Hailed as a key discovery in the science of evolution, the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of a possible link in the evolutionary chain from water-based to land-based organisms.
the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of
a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provides fossils that are evidence
a large scaly creature, whose fossils resemble both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature, which resembles both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature resemble both a fish and a land-animal and provide evidence of
Nice one : Hailed as a key discovery
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 784
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 3:51 am
- Thanked: 114 times
- Followed by:12 members
HAILED AS...EVOLUTION should modifiy FOSSILS not CREATURE. As per the meaning, Creature is not hailed as key discovery - its the FOSSILS. drop B/Chimu wrote:Hailed as a key discovery in the science of evolution, the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of a possible link in the evolutionary chain from water-based to land-based organisms.
the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of
a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provides fossils that are evidence
a large scaly creature, whose fossils resemble both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature, which resembles both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature resemble both a fish and a land-animal and provide evidence of
D - FOSSILS....PROVIDES (wrong sibject-verb)
E - RESEMBLE....AND PROVIDE use of two verbs suggest that RESEMBLING AND PROVIDING are two different activities, but as per the original sentence, FOSSILS THAT RESEMBLE FISH AND LAND ANIMAL PROVIDE EVIDENCE OