Jason's salary and Karen's salary were both p percent greater in 1998 than 1995. What is value of p?
1)In 1999 Karen's salary was $2000 greater than Jason's
2) In 1995 Karen's salary was $24440 greater than Jason's
Not sure if we are assuming p percent as same increase for both of them?
Thanks
salary
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 9:06 pm
GMAT/MBA Expert
- [email protected]
- Elite Legendary Member
- Posts: 10392
- Joined: Sun Jun 23, 2013 6:38 pm
- Location: Palo Alto, CA
- Thanked: 2867 times
- Followed by:511 members
- GMAT Score:800
Hi parulmahajan89,
Did you transcribe this question correctly?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
Did you transcribe this question correctly?
GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
The problem should read as follows:
To illustrate:
Case 1: Karen's 1995 salary = 150, Jason's 1995 salary = 100, p=10%.
Difference in 1995: 150-100 = 50.
Karen's 1998 salary = 150 + .1(150) = 165.
Jason's 1998 salary = 100 + .1(100) = 110.
Difference in 1998 = 165-110 = 55.
The difference increases from 50 to 55 -- an increase of p=10%.
Case 2: Karen's 1995 salary = 200, Jason's 1995 salary = 100, p=20%.
Difference in 1995: 200-100 = 100.
Karen's 1998 salary = 200 + .2(200) = 240.
Jason's 1998 salary = 100 + .2(100) = 120.
Difference in 1998 = 240-120 = 120.
The difference increases from 100 to 120 -- an increase of p=20%.
Clearly, neither statement alone is sufficient.
When the two statements are combined, the difference between the salaries increases from 2000 to 2400 -- an increase of 20%.
Thus, p=20.
The correct answer is C.
Algebraic approach:
To make the math easier, let F be the FACTOR by which each salary increases.
Statement 1:
K-J = 2000.
No information about F.
Statement 2:
K's salary = (F)(K).
J's salary = (F)(J).
Since the difference between the two salaries is $2400, we get:
(F)(K) - (F)(K) = 2400.
F(K-J) = 2400.
No way to solve for F.
Statements combined:
Substituting K-J=2000 into F(K-j) = 2400, we get:
F(2000) = 2400
F = 2440/2000 = 240/200 = 120/100 = 120%.
Since each salary increases by a factor of 120%, the value of p -- the percent increase from 1995 to 1998 -- is 20%.
SUFFICIENT.
Since Jason's salary grew by p%, and Karen's salary grew by p%, the DIFFERENCE between their salaries also grew by p%.Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?
a) In 1995, Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's
b) In 1998, Karen's salary was $2,400 greater than Jason's
To illustrate:
Case 1: Karen's 1995 salary = 150, Jason's 1995 salary = 100, p=10%.
Difference in 1995: 150-100 = 50.
Karen's 1998 salary = 150 + .1(150) = 165.
Jason's 1998 salary = 100 + .1(100) = 110.
Difference in 1998 = 165-110 = 55.
The difference increases from 50 to 55 -- an increase of p=10%.
Case 2: Karen's 1995 salary = 200, Jason's 1995 salary = 100, p=20%.
Difference in 1995: 200-100 = 100.
Karen's 1998 salary = 200 + .2(200) = 240.
Jason's 1998 salary = 100 + .2(100) = 120.
Difference in 1998 = 240-120 = 120.
The difference increases from 100 to 120 -- an increase of p=20%.
Clearly, neither statement alone is sufficient.
When the two statements are combined, the difference between the salaries increases from 2000 to 2400 -- an increase of 20%.
Thus, p=20.
The correct answer is C.
Algebraic approach:
To make the math easier, let F be the FACTOR by which each salary increases.
Statement 1:
K-J = 2000.
No information about F.
Statement 2:
K's salary = (F)(K).
J's salary = (F)(J).
Since the difference between the two salaries is $2400, we get:
(F)(K) - (F)(K) = 2400.
F(K-J) = 2400.
No way to solve for F.
Statements combined:
Substituting K-J=2000 into F(K-j) = 2400, we get:
F(2000) = 2400
F = 2440/2000 = 240/200 = 120/100 = 120%.
Since each salary increases by a factor of 120%, the value of p -- the percent increase from 1995 to 1998 -- is 20%.
SUFFICIENT.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 74
- Joined: Fri May 11, 2012 9:06 pm
Is there any shortcut for this method? and May I know if this is a hard or medium level question?
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
Hi Parul,parulmahajan89 wrote:Is there any shortcut for this method? and May I know if this is a hard or medium level question?
Percent is same, but we cannot assume the increment same too, as that depends on the respective base salaries. Statement (2) is very impractical salary-wise. Further, this question is not copied correctly. I have seen this question before and answered [spoiler]C[/spoiler] without any math. In most of the occasions on DS, common sense saves all the hard work and time for us.
The correct question as suggested by Mitch is:
Jason's salary and Karen's salary were each p percent greater in 1998 than in 1995. What is the value of p?
a) In 1995, Karen's salary was $2,000 greater than Jason's.
b) In 1998, Karen's salary was $2,400 greater than Jason's.
Key fact here is that the difference in salaries would also increase by the same percent, and the two differences are given in the two statements, [spoiler]hence C, and this is a hard problem for the beginners[/spoiler].
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com