In an effort to reduce the number of fires started by cigarettes, a major tobacco company is test-marketing a cigarette in which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, thereby slowing the rate at which it burns and lowering the heat it generates.
A.in which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, thereby slowing
B.in which they use thin layers of extra paper in decreasing the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, which slows
C.that uses thin layers of extra paper to decrease the amount of oxygen when it enters the cigarette, thereby slowing
D.for which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen that enters the cigarette, and thereby slowing
E.using thin layers of extra paper in decreasing the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, which slows
Tobacco SC
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 594
- Joined: Thu Aug 14, 2008 11:51 pm
- Thanked: 12 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 10:50 am
IMO A. What is the OA?
B. they cannot refer to tobacco company,
B. use thin layer of extra paper "in decreasing" (sounds incorrect)
C. when "it" enters the cigarrette. what enters.. the oxygen or the thin paper.
D. "and" is not required
E. "in decreasing" same as in B
B. they cannot refer to tobacco company,
B. use thin layer of extra paper "in decreasing" (sounds incorrect)
C. when "it" enters the cigarrette. what enters.. the oxygen or the thin paper.
D. "and" is not required
E. "in decreasing" same as in B
trying for a perfect score... 800..
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 3:55 am
The answer is 'A'
B.
- Uses they (no plural noun)
C.
that uses (cigarette that uses wrong)
D.
and not required.
E.
using (is wrong here)(it seems like cigarette is using something for itself)
B.
- Uses they (no plural noun)
C.
that uses (cigarette that uses wrong)
D.
and not required.
E.
using (is wrong here)(it seems like cigarette is using something for itself)
I'm not sure about D,
1."for which" vs."in which", I guess "in which" is a little better as it seems more concrete, but for which is also fine.
2. "entering the cigarette" vs"that enters the cigarette", both are OK, a red herring.
3."thereby"vs"and thereby",both are OK. in the case of "thereby", it is a conjunction, and followed by an elliptical form of "to slow"---"slowing"; in the case of "and thereby", "and" is conjunction and "thereby"is an adverb, which also followed by an ellipitcal "slowing" (I guess "slow" should be parallel to "decrease")
Am I right about all the above ideas? Please correct me if anything is wrong.
thank you very much!
1."for which" vs."in which", I guess "in which" is a little better as it seems more concrete, but for which is also fine.
2. "entering the cigarette" vs"that enters the cigarette", both are OK, a red herring.
3."thereby"vs"and thereby",both are OK. in the case of "thereby", it is a conjunction, and followed by an elliptical form of "to slow"---"slowing"; in the case of "and thereby", "and" is conjunction and "thereby"is an adverb, which also followed by an ellipitcal "slowing" (I guess "slow" should be parallel to "decrease")
Am I right about all the above ideas? Please correct me if anything is wrong.
thank you very much!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
"for which" is wrong.Kajiabeat wrote:1."for which" vs."in which", I guess "in which" is a little better as it seems more concrete, but for which is also fine.
this isn't an idiom issue -- it's an issue of literal meaning: these things happen in the cigarette, not "for" the cigarette.
yes.2. "entering the cigarette" vs"that enters the cigarette", both are OK, a red herring.
this is incorrect. "thereby" is an adjective, and so may be ignored in a grammatical analysis. (it can't be ignored in an analysis of the meaning of the sentence, but, like other adverbs and adjectives, it has no effect on grammar.)3."thereby"vs"and thereby",both are OK. in the case of "thereby", it is a conjunction, and followed by an elliptical form of "to slow"---"slowing"; in the case of "and thereby", "and" is conjunction and "thereby"is an adverb, which also followed by an ellipitcal "slowing" (I guess "slow" should be parallel to "decrease")
therefore, and + thereby + --ing has the same restrictions and grammatical significance as and + --ing; same for the construction without "and".
"and (+ thereby) + slowing" is incorrect, because "slowing" is not parallel to anything in the earlier part of the sentence. (i don't know what "elliptical form" means, so i can't comment on that.)
comma (+ thereby) + slowing is correct -- it modifies the action of the preceding clause, as is required of COMMA + --ING modifiers.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
- Location: Chennai, India
- Thanked: 206 times
- Followed by:43 members
- GMAT Score:640
aj5105 wrote:In an effort to reduce the number of fires started by cigarettes, a major tobacco company is test-marketing a cigarette in which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, thereby slowing the rate at which it burns and lowering the heat it generates.
A.in which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, thereby slowing
B.in which they use thin layers of extra paper in decreasing the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, which slows
C.that uses thin layers of extra paper to decrease the amount of oxygen when it enters the cigarette, thereby slowing
D.for which thin layers of extra paper are used to decrease the amount of oxygen that enters the cigarette, and thereby slowing
E.using thin layers of extra paper in decreasing the amount of oxygen entering the cigarette, which slows
Answer is A
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi saurabh99,
There are a few problems with answer C:
1) The word "when" is supposed to reference a specific time, but there isn't a specific time that oxygen enters a cigarette.
2) The pronoun "it" is vague.
3) The verbs "enters" and "slowing" are not parallel.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
There are a few problems with answer C:
1) The word "when" is supposed to reference a specific time, but there isn't a specific time that oxygen enters a cigarette.
2) The pronoun "it" is vague.
3) The verbs "enters" and "slowing" are not parallel.
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
i received a private message about this thread.
clearly, oxygen does enter a cigarette at some point in time. and, in a different context, this sort of construction could totally make sense.
e.g., This cigarette causes oxygen to cool rapidly when the oxygen enters the filter --> the oxygen actually cools at that specific time.
the problem is that, in the context of this problem, the construction is nonsense.
taken literally, "decrease the amount of oxygen when it enters the cigarette" suggests that there's X amount of oxygen prior to entry, but, WHEN that oxygen enters the cigarette, the quantity is reduced to some fraction of X amount.
clearly nonsense-a cigarette can't destroy atoms of an element.
^^ not really.1) The word "when" is supposed to reference a specific time, but there isn't a specific time that oxygen enters a cigarette.
clearly, oxygen does enter a cigarette at some point in time. and, in a different context, this sort of construction could totally make sense.
e.g., This cigarette causes oxygen to cool rapidly when the oxygen enters the filter --> the oxygen actually cools at that specific time.
the problem is that, in the context of this problem, the construction is nonsense.
taken literally, "decrease the amount of oxygen when it enters the cigarette" suggests that there's X amount of oxygen prior to entry, but, WHEN that oxygen enters the cigarette, the quantity is reduced to some fraction of X amount.
clearly nonsense-a cigarette can't destroy atoms of an element.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
in context, it's clear that "it" = oxygen, and oxygen is a singular noun. for the GMAT, that's good enough.2) The pronoun "it" is vague.
more importantly, talking about "vague pronouns" sets a bad precedent for the GMAT, which tests no such thing.
if the GMAT tests a pronoun error, that error will be black-and-white. e.g., singular pronoun vs. plural noun, or pronoun vs. something that isn't a noun.
trying to eliminate "vague pronouns" is going to lead to a very large frequency of false positives (= inadvertently eliminating the correct answer).
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron