Is x > 3^10 ?
(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Is x > 3^10 ?
This topic has expert replies
- kevincanspain
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 613
- Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:17 am
- Location: madrid
- Thanked: 171 times
- Followed by:64 members
- GMAT Score:790
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 18
- Joined: Sun Jan 29, 2012 8:00 am
- Thanked: 3 times
1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
i.e. x > 3^4*(3^8-1).......(a)
if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 3^4 * 3^6.......(b)
By comparing the 2 inequalities a and b, I can infer that if
(3^8-1) > 3^6 then x > 3^10.
Simply by looking at the equation i can say that 3^8 is any day greater than 3^6 and subtracting 1 from 3^8 will not harm the result much. thus,
x > 3^4(3^8 - 1)
and hence x > 3^4 * 3^6
So statement 1 is sufficient.
2)x > 10^5
again, if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 9^5
10^5>9^5
so x > 10^5
then x > 9^5 as well.
So statement 2 is sufficient.
OA should be D
Cheers,
GG
i.e. x > 3^4*(3^8-1).......(a)
if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 3^4 * 3^6.......(b)
By comparing the 2 inequalities a and b, I can infer that if
(3^8-1) > 3^6 then x > 3^10.
Simply by looking at the equation i can say that 3^8 is any day greater than 3^6 and subtracting 1 from 3^8 will not harm the result much. thus,
x > 3^4(3^8 - 1)
and hence x > 3^4 * 3^6
So statement 1 is sufficient.
2)x > 10^5
again, if I look back at the question it states that
is x > 3^10
i.e. x > 9^5
10^5>9^5
so x > 10^5
then x > 9^5 as well.
So statement 2 is sufficient.
OA should be D
Cheers,
GG
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 423
- Joined: Fri Jun 11, 2010 7:59 am
- Location: Seattle, WA
- Thanked: 86 times
- Followed by:2 members
Is x > 3^10?
1. x > 3^12 - 3^4
x > 3^4 (3^8 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^4 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^2 + 1) * (3^2 - 1)
x > 3^4 * ~3^4 * ~3^2 * ~3^2
x > ~3^12
Sufficient
2. x > 10^5
3^2 = 9
(3^2)^5 or 3^10 = 9^5
10^5 is greater than 9^5
Sufficient
Ans D
1. x > 3^12 - 3^4
x > 3^4 (3^8 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^4 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^2 + 1) * (3^2 - 1)
x > 3^4 * ~3^4 * ~3^2 * ~3^2
x > ~3^12
Sufficient
2. x > 10^5
3^2 = 9
(3^2)^5 or 3^10 = 9^5
10^5 is greater than 9^5
Sufficient
Ans D
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Anju@Gurome
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 511
- Joined: Wed Aug 11, 2010 9:47 am
- Location: Delhi, India
- Thanked: 344 times
- Followed by:86 members
Although you've got the correct answer, I just want to add that those three lines marked in green are unnecessary time waste. When you can approximate (3^2 - 1) as 3^2, you can definitely approximate (3^8 - 1) as 3^8.srcc25anu wrote:1. x > 3^12 - 3^4
x > 3^4 (3^8 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^4 - 1)
x > 3^4 * (3^4 + 1) * (3^2 + 1) * (3^2 - 1)
x > 3^4 * ~3^4 * ~3^2 * ~3^2
x > ~3^12
So without doing unnecessary calculations, you can directly approximate (3^4)*(3^8 - 1) as (3^4)*(3^8) = 3^12
Hope that helps.
Anju Agarwal
Quant Expert, Gurome
Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.
§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
Quant Expert, Gurome
Backup Methods : General guide on plugging, estimation etc.
Wavy Curve Method : Solving complex inequalities in a matter of seconds.
§ GMAT with Gurome § Admissions with Gurome § Career Advising with Gurome §
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
Target question: Is x > 3^10 ?kevincanspain wrote:Is x > 3^10 ?
(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Statement 1: x > 3^12 - 3^4
We need to compare 3^12 - 3^4 with 3^10.
If 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, then we can be certain that x > 3^10
Here's the "number sense" approach.
First, let's ignore the 3^4 for a moment.
Notice that 3^12 is WAYYYY bigger than 3^10
In fact, since 3^12 = (3^2)(3^10), we can see that 3^12 is 9 TIMES the value of 3^10
As such, subtracting 3^4 from 3^12 is going to have little effect on 3^12.
In other words, we can be quite certain that 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, which means x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, in which case we can be certain that x > 3^10
For those who don't like the number sense approach, here's a quick proof.
First recognize that x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10
Now examine 3^12 - 3^10
3^12 - 3^10 = 3^10(3^2 - 1) = 3^10(8)
Since 3^10(8) > 3^10, we can write:
x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x > 10^5
Since 3^2 = 9 and 4^2 = 16, we can say that (3.something^2) = 10
Now replace 10 with (3.something^2)
We get: x > (3.something^2)^5
Simplify: x > (3.something)^10
Since (3.something)^10 > 3^10, we can write: x > (3.something)^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2012 5:27 am
- Followed by:1 members
I have simplified the Statement - 2 in the following way:
Given : x > 10^5
Question: Is x > 3^10? ( or x > 9^5)
Because 3^10 can be written as 9^5 as 3^10 = (3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3).
Now, if x > 10^5 then it is certain that x > 9^5. So SUFFICIENT.
Thanks.
Given : x > 10^5
Question: Is x > 3^10? ( or x > 9^5)
Because 3^10 can be written as 9^5 as 3^10 = (3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3)*(3*3).
Now, if x > 10^5 then it is certain that x > 9^5. So SUFFICIENT.
Thanks.
Brent@GMATPrepNow wrote:Target question: Is x > 3^10 ?kevincanspain wrote:Is x > 3^10 ?
(1) x > 3^12 - 3^4
(2) x > 10^5
Statement 1: x > 3^12 - 3^4
We need to compare 3^12 - 3^4 with 3^10.
If 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, then we can be certain that x > 3^10
Here's the "number sense" approach.
First, let's ignore the 3^4 for a moment.
Notice that 3^12 is WAYYYY bigger than 3^10
In fact, since 3^12 = (3^2)(3^10), we can see that 3^12 is 9 TIMES the value of 3^10
As such, subtracting 3^4 from 3^12 is going to have little effect on 3^12.
In other words, we can be quite certain that 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, which means x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^10, in which case we can be certain that x > 3^10
For those who don't like the number sense approach, here's a quick proof.
First recognize that x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10
Now examine 3^12 - 3^10
3^12 - 3^10 = 3^10(3^2 - 1) = 3^10(8)
Since 3^10(8) > 3^10, we can write:
x > 3^12 - 3^4 > 3^12 - 3^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT
Statement 2: x > 10^5
Since 3^2 = 9 and 4^2 = 16, we can say that (3.something^2) = 10
Now replace 10 with (3.something^2)
We get: x > (3.something^2)^5
Simplify: x > (3.something)^10
Since (3.something)^10 > 3^10, we can write: x > (3.something)^10 > 3^10
From here, we can be certain that x > 3^10
Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT
Answer = D
Cheers,
Brent
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Sat Mar 16, 2013 11:56 am
all of the calculations unnecessary in this case. each statement gives you a value of x- regardless of what that value is, it will allow you answer the original yes/no question. it doesn't matter whether it's yes or no, just that you can answer it given whatever the expressions in 1 and 2 simplify to.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Brent@GMATPrepNow
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 16207
- Joined: Mon Dec 08, 2008 6:26 pm
- Location: Vancouver, BC
- Thanked: 5254 times
- Followed by:1268 members
- GMAT Score:770
That would be true if each statement gave us the actual value of x. However, each statement is an inequality (not an equation) and does not give us the value of x.chrislacolla wrote:all of the calculations unnecessary in this case. each statement gives you a value of x- regardless of what that value is, it will allow you answer the original yes/no question. it doesn't matter whether it's yes or no, just that you can answer it given whatever the expressions in 1 and 2 simplify to.
For example, consider this question.
Is x > 10?
(1) x > 2
(2) x > 3
In this case the each statement does not sufficient.
Conversely, this question analogous to the original question.
Is x > 10?
(1) x > 12
(2) x > 13
Here, each statement is sufficient because each one ensures that x > 10.
So, the given inequalities need to be examined in greater detail than you suggest.
Cheers,
Brent