Question courtesy Manhattan GMAT CAT
Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1
OA to be posted lated
My question is [spoiler] when should we plug the values back in the absolute value equation to ensure the solution? I got this question wrong because I failed to plug the derived value of x back into the original equation and test them. Is it the case always or am I missing some information in the question? [/spoiler]
Thank you for the help
ABsolute Value Trap
This topic has expert replies
- jainpiyushjain
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:07 am
- Location: Bahrain
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:720
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
One option here is to solve each equation for x, but this isn't really necessary.jainpiyushjain wrote:Question courtesy Manhattan GMAT CAT
Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1
We know that |something| > 0
Target question: Is x > 0?
Statement 1: |x + 3| = 4x - 3
Since 4x - 3 equals |some expression|, we know that 4x - 3 > 0
Let's solve this inequality for x.
4x - 3 > 0
4x > 3
x > 3/4
If x > 3/4, then x > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: |x + 1| = 2x - 1
Since 2x - 1 equals |some expression|, we know that 2x - 1 > 0
Solve 2x - 1 > 0 for x
2x > 1
x > 1/2
If x > 1/2, then x > 0
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: D
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Always plug in the results (to ensure the solution does not have extraneous roots) when solving equations involving absolute value.jainpiyushjain wrote:
My question is when should we plug the values back in the absolute value equation to ensure the solution? I got this question wrong because I failed to plug the derived value of x back into the original equation and test them. Is it the case always or am I missing some information in the question?
Cheers,
Brent
- jainpiyushjain
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 44
- Joined: Sun Jun 13, 2010 3:07 am
- Location: Bahrain
- Thanked: 5 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:720
Noted & thank youBrent@GMATPrepNow wrote: Always plug in the results (to ensure the solution does not have extraneous roots) when solving equations involving absolute value.
Cheers,
Brent
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Here's the algebraic approach.jainpiyushjain wrote:Question courtesy Manhattan GMAT CAT
Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1
Target question: Is x > 0?
Statement 1: |x + 3| = 4x - 3
We'll use the following rule: If |A| = B then A = B or A = -B
Here, we get: We get:
x + 3 = 4x - 3 or x + 3 = -(4x - 3)
Solve each equation to get: x = 2 or x = 0
IMPORTANT: Plug in both solutions to confirm that there are no extraneous roots.
x = 2
|x + 3| = 4x - 3
|2 + 3| = 4(2) - 3
5 = 5
Perfect, x = 2 is a solution
x = 0
|x + 3| = 4x - 3
|0 + 3| = 4(0) - 3
3 = -3
No good. So x = 0 is an extraneous solution.
Since we now know that x = 2, we can be certain that x > 0
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: |x + 1| = 2x - 1
x + 1 = 2x - 1 or x + 1 = -(2x - 1)
Solve each equation to get: x = 2 or x = 0
Once again, when we plug the two values into the equation, we see that x = 0 is an extraneous root and that x = 2 works.
Since we now know that x = 2, we can be certain that x > 0
So, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: D
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Sat Dec 01, 2012 9:37 am
- Thanked: 6 times
Statement 1:jainpiyushjain wrote:Question courtesy Manhattan GMAT CAT
Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1
OA to be posted lated
My question is [spoiler] when should we plug the values back in the absolute value equation to ensure the solution? I got this question wrong because I failed to plug the derived value of x back into the original equation and test them. Is it the case always or am I missing some information in the question? [/spoiler]
Thank you for the help
|x + 3| = 4x - 3
Since, |x + 3| >= 0 therefore, 4x - 3 >= 0 or x >= 3/4
Hence, x > 0
Similarly Statement 2:
|x + 1| = 2x - 1
Since, |x + 1| >= 0 therefore, 2x - 1 >= 0 or x >= 1/2
Hence, x > 0
From each statement alone, we can check if x > 0 therefore answer should be
Option D
I don't think that we need to put the derived value of x back into the original equation.
We simply need to calculate the value of x from each equation and check if the condition is satisfying.
