Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs
that enable a family with insufficient savings for a
conventional down payment to be able to move into
new housing and to apply part of the rent to a
purchase later.
(A) programs that enable a family with insufficient
savings for a conventional down payment to be
able to move into new housing and to apply
(B) programs that enable a family with insufficient
savings for a conventional down payment to
move into new housing and to apply
(C)programs; that enables a family with insufficient
savings for a conventional down payment to
move into new housing, to apply
(D) programs, which enables a family with
insufficient savings for a conventional down
payment to move into new housing, applying
(E) programs, which enable a family with insufficient
savings for a conventional down payment to be
able to move into new housing, applying
in d and e applying modifes family instead of rent-to-buy program
is my reasoning correct
modifier issue expert
- rishimaharaj
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:18 am
- Location: Florida
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:7 members
- GMAT Score:710
Hello Arghya05,
I think you are correct. It seems that "applying" is modifying "programs" on account of the pair of commas:
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs,....., applying part of the rent to a purchase later.
Because of the incorrect modification, this construction makes no sense, which allows us to eliminate both D and E.
I think the correct answer is B
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
1. Subject/Verb agreement:
programs (plural subject) goes with enable (plural verb). So C and D are incorrect.
2. Parallelism :
"to move into new housing" and "to apply part of the rent" is correct. So E is incorrect.
This leaves A and B.
A seems unnecessarily wordy with the phrase "to be able to," which is why I'd choose B as the correct answer.
Hope this helps!
--Rishi
I think you are correct. It seems that "applying" is modifying "programs" on account of the pair of commas:
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs,....., applying part of the rent to a purchase later.
Because of the incorrect modification, this construction makes no sense, which allows us to eliminate both D and E.
I think the correct answer is B
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
1. Subject/Verb agreement:
programs (plural subject) goes with enable (plural verb). So C and D are incorrect.
2. Parallelism :
"to move into new housing" and "to apply part of the rent" is correct. So E is incorrect.
This leaves A and B.
A seems unnecessarily wordy with the phrase "to be able to," which is why I'd choose B as the correct answer.
Hope this helps!
--Rishi
- Target2009
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:5 members
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Rishi,rishimaharaj wrote:Hello Arghya05,
I think you are correct. It seems that "applying" is modifying "programs" on account of the pair of commas:
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs,....., applying part of the rent to a purchase later.
Because of the incorrect modification, this construction makes no sense, which allows us to eliminate both D and E.
I think the correct answer is B
Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs that enable a family with insufficient savings for a conventional down payment to move into new housing and to apply part of the rent to a purchase later.
1. Subject/Verb agreement:
programs (plural subject) goes with enable (plural verb). So C and D are incorrect.
2. Parallelism :
"to move into new housing" and "to apply part of the rent" is correct. So E is incorrect.
This leaves A and B.
A seems unnecessarily wordy with the phrase "to be able to," which is why I'd choose B as the correct answer.
Hope this helps!
--Rishi
Just want to correct one thing in your explanation that any ing form except including and implementing doesn't modify the preceding noun rather modifies the whole phrase, therefore, in the above E option applying is not modifying programs.......
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
But I don't feel that here programs is the subject, if there is a subject then it's many house builders.....plz correct me if I am wrongarghya05 wrote:no i guess you are missing a point , ing modifier are adverbial they modify the entire action,but
there is also a initiator or main subject who performs the action
- rishimaharaj
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 90
- Joined: Mon May 02, 2011 11:18 am
- Location: Florida
- Thanked: 20 times
- Followed by:7 members
- GMAT Score:710
Hi all,
I think aspirant2001 is correct by saying that "many house builders" is the subject. The sentence could be a complete thought if you put a period after programs:
"Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs."
Aspriant2011,
I am not yet knowledgeable about the specifics which you brought up regarding ing form and modification. Do you have any links/resources to share to read up more on that?
Thanks,
--Rishi
I think aspirant2001 is correct by saying that "many house builders" is the subject. The sentence could be a complete thought if you put a period after programs:
"Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs."
Aspriant2011,
I am not yet knowledgeable about the specifics which you brought up regarding ing form and modification. Do you have any links/resources to share to read up more on that?
Thanks,
--Rishi
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
U would have to search BTG, there would be links available for this ing concept.I didn't bookmark any such link therefore unable to paste the same....rishimaharaj wrote:Hi all,
I think aspirant2001 is correct by saying that "many house builders" is the subject. The sentence could be a complete thought if you put a period after programs:
"Many house builders offer rent-to-buy programs."
Aspriant2011,
I am not yet knowledgeable about the specifics which you brought up regarding ing form and modification. Do you have any links/resources to share to read up more on that?
