In the course of her researches, a historian recently found two documents mentioning the same person, Erich Schnitzler. One, dated May 3, 1739, is a record of Schnitzler's arrest for peddling without a license. The second, undated, is a statement by Schnitzler asserting that he has been peddling off and on for 20 years.
The facts above best support which of the following conclusions?
(A) Schnitzler started peddling around 1719.
(B) Schnitzler was arrested repeatedly for peddling.
(C) The undated document was written before 1765.
(D) The arrest record was written after the undated document.
(E) The arrest record provides better evidence that Schnitzler peddled than does the undated document.
q/a-c
5-Day Free Trial
5-day free, full-access trial TTP
Available with Beat the GMAT members only code
MORE DETAILS
conclusion
This topic has expert replies
-
Ankitaverma
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 72
- Joined: Tue Nov 05, 2013 4:35 pm
- Followed by:4 members
-
David@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
- Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1186 times
- Followed by:512 members
- GMAT Score:770
This exact question was posted twice on the same day!
Here is the other discussion of this topic where there are already two explanations posted. https://www.beatthegmat.com/arrested-for ... tml#703457
To be fair - this discussion was the first of the two to be posted. The other just happens to be the one where the discussion went.
Here is the other discussion of this topic where there are already two explanations posted. https://www.beatthegmat.com/arrested-for ... tml#703457
To be fair - this discussion was the first of the two to be posted. The other just happens to be the one where the discussion went.
