can anyone suggest the most efficient way of doing this problem? OR, more importantly, GMAT arithmetic in general.. any resources I can use to get better at it?
Which of the following expressions has the greatest value?
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 − (1/2)^4
C) 300/650
D) 3*(3/19)
E) sqrt(0.17)
Please let me know if anyone knows additional general techniques for gmat arithmetic. Books don't seem to have any useful tactics.
arithmetic problem
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 103
- Joined: Sat Jun 02, 2012 9:46 pm
- Thanked: 1 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:01 pm
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:2 members
LCM will be tedious I believe so approximation can work.
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 - (1/2)^4 = 7/16 = 7 * 6% = .42(approx)
C) 300/650 = 6/13 = 6 * 7% = .42(approx)
D) 3*(3/19) = 9/19 = 9 * 5% = .45(approx)
E) sqrt(0.17) -- closer to 0.4
So, now its down to A or D. From here its better to actually calculate the expression 9/19 to three decimal places and it is 0.473.
Answer D.
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 - (1/2)^4 = 7/16 = 7 * 6% = .42(approx)
C) 300/650 = 6/13 = 6 * 7% = .42(approx)
D) 3*(3/19) = 9/19 = 9 * 5% = .45(approx)
E) sqrt(0.17) -- closer to 0.4
So, now its down to A or D. From here its better to actually calculate the expression 9/19 to three decimal places and it is 0.473.
Answer D.
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 131
- Joined: Wed Nov 14, 2012 2:01 pm
- Thanked: 39 times
- Followed by:2 members
Alternately we can solve this by:-
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 - (1/2)^4 = 7/16 = 40% of 16(6.4) + less than 5% of 16(0.8) = < 0.45(approx)
C) 300/650 = 6/13 = 40% of 13(5.2) + little more than 6% of 13(0.78) = > 0.46(approx)
D) 3*(3/19) = 9/19 = 40% of 19(7.6) + little more than 7% of 19(1.33) = > 0.47(approx)
E) sqrt(0.17) -- closer to 0.4
Answer D.
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 - (1/2)^4 = 7/16 = 40% of 16(6.4) + less than 5% of 16(0.8) = < 0.45(approx)
C) 300/650 = 6/13 = 40% of 13(5.2) + little more than 6% of 13(0.78) = > 0.46(approx)
D) 3*(3/19) = 9/19 = 40% of 19(7.6) + little more than 7% of 19(1.33) = > 0.47(approx)
E) sqrt(0.17) -- closer to 0.4
Answer D.
Thanks Puneet for the solutions but I'm still a bit confused
This type (approximation) has been a weakness.
I did get [spoiler](D)[/spoiler] but I'm not sure if it was the right approach
Experts please help
This type (approximation) has been a weakness.
I did get [spoiler](D)[/spoiler] but I'm not sure if it was the right approach
Experts please help
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 56
- Joined: Mon Sep 17, 2012 12:27 pm
- Thanked: 13 times
- Followed by:1 members
- GMAT Score:710
1. 0.456 (leave it as it is)
2. 1/2 - 1/2^4 = 1/2 (1-1/8) = 1/2*7/8 = 1/2 * 0.875 = 0.43... (We know 7/8 = 0.875) and since 2nd decimal is 3, no need to calculate the 3rd decimal. At most it would be 0.44 if the 3rd decimal is >5
3. 300 / 650 = 6/13 (leave it as it is for now)
4. 9 / 19
Now, since I am not sure between 6/13 and 9/19 which one is greater, cross multiply
6*19 = 114
9*13 = 117
=> 9/19 is greater between the 2, keep it (so till now, we have eliminated 2 and 3, leave 9/19 as it is for now)
5. sqrt (0.17) = very close to 0.4 (something like 0.41 or 0.43 at the most, so eliminate)
Now, all we are left with are 1 and 4. Since the numbers are too close, I found 9/19 to be 0.47... (no need to calculate the 3rd decimal now since 7 > 6, if we round answers 1 and 3)
Thus, D is the answer.
Note: Need to be comfortable with ratios 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, 1/7, 1/8 and 1/9 and their multiples so we can quickly switch between ratios and decimals
Hope this helps.
2. 1/2 - 1/2^4 = 1/2 (1-1/8) = 1/2*7/8 = 1/2 * 0.875 = 0.43... (We know 7/8 = 0.875) and since 2nd decimal is 3, no need to calculate the 3rd decimal. At most it would be 0.44 if the 3rd decimal is >5
3. 300 / 650 = 6/13 (leave it as it is for now)
4. 9 / 19
Now, since I am not sure between 6/13 and 9/19 which one is greater, cross multiply
6*19 = 114
9*13 = 117
=> 9/19 is greater between the 2, keep it (so till now, we have eliminated 2 and 3, leave 9/19 as it is for now)
5. sqrt (0.17) = very close to 0.4 (something like 0.41 or 0.43 at the most, so eliminate)
Now, all we are left with are 1 and 4. Since the numbers are too close, I found 9/19 to be 0.47... (no need to calculate the 3rd decimal now since 7 > 6, if we round answers 1 and 3)
Thus, D is the answer.