Thanks,
--Rishi
- Brian@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 1031
- Joined: Thu Jul 03, 2008 1:23 pm
- Location: Malibu, CA
- Thanked: 716 times
- Followed by:255 members
- GMAT Score:750
Hey guys,
Great discussion - a few thoughts here:
1) As arghya05 said, the -ing modifiers can modify an entire clause or action, and that's how that modifier "applying..." is working here. A few examples:
Congress took great strides toward a balanced budget, raising the debt ceiling but also repealing many upper-class tax cuts.
Here, "raising" and "repealing" modify the whole action of taking strides toward a balanced budget. You'd call this an "adverbial modifier" - the -ing word takes on the role of an adverb, not modifying the noun but rather the entire action.
Brian showed his political leanings, using a grammatical example to showcase his desires for upcoming legislation.
Again, the -ing modifier here, "using" modifies the entire action, not just the subject of the sentence.
So... in this sentence, "applying part of the rent" describes HOW the program enables these families to move into new housing. "Applying" describes the action "enable".
2) So it's not "applying" as a modifier that's wrong in D or E. Actually, I'd prefer that phrasing in D or E if it weren't for fatal flaws:
D - uses "enables" (singular) as the verb for "programs" (plural)
E - uses really redundant phrasing: "enables families...to be able to"
So I guess you do have to go with B here, but I could easily see this question rewritten such that it takes advantage of the fact that the second action - applying rent to a later downpayment - is really what makes the first - affording a new house - possible.
Great discussion - a few thoughts here:
1) As arghya05 said, the -ing modifiers can modify an entire clause or action, and that's how that modifier "applying..." is working here. A few examples:
Congress took great strides toward a balanced budget, raising the debt ceiling but also repealing many upper-class tax cuts.
Here, "raising" and "repealing" modify the whole action of taking strides toward a balanced budget. You'd call this an "adverbial modifier" - the -ing word takes on the role of an adverb, not modifying the noun but rather the entire action.
Brian showed his political leanings, using a grammatical example to showcase his desires for upcoming legislation.
Again, the -ing modifier here, "using" modifies the entire action, not just the subject of the sentence.
So... in this sentence, "applying part of the rent" describes HOW the program enables these families to move into new housing. "Applying" describes the action "enable".
2) So it's not "applying" as a modifier that's wrong in D or E. Actually, I'd prefer that phrasing in D or E if it weren't for fatal flaws:
D - uses "enables" (singular) as the verb for "programs" (plural)
E - uses really redundant phrasing: "enables families...to be able to"
So I guess you do have to go with B here, but I could easily see this question rewritten such that it takes advantage of the fact that the second action - applying rent to a later downpayment - is really what makes the first - affording a new house - possible.
Brian Galvin
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
GMAT Instructor
Chief Academic Officer
Veritas Prep
Looking for GMAT practice questions? Try out the Veritas Prep Question Bank. Learn More.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Brian, thnks for your response.I am just curious to know about the subject in option D & option E. Please help me on that.....Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:Hey guys,
Great discussion - a few thoughts here:
1) As arghya05 said, the -ing modifiers can modify an entire clause or action, and that's how that modifier "applying..." is working here. A few examples:
Congress took great strides toward a balanced budget, raising the debt ceiling but also repealing many upper-class tax cuts.
Here, "raising" and "repealing" modify the whole action of taking strides toward a balanced budget. You'd call this an "adverbial modifier" - the -ing word takes on the role of an adverb, not modifying the noun but rather the entire action.
Brian showed his political leanings, using a grammatical example to showcase his desires for upcoming legislation.
Again, the -ing modifier here, "using" modifies the entire action, not just the subject of the sentence.
So... in this sentence, "applying part of the rent" describes HOW the program enables these families to move into new housing. "Applying" describes the action "enable".
2) So it's not "applying" as a modifier that's wrong in D or E. Actually, I'd prefer that phrasing in D or E if it weren't for fatal flaws:
D - uses "enables" (singular) as the verb for "programs" (plural)
E - uses really redundant phrasing: "enables families...to be able to"
So I guess you do have to go with B here, but I could easily see this question rewritten such that it takes advantage of the fact that the second action - applying rent to a later downpayment - is really what makes the first - affording a new house - possible.
