Biocontrol agents

This topic has expert replies
User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

Biocontrol agents

by gmat740 » Thu Aug 06, 2009 5:52 pm
More selective than most chemical
pesticides in that they ordinarily destroy
only unwanted species, biocontrol.
agents (such as insects, fungi, and
(5) viruses) eat, infect, or parasitize targeted
plant or animal pests. However,
biocontrol agents can negatively affect
nontarget species by, for example,
competing with them for resources: a
(10) biocontrol agent might reduce the benefits
conferred by a desirable animal
species by consuming a plant on which
the animal prefers to lay its eggs.
Another example of indirect negative.
(15) consequcnces occurred in England
when a virus introduced to control
rabbits reduced the amount of open
ground (because large rabbit populations
reduce the ground cover), in
(20) turn reducing underground ant nests
and triggering the extinction of a blue
butterfly that had depended on the
nests to shelter its offspring. The
paucity of known extinctions or disrup-
(25) tions resulting from indirect interactions
may reflect not the infrequency of such
mishaps but rather the failure to look
for or to detect them: most organisms
likely to be adversely affected by
(30) indirect interactions are of little or
no known commercial value and the
events linking a biocontrol agent with
an adverse effect are often unclear.
Moreover, determining the potential
(35) risks of biocontrol agents before they
are used is difficult, especially when a
nonnative agent is introduced, because,
unlike a chemical pesticide, a biocontrol
agent may adapt in unpredictable ways.
(40) so that it can feed on or otherwise harm
new hosts.


4
The passage suggests that the author would
be most likely to agree with which of the
following statements about the use of biocontrol
agents?
A. Biocontrol agent should be used only in cases
where chemical pesticides have proven
ineffective or overly dangerous.
B. Extinctions and disruptions resulting from
the use of biocontrol agents are likely to
have increasingly severe commercial
consequences.
C. The use of biocontrol agents does not
require regulation as stringent as that
required by the use of chemical
pesticides.
D. The use of biocontrol agents may evenfinally
supersede the use of chemical pesticides
in controlling unwanted species.
E. The risks of using native biocontrol agents
may be easier to predict than the risks of
using nonnative biocontrol agents.

OA-E I find OA out of scope. Nowhere in the passage risks of non-native biocontrol agents is discussed.

Legendary Member
Posts: 876
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 8:14 am
Thanked: 13 times

Re: Biocontrol agents

by ketkoag » Fri Aug 07, 2009 12:40 am
gmat740 wrote:More selective than most chemical
pesticides in that they ordinarily destroy
only unwanted species, biocontrol.
agents (such as insects, fungi, and
(5) viruses) eat, infect, or parasitize targeted
plant or animal pests. However,
biocontrol agents can negatively affect
nontarget species by, for example,
competing with them for resources: a
(10) biocontrol agent might reduce the benefits
conferred by a desirable animal
species by consuming a plant on which
the animal prefers to lay its eggs.
Another example of indirect negative.
(15) consequcnces occurred in England
when a virus introduced to control
rabbits reduced the amount of open
ground (because large rabbit populations
reduce the ground cover), in
(20) turn reducing underground ant nests
and triggering the extinction of a blue
butterfly that had depended on the
nests to shelter its offspring. The
paucity of known extinctions or disrup-
(25) tions resulting from indirect interactions
may reflect not the infrequency of such
mishaps but rather the failure to look
for or to detect them: most organisms
likely to be adversely affected by
(30) indirect interactions are of little or
no known commercial value and the
events linking a biocontrol agent with
an adverse effect are often unclear.
Moreover, determining the potential
(35) risks of biocontrol agents before they
are used is difficult, especially when a
nonnative agent is introduced, because,
unlike a chemical pesticide, a biocontrol
agent may adapt in unpredictable ways.

(40) so that it can feed on or otherwise harm
new hosts.


4
The passage suggests that the author would
be most likely to agree with which of the
following statements about the use of biocontrol
agents?
A. Biocontrol agent should be used only in cases
where chemical pesticides have proven
ineffective or overly dangerous.
B. Extinctions and disruptions resulting from
the use of biocontrol agents are likely to
have increasingly severe commercial
consequences.
C. The use of biocontrol agents does not
require regulation as stringent as that
required by the use of chemical
pesticides.
D. The use of biocontrol agents may evenfinally
supersede the use of chemical pesticides
in controlling unwanted species.
E. The risks of using native biocontrol agents
may be easier to predict than the risks of
using nonnative biocontrol agents.

OA-E I find OA out of scope. Nowhere in the passage risks of non-native biocontrol agents is discussed.
Karan, see the bold part..
E is the direct restatement of that.. hence correct..

User avatar
MBA Student
Posts: 1194
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 9:42 pm
Location: Paris, France
Thanked: 71 times
Followed by:17 members
GMAT Score:710

by gmat740 » Fri Aug 07, 2009 6:11 am
Ahh Silly karan!

Thanks a lot.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1404
Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:2 members

by tanviet » Thu Jan 21, 2010 5:38 am
D is wrong because just ONE WORD is wrong, "in controlling"> I think "in affecting" will make D correct

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Aug 19, 2012 2:52 am

by nasheen » Wed Jun 05, 2013 3:22 am
"Another example of indirect negative consequences occurred in England when a virus introduced to control rabbits reduced the amount of open ground (because large rabbit populations reduce the ground cover), "

can someone explain me with what above statement mean?

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Jun 05, 2013 8:01 am

by Ratnakar Chitturi » Thu Jun 13, 2013 9:58 am
"Another example of indirect negative consequences occurred in England when a virus introduced to control rabbits reduced the amount of open ground (because large rabbit populations reduce the ground cover), "

can someone explain me with what above statement mean?

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
These kinds of sentences are usually given to waste our time in the real EXAM. It is better to focus on the structure rather than content.