Last week local shrimpers held

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

Last week local shrimpers held

by abhasjha » Sun May 18, 2014 6:52 am
Last week local shrimpers held a news conference to take some credit for the resurgence of the rare Kemp's ridley turtle, saying that their compliance with laws requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect adult sea turtles.

A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting

Legendary Member
Posts: 774
Joined: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:32 am
Thanked: 46 times
Followed by:14 members

by aditya8062 » Sun May 18, 2014 8:39 am
B seems best .following is wrong
A. requiring that turtle-excluder devices be on shrimp nets protect--->subject verb disagreement
B. requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting--->correct
C. that require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets protect---->subject verb disagreement
D. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets are protecting--->subject verb disagreement
E. to require turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting----->"laws to require" not correct when we are actually describing the "laws"

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
Elite Legendary Member
Posts: 10392
Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Thanked: 2867 times
Followed by:511 members
GMAT Score:800

by [email protected] » Sun May 18, 2014 2:27 pm
Hi abhasjha,

While this SC involves some rarer style issues, it does involve a common grammar rule:

1) Subject-verb agreement: The sentences states "...their COMPLIANCE with laws....."; the subject is "compliance." Looking at the verbs at the end of the 5 answer choices, we have the following options: "protect", "is protecting" and "are protecting." "Compliance....is protecting..." is grammatically correct. Eliminate A, C and D.

2) More Subject-verb agreement: The sentence also states "....laws...." Here were have a choice between "requiring" and "to require." Since a law is essentially "timeless" - it existed in the past, it exists now and it will probably exist tomorrow, we need to use an "-ing" verb. Eliminate E.

Final Answer: B

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Contact Rich at [email protected]
Image

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 379
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 7:17 am
Location: NY
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:11 members

GMAT/MBA Expert

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 645
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
Location: US
Thanked: 527 times
Followed by:227 members

by e-GMAT » Tue May 20, 2014 12:35 pm
Hi Abhasjha,

This is an an interesting question. I will present my reasoning from an alternate angle - the meaning approach

Please consider the following portion of the sentence that choice B forms:

...laws requiring turtle-excluder devices on shrimp nets is protecting adult sea turtles.

If you notice the correct choice B rightly conveys the intended meaning of the author by using the verb -ing modifier (requiring) to describe the mentioned laws. Here, the author wants to tell us what these laws are all about. These laws are regarding the use of certain devices and they require that such devices be on the shrimp-nets. The verb -ing modifier when used next to a noun without a comma gives us information about the preceding noun. Accordingly the verb -ing modifier requiring modifies the noun laws in the above portion.

This meaning is not conveyed when we use the "to require construction". The purpose of the "to + verb"
construction is to show the intention of something
; for example-

"¢ In our college, we have rules to ensure that the students turn up on time for their classes.

In the above sentence, the "to ensure" bit tells us about purpose of the rules and does not describe the rules per se. Now if we were to describe what these rules are actually about, we could say:

The rules requiring that students be in class within 5 minutes of the commencement of the session help in ensuring that the students turn up on time for their classes.

As you can see, in the above sentence we use the verb -ing modifier requiring to describe what the rules are actually about.

When we apply the above understanding to the question at hand, we can see that choices D and E fail to describe the laws. (Choices A and C on the other hand have subject-verb must agree in number issue.)

Hence, choice B is a clear winner in this question. It rightly conveys the intended meaning of the author. It tells us about a conference that was organized by the shrimpers of a particular area. Their purpose behind holding the conference was to let people know how they had contributed to the revival of a rare species of turtle, known as Kemp's ridley turtle. We also get to know the basis for the claim made by the shrimpers. As per them, their abiding by certain laws protects adult sea-turtles. Finally, we are also told what these laws are all about.

To solidify your understanding of the various usages of the verb -ing modifiers, please visit our in depth article.

Also, please refer to this article to understand how GMAT uses "to + verb" construction:

Hope the above discussion helps! :)

Regards,
Neeti