r < s < t
How about r = 1, s = 2 and t = 3
So, rst = (1)(2)(3) = 6
Now plug these values into the answer choices.
a) (r + 1)st = (1 + 1)(2)(3) = 12
b) (r - 1)st = (1 - 1)(2)(3) = 0
c) r(s + 1)t = (1)(2 + 1)(3) = 9
d) rs(t - 1) = (1)(2)(3 - 1) = 4
e) rs(t + 1) = (1)(2)(3 + 1) = 8
Since D and E are both 2 away from 6, D and E are the best approximations.
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Sure, if you change the answer choices, the correct answer will change.Marty Murray wrote:I had the same reaction that Brent had had and so I am going to use the following as the answer choices.enokhroot wrote:Can solve help with this one? Thanks in advance!
Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the
following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) r(s - 1)t
e) rs(t + 1)
As far as how to do it goes, I found two ways.
One is to realize that changing a smaller number and a larger number by equal amounts changes the smaller number more proportionally.
In this case, changing r by 1 changes r more proportionally than does changing s or t. In the extreme case, if r were to equal 1, then subtracting 1 from r reduces it by 100 percent, and makes (r-1)st = 0, which, given the answer choices, we have to figure is the worst possible approximation of rst.
So given that all the answer choices involve changing one of the factors by the same number, 1, then the way to most closely approximate rst is to change the biggest factor, t.
So choose e.
You could also do this, or illustrate this by plugging in numbers.
Let's keep it simple and go with r = 1, s = 2 and t = 3. So rst = 6
For the problem to make sense, whatever holds true for those must hold true for all possibilities such that 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers.
Going through the answer choices:
a) (1 + 1)(2)(3) = 12 Difference From rst: +100%
b) (1 - 1)(2)(3) = 0 Difference From rst: -100%
c) (1)(2 + 1)(3) = 9 Difference From rst: +50%
d) (1)(2 - 1)(3) = 3 Difference From rst: -50%
e) (1)(2)(3 + 1) = 8 Difference From rst: +33.33%
The smallest difference is created via choice e.
But, if you keep the answer choices as they originally were, then both are 33 1/3% away from 6.
Cheers,
Brent
Thanks Brett, this is what I was looking for!
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Here's an ALGEBRAIC approach.enokhroot wrote: Given 0 < r < s < t where r, s, and t are integers, which of the following best approximates rst:
a) (r + 1)st
b) (r - 1)st
c) r(s + 1)t
d) rs(t - 1)
e) rs(t + 1)
Let's EXPAND each answer choice.
a) (r + 1)st = rst + st. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is st
b) (r - 1)st = rst - st. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is st
c) r(s + 1)t = rst + rt. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rt
d) rs(t - 1) = rst - rs. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rs
e) rs(t + 1) = rst + rs. The DIFFERENCE between this value and rst is rs
As we can see, the 5 answer choices differ from rst by st, st, rt, rs and rs
Since 0 < r < s < t, we can see that rs < rt < st
In other words, rs is the SMALLEST difference, which means the correct answer is EITHER D or E
Cheers,
Brent