- arghya05
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:38 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:1 members
simple if enable is the main verb the the subject is rent program
in sc structure
S1(in sc structure subject),s2(which.................,)ing
ing modifes the preceding clause before comma that is s2
correct me if i am wrong
in sc structure
S1(in sc structure subject),s2(which.................,)ing
ing modifes the preceding clause before comma that is s2
correct me if i am wrong
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 23
- Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:37 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- Followed by:1 members
Thanks Brian. This was very enlightening. I always wondered about the OG explanation for these choices. They appear to be incorrect!!Brian@VeritasPrep wrote:
So... in this sentence, "applying part of the rent" describes HOW the program enables these families to move into new housing. "Applying" describes the action "enable".
2) So it's not "applying" as a modifier that's wrong in D or E. Actually, I'd prefer that phrasing in D or E if it weren't for fatal flaws:
D - uses "enables" (singular) as the verb for "programs" (plural)
E - uses really redundant phrasing: "enables families...to be able to"
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 46
- Joined: Wed Mar 10, 2010 8:54 am
- Followed by:1 members
Brian,
Thanks for pointing out that "Applying" describes the action "enable".
Ron/Brian,
Could you please resolve my below said queries.
1)In my opinion ,in D and E, "Applying" should also refer to the subject of the previous clause that is "Programs".
In my opinion, its not the "Programs" that are "Applying" but the families, and thus to me the usage seems to be wrong.
2)Also, the OG says :for D, applying following a non restrictive clause suggest incorrectly that the Builders. and not the families, are applying the rent.
Please explain.
3)In general:
What does Comma +Ing modifier modifies in case there is a non-restrictive clause with or without comma before the modifier.
Please clarify.
Thanks!!!
Thanks for pointing out that "Applying" describes the action "enable".
Ron/Brian,
Could you please resolve my below said queries.
1)In my opinion ,in D and E, "Applying" should also refer to the subject of the previous clause that is "Programs".
In my opinion, its not the "Programs" that are "Applying" but the families, and thus to me the usage seems to be wrong.
2)Also, the OG says :for D, applying following a non restrictive clause suggest incorrectly that the Builders. and not the families, are applying the rent.
Please explain.
3)In general:
What does Comma +Ing modifier modifies in case there is a non-restrictive clause with or without comma before the modifier.
Please clarify.
Thanks!!!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- lunarpower
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3380
- Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 1:20 am
- Thanked: 2256 times
- Followed by:1535 members
- GMAT Score:800
keep in mind that you're looking at *wrong* answers here.
in the two choices (d) and (e), "applying..." shouldn't be a modifier at all, because it doesn't actually *modify* anything in the preceding clause -- it gives another, separate aspect of the programs. (number one, the families can move into new housing; number two, the families can apply part of the rent to a later purchase. these are different things.)
so there's really no sense in nitpicking over what it can or can't modify, because it shouldn't be a modifier at all.
also, bear in mind that there is some flexibility here -- if a comma + -ING modifier follows a complex expression that has more than one subject+verb pair, then you may have to use a certain amount of common sense to distinguish what is modified.
the modifier still must modify the same rules, but could refer to either of the subject/verb combinations.
e.g.
i carried a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, supporting them with nutrients and heat.
here, the comma -ing modifier modifies only the second subject+verb pair. shown in color:
i carried a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, supporting them with nutrients and heat.
VS.
i dropped a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, breaking two of them and endangering the chicks' lives.
here, the comma -ing modifier modifies the entire preceding clause. shown in color:
i dropped a bag (containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks), breaking two of them and endangering the chicks' lives.
in the two choices (d) and (e), "applying..." shouldn't be a modifier at all, because it doesn't actually *modify* anything in the preceding clause -- it gives another, separate aspect of the programs. (number one, the families can move into new housing; number two, the families can apply part of the rent to a later purchase. these are different things.)
so there's really no sense in nitpicking over what it can or can't modify, because it shouldn't be a modifier at all.
also, bear in mind that there is some flexibility here -- if a comma + -ING modifier follows a complex expression that has more than one subject+verb pair, then you may have to use a certain amount of common sense to distinguish what is modified.
the modifier still must modify the same rules, but could refer to either of the subject/verb combinations.
e.g.
i carried a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, supporting them with nutrients and heat.
here, the comma -ing modifier modifies only the second subject+verb pair. shown in color:
i carried a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, supporting them with nutrients and heat.
VS.
i dropped a bag containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks, breaking two of them and endangering the chicks' lives.
here, the comma -ing modifier modifies the entire preceding clause. shown in color:
i dropped a bag (containing six incubators that enclosed baby chicks), breaking two of them and endangering the chicks' lives.
Ron has been teaching various standardized tests for 20 years.
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron
--
Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete chiedere domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
--
Quand on se sent bien dans un vêtement, tout peut arriver. Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
Yves Saint-Laurent
--
Learn more about ron