Polish your skills till you achieve perfection.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anju@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
- Location: Delhi, India
- Thanked: 344 times
- Followed by:86 members
Although this problem does not require solving absolute value equations as pointed by Brent, I'm writing this post to answer your query.jainpiyushjain wrote:...when should we plug the values back in the absolute value equation to ensure the solution? I got this question wrong because I failed to plug the derived value of x back into the original equation and test them. Is it the case always or am I missing some information in the question?
You only have to plug the values back in the absolute value equation to ensure the solution only if you blindly follow algebraic approach.
But if you solve the absolute value problems algebraically using the definition of absolute values, i.e. the proper algebraic approach, you don't have plug back the result in the original equation.
For example, |x + 3| = 4x - 3
- Now, if x ≥ -3, |x + 3| = (x + 3) ---> (x + 3) = 4x - 3 ---> x = 2 --> This is fine with our initial assumption of x ≥ -3
And, if x < -3, |x + 3| = -(x + 3) ---> -(x + 3) = 4x - 3 ---> x = 0 --> A contradiction to our initial assumption of x < -3
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome
Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.
§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Quant Expert, Gurome
Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.
§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Anju - I did not understand this following equation/explanation that you stated for the algebraic route |x + 3| = 4x - 3 (question when (x+3) is positive)
Now, if x ≥ -3, |x + 3| = (x + 3)
Why should x be greater than or equal to 3 , it should be x greater than 3
this is because as i understand absolute values |x + 3| when it is positive case means (x+3)> 0 . This is because anything positive means > 0 . if it is = 0 that means it is a non negative (but not positive) value
So when we talk about absolute value do we always consider equal to or greater than zero or just plainly greater than zero?
Many thanks - appreciate the help - your answer will really help me understand this conceptually
Thanks
Subhakam
Now, if x ≥ -3, |x + 3| = (x + 3)
Why should x be greater than or equal to 3 , it should be x greater than 3
this is because as i understand absolute values |x + 3| when it is positive case means (x+3)> 0 . This is because anything positive means > 0 . if it is = 0 that means it is a non negative (but not positive) value
So when we talk about absolute value do we always consider equal to or greater than zero or just plainly greater than zero?
Many thanks - appreciate the help - your answer will really help me understand this conceptually
Thanks
Subhakam
Brent - another question for you. As you statedBrent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Here's the algebraic approach.jainpiyushjain wrote:Question courtesy Manhattan GMAT CAT
Is x > 0?
(1) |x + 3| = 4x - 3
(2) |x + 1| = 2x - 1
Target question: Is x > 0?
Statement 1: |x + 3| = 4x - 3
We'll use the following rule: If |A| = B then A = B or A = -B
Here, we get: We get:
x + 3 = 4x - 3 or x + 3 = -(4x - 3)
Solve each equation to get: x = 2 or x = 0
IMPORTANT: Plug in both solutions to confirm that there are no extraneous roots.
x = 2
|x + 3| = 4x - 3
|2 + 3| = 4(2) - 3
5 = 5
Perfect, x = 2 is a solution
x = 0
|x + 3| = 4x - 3
|0 + 3| = 4(0) - 3
3 = -3
No good. So x = 0 is an extraneous solution.
Since we now know that x = 2, we can be certain that x > 0
So, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: |x + 1| = 2x - 1
x + 1 = 2x - 1 or x + 1 = -(2x - 1)
Solve each equation to get: x = 2 or x = 0
Once again, when we plug the two values into the equation, we see that x = 0 is an extraneous root and that x = 2 works.
Since we now know that x = 2, we can be certain that x > 0
So, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer: D
Cheers,
Brent
If |A| = B then A = B or A = -B
What happens if |A| = |B|
Thanks
Subhakam
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Good question.subhakam wrote:
Brent - another question for you. As you stated
If |A| = B then A = B or A = -B
What happens if |A| = |B|
Thanks
Subhakam
If |A| = |B|, then A = B or A = -B
You can test it with some values for A and B to confirm it.
Cheers,
Brent