Value of |x|

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 95
Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:53 am
Location: United States
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:5 members

Value of |x|

by tanvis1120 » Tue Aug 19, 2014 2:41 pm
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0

My approach:
Statement 1:
|x+1|=2|x-1|

Removing modulus gives,
+-(x+1) = +-2(x-1)

The above equation can be solved for 4 values (Using the combinations of x+1 and x-1 below:

+ + ; x = 3
+ - ; x = 1/3
- + ; x = 1/3
- - ; x = 3
Thus, x= 3 or 1/3


Statement 2:
|x - 3| > 0

Removing the Modulus:
+-(x-3) > 0
This gives, x>3 or x<3

Statements 1+2:
If x= 3
|x-3| = 0

If x = 1/3
|x-3| >0

So, if x = 1/3, it satisfies statement 2.
Thus,-1<x<1, |x|<1 is true.

So, answer is C.

Please let me know if it is correct, experts!

Thank You!

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:49 pm
Hi tanvis1120,

Yes, your solution is correct.

Fact 1 has just 2 solutions (the "equals" sign and the absolute value symbols are a bit of a hint that there are probably 2 solutions). Fact 2 has an unlimited number of solutions (anything BUT the number 3). When combining statements, there is just 1 overlapping answer.

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1100
Joined: Sat May 10, 2014 11:34 pm
Location: New Delhi, India
Thanked: 205 times
Followed by:24 members

by GMATinsight » Tue Aug 19, 2014 5:58 pm
tanvis1120 wrote:Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0

My approach:
Statement 1:
|x+1|=2|x-1|
Thus, x= 3 or 1/3


Statement 2:
|x - 3| > 0

Removing the Modulus:
+-(x-3) > 0
This gives, x>3 or x<3

Statements 1+2:
If x= 3
|x-3| = 0

If x = 1/3
|x-3| >0

So, if x = 1/3, it satisfies statement 2.
Thus,-1<x<1, |x|<1 is true.

So, answer is C.

Please let me know if it is correct, experts!

Thank You!
All is correct. Just another way to look at Statement 2 is

Given : |x - 3| > 0
Ask yourself what's so special about it, Modulus of anything is always greater than or Equal to Zero
Here this only says it's Greater than which mean that |x - 3| is just not zero
i.e. x is just NOT 3

WHich when combining the two statements removes one of the solutions from the two solutions obtained from first statement and we get x = 1/3 only

Answer: Option C
"GMATinsight"Bhoopendra Singh & Sushma Jha
Most Comprehensive and Affordable Video Course 2000+ CONCEPT Videos and Video Solutions
Whatsapp/Mobile: +91-9999687183 l [email protected]
Contact for One-on-One FREE ONLINE DEMO Class Call/e-mail
Most Efficient and affordable One-On-One Private tutoring fee - US$40-50 per hour

User avatar
MBA Admissions Consultant
Posts: 2279
Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2011 7:51 am
Location: New York
Thanked: 660 times
Followed by:266 members
GMAT Score:770

by Jim@StratusPrep » Sun Aug 24, 2014 10:52 am
Your approach is perfect. Well done with the math!

One thing to add is to check your solutions when doing the +/- calculation with absolute value. It is a bit of a work around and sometimes you can get solutions that in fact do not work when plugged back in. Not the case here, but worth remembering.
GMAT Answers provides a world class adaptive learning platform.
-- Push button course navigation to simplify planning
-- Daily assignments to fit your exam timeline
-- Organized review that is tailored based on your abiility
-- 1,000s of unique GMAT questions
-- 100s of handwritten 'digital flip books' for OG questions
-- 100% Free Trial and less than $20 per month after.
-- Free GMAT Quantitative Review

Image

Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by j_shreyans » Thu Oct 02, 2014 11:34 pm
Hey Guys ,

Can anyone pls solve this question.

I want to see the proper solution because i am bit confused in this.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 03, 2014 2:12 am
Is |x| < 1 ?

(1) |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|

(2) |x - 3| > 0
Statement 1: |x + 1| = 2|x - 1|
Case 1: No signs changed
x+1 = 2(x-1)
x+1 = 2x - 2
3 = x.

Case 2: Signs changed in ONE of the absolute values
-(x+1) = 2(x-1)
-x-1 = 2x - 2
-3x = -1
x = 1/3.

Since |x|>1 in Case 1 but |x|<1 in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: |x - 3| > 0
Case 3: No signs changed
x-3 > 0
x > 3

Case 4: Signs changed in the absolute value
-(x-3) > 0
-x + 3 > 0
-x > -3
x < 3.

The resulting inequalities -- x<3 or x>3 -- imply that x≠3.
If x=0, then |x|<1.
If x=10, then |x|>1.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Statement 1 requires that x=3 or x=1/3.
Statement 2 requires that x≠3.
Thus, x=1/3, with the result that |x| < 1.
SUFFICIENT.

The correct answer is C.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by j_shreyans » Fri Oct 03, 2014 9:24 am
Hi Guru ,

Thanks for the explanation , it helps me a lot .

One more thing which i want to be cleared is that.

Case 2: Signs changed in ONE of the absolute values
-(x+1) = 2(x-1)
-x-1 = 2x - 2
-3x = -1
x = 1/3.


In the above case why cant we change the sign on both side like below.

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)

Pls suggest me.

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:32 am
j_shreyans wrote:Hi Guru ,

Thanks for the explanation , it helps me a lot .

One more thing which i want to be cleared is that.

Case 2: Signs changed in ONE of the absolute values
-(x+1) = 2(x-1)
-x-1 = 2x - 2
-3x = -1
x = 1/3.


In the above case why cant we change the sign on both side like below.

-(x+1) = -2(x-1)

Pls suggest me.
Changing the sign on both sides of an equation is the equivalent of multiplying both sides by -1.
When both sides of an equation are multiplied by the same value, the equation does not change.
Thus, the solution for the -(x+1) = -2(x-1) will the same as the solution for x+1 = 2(x-1):
-(x+1) = -2(x-1)
-x - 1 = -2x + 2
x = 3.
As shown in the my post above, x=3 is also the solution for x+1 = 2(x-1).

Since both cases will yield the same solution, there is no reason to change the sign on both sides of the equation.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3

Legendary Member
Posts: 510
Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2014 2:24 am
Thanked: 3 times
Followed by:5 members

by j_shreyans » Fri Oct 03, 2014 10:45 am
Thank you so much Guru for your help , it really helps.