Note: Need to be comfortable with ratios 1/2, 1/3, 1/4, 1/5, 1/6, 1/7, 1/8 and 1/9 and their multiples so we can quickly switch between ratios and decimals
Hope this helps.
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
One way to compare A, B, C and D is suggested by answer choice B: calculate the difference between each answer choice and 1/2.topspin360 wrote:can anyone suggest the most efficient way of doing this problem? OR, more importantly, GMAT arithmetic in general.. any resources I can use to get better at it?
Which of the following expressions has the greatest value?
A) 0.456
B) 1/2 − (1/2)^4
C) 300/650
D) 3*(3/19)
E) sqrt(0.17)
A: .5 - .456 = .044 = 44/1000 = 11/250 ≈ 1/22.
B: 1/2 - (1/2 − (1/2)�) = 1/2 - 1/2 + 1/16 = 1/16.
C: 1/2 - 300/650 = 325/650 - 300/650 = 25/650 = 1/26.
D: 1/2 - 3(3/19) = 1/2 - 9/19 = 19/38 - 18/38 = 1/38.
Since D yields the smallest difference, D is the CLOSEST TO 1/2.
Eliminate A, B and C.
To compare D and E, SQUARE them and put them over a COMMON DENOMINATOR:
D: (9/19)² = 81/361 ≈ 81/360 = 9/40 = 45/200.
E: (√.17)² = 17/100 = 34/200.
Since 45/200 > 34/200, eliminate E.
The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 85
- Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 7:15 am
- Thanked: 1 times
What is the concept behind this :
"
Now, since I am not sure between 6/13 and 9/19 which one is greater, cross multiply
6*19 = 114
9*13 = 117
=> 9/19 is greater between the 2, keep it (so till now, we have eliminated 2 and 3, leave 9/19 as it is for now) "
"
Now, since I am not sure between 6/13 and 9/19 which one is greater, cross multiply
6*19 = 114
9*13 = 117
=> 9/19 is greater between the 2, keep it (so till now, we have eliminated 2 and 3, leave 9/19 as it is for now) "
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
Another safe way is to perform a series of comparisons, starting with the easiest two values. Before we do so, however, let's simplify each answer:
A) 456/1000 = 57/125 (divide both the top and the bottom by 8)
B) 1/2 - 1/16 = 7/16
C) 300/650 = 6/13 (divide both the top and the bottom by 50)
D) 9/19
E) √(17/100) = √17/10
A and C seem relatively easy to compare. To compare these, we can follow a simple process. Assume 6/13 > 9/19, then cross-multiply. If the inequality you get is true, then 6/13 was bigger than 9/19. If the inequality you get is false, then it wasn't.
6/13 > 9/19 implies 6*19 > 9*13 or 114 > 117. Whoops! So 9/19 > 6/13. Eliminate C.
Now compare D to A. Assume 9/19 > 57/125. This implies 9*125 > 19*57, or 3*125 > 19*19, or 375 > 361. This is true, so D is still the biggest.
Now compare D to B. 9/19 > 7/16 implies 9*16 > 7*19 implies 144 > 133, which is true. So D is still the biggest.
Last we have D vs E. 9/19 > √17/10 implies 9*10 > 19*√17 or 90 > appx 19*4.25, which is true, so D is the biggest.
This problem is going to take time no matter how you approach it: the answer choices aren't very well designed and don't reward your ingenuity. On the GMAT, there would likely be one difficult insight that made the greatest value immediately clear rather than a series of unwieldy numbers designed to measure how quickly and accurately you can do arithmetic. (Perhaps something that seems scary at first but yields to a surprisingly simple approach, such as "Which of these is bigger, 2^√3 or 3^√2?")
A) 456/1000 = 57/125 (divide both the top and the bottom by 8)
B) 1/2 - 1/16 = 7/16
C) 300/650 = 6/13 (divide both the top and the bottom by 50)
D) 9/19
E) √(17/100) = √17/10
A and C seem relatively easy to compare. To compare these, we can follow a simple process. Assume 6/13 > 9/19, then cross-multiply. If the inequality you get is true, then 6/13 was bigger than 9/19. If the inequality you get is false, then it wasn't.
6/13 > 9/19 implies 6*19 > 9*13 or 114 > 117. Whoops! So 9/19 > 6/13. Eliminate C.
Now compare D to A. Assume 9/19 > 57/125. This implies 9*125 > 19*57, or 3*125 > 19*19, or 375 > 361. This is true, so D is still the biggest.
Now compare D to B. 9/19 > 7/16 implies 9*16 > 7*19 implies 144 > 133, which is true. So D is still the biggest.
Last we have D vs E. 9/19 > √17/10 implies 9*10 > 19*√17 or 90 > appx 19*4.25, which is true, so D is the biggest.
This problem is going to take time no matter how you approach it: the answer choices aren't very well designed and don't reward your ingenuity. On the GMAT, there would likely be one difficult insight that made the greatest value immediately clear rather than a series of unwieldy numbers designed to measure how quickly and accurately you can do arithmetic. (Perhaps something that seems scary at first but yields to a surprisingly simple approach, such as "Which of these is bigger, 2^√3 or 3^√2?")