Hi,
Kindly help me understand this question!
The rain has flooded drainage canals in many orange-tree groves, which has caused the fruit to fall before it will ripen and also threatened to kill the trees.
a) which has caused the fruit to fall before it will ripen and also threatened to kill
b) which not only caused the fruit to fall without ripening, but also threatened killing
c) not only causing the fruit to fall before ripening, but also threatening to kill
d) causing the fruit to fall before it will ripen, which will threaten killing
e) causing the fruit to have fallen before it ripened, which threatened to kill
The rain has flooded drainage canals in many orange-tree gro
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 11:26 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Last edited by Joseph_Alexander on Wed Jul 30, 2014 7:47 am, edited 1 time in total.
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 11:26 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
I doubt.. "caused" should have been rather "causing". As per the rule, verb+ed form should go the nearest object; if that's the case, then the meaning is changed. Maybe, there is some typo??Uva@90 wrote:Does they test the Idiom '....Not only....but also...' ?
R A H U L
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 11:26 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Hey all,
Thanks for your assistance. I got a good explanation from another forum. Thought I will share it here.
Option A & B - Eliminate as 'which' is used incorrectly here. 'Which' always modifies the nearest grammatically eligible word. So, in A and B, which modifies orange-tree groves, suggesting that orange-tree groves caused the fruit to fall; however, from the context, it is clear that flooding of drainage canals caused the fruit to fall.
Option C - Correct. Error free. Not only but also idiom also matches!
Option D - The future tense 'will ripen' makes no sense
Option E - The present perfect infinitive 'to have fallen' makes no sense
Cheers & Best wishes with your preparations!
Thanks for your assistance. I got a good explanation from another forum. Thought I will share it here.
Option A & B - Eliminate as 'which' is used incorrectly here. 'Which' always modifies the nearest grammatically eligible word. So, in A and B, which modifies orange-tree groves, suggesting that orange-tree groves caused the fruit to fall; however, from the context, it is clear that flooding of drainage canals caused the fruit to fall.
Option C - Correct. Error free. Not only but also idiom also matches!
Option D - The future tense 'will ripen' makes no sense
Option E - The present perfect infinitive 'to have fallen' makes no sense
Cheers & Best wishes with your preparations!
- Uva@90
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 490
- Joined: Thu Jul 04, 2013 7:30 am
- Location: Chennai, India
- Thanked: 83 times
- Followed by:5 members
Is this always true ???theCodeToGMAT wrote:I doubt.. "caused" should have been rather "causing". As per the rule, verb+ed form should go the nearest object; if that's the case, then the meaning is changed. Maybe, there is some typo??Uva@90 wrote:Does they test the Idiom '....Not only....but also...' ?
Regards,
Uva.
Known is a drop Unknown is an Ocean
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
Yes, I have come across this "VERB+ED after comma" on several forums.Uva@90 wrote:Is this always true ???theCodeToGMAT wrote:I doubt.. "caused" should have been rather "causing". As per the rule, verb+ed form should go the nearest object; if that's the case, then the meaning is changed. Maybe, there is some typo??Uva@90 wrote:Does they test the Idiom '....Not only....but also...' ?
Regards,
Uva.
But, I am not sure about this posted question.. I am still not convinced with the Question.
R A H U L
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 45
- Joined: Wed May 14, 2014 11:26 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Rahul I deeply regret the typo! I had to keep doing an alt + tab while typing. You are correct. Choice C should be read as causing and not caused. I have corrected the option above! Regret the trouble mate!
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Yes, I have come across this "VERB+ED after comma" on several forums.Uva@90 wrote:Is this always true ???theCodeToGMAT wrote:I doubt.. "caused" should have been rather "causing". As per the rule, verb+ed form should go the nearest object; if that's the case, then the meaning is changed. Maybe, there is some typo??Uva@90 wrote:Does they test the Idiom '....Not only....but also...' ?
Regards,
Uva.
But, I am not sure about this posted question.. I am still not convinced with the Question.
- theCodeToGMAT
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1556
- Joined: Tue Aug 14, 2012 11:18 pm
- Thanked: 448 times
- Followed by:34 members
- GMAT Score:650
That's Ok Mate!
Joseph_Alexander wrote:Rahul I deeply regret the typo! I had to keep doing an alt + tab while typing. You are correct. Choice C should be read as causing and not caused. I have corrected the option above! Regret the trouble mate!
theCodeToGMAT wrote:Yes, I have come across this "VERB+ED after comma" on several forums.Uva@90 wrote:Is this always true ???theCodeToGMAT wrote:I doubt.. "caused" should have been rather "causing". As per the rule, verb+ed form should go the nearest object; if that's the case, then the meaning is changed. Maybe, there is some typo??Uva@90 wrote:Does they test the Idiom '....Not only....but also...' ?
Regards,
Uva.
But, I am not sure about this posted question.. I am still not convinced with the Question.
R A H U L
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 4
- Joined: Fri Aug 01, 2014 6:42 pm
- tanvis1120
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 95
- Joined: Sat Dec 28, 2013 8:53 am
- Location: United States
- Thanked: 2 times
- Followed by:5 members
C is the correct option.Joseph_Alexander wrote:Hi,
Kindly help me understand this question!
The rain has flooded drainage canals in many orange-tree groves, which has caused the fruit to fall before it will ripen and also threatened to kill the trees.
a) which has caused the fruit to fall before it will ripen and also threatened to kill
b) which not only caused the fruit to fall without ripening, but also threatened killing
c) not only causing the fruit to fall before ripening, but also threatening to kill
d) causing the fruit to fall before it will ripen, which will threaten killing
e) causing the fruit to have fallen before it ripened, which threatened to kill
It introduces the only..but also idiom which I first considered unnecessary. But this option "not only" uses the idiom correctly, "but also" corrects the verb tense which is wrong in all other options. Also, answers containing "which" should be totally eliminated at first.
Well, also this is a good example where elimination of wrong answers is well utilized!
@Experts: Let me know if my concept needs correction.
Thanks
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 37
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2014 10:40 am
- Thanked: 1 times
Im no expert but i can give this a shot
We can use "-ing" participle phrases to show a direct consequence of the main sentence.
the "comma + ing" modifier should only be used when:
(A)
it MODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause;
AND
(B)
one of the following is true:
(1) the "ing" action is SIMULTANEOUS with, and SUBORDINATE to, the main action;
- i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly
(2) the "ing" action is a DIRECT AND IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE of the main action.
- i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91
Now the second phrase"causing" is a direct consequence of the action of the verb of the main clause "flooding"
A and B are out since they suggest the grooves cause the flooding
D and E are out since "which" is used incorrectly
C is correct because it correctly parallels the flooding and threatening which are the direct consequences of flooding
We can use "-ing" participle phrases to show a direct consequence of the main sentence.
the "comma + ing" modifier should only be used when:
(A)
it MODIFIES THE ENTIRE ACTION of the preceding clause, and it APPLIES TO THE SUBJECT of that clause;
AND
(B)
one of the following is true:
(1) the "ing" action is SIMULTANEOUS with, and SUBORDINATE to, the main action;
- i ran down the sidewalk, flapping my arms wildly
(2) the "ing" action is a DIRECT AND IMMEDIATE CONSEQUENCE of the main action.
- i got a 100 on the most recent exam, bringing my average up to 91
Now the second phrase"causing" is a direct consequence of the action of the verb of the main clause "flooding"
A and B are out since they suggest the grooves cause the flooding
D and E are out since "which" is used incorrectly
C is correct because it correctly parallels the flooding and threatening which are the direct consequences of flooding
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 11
- Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 8:08 am
- Thanked: 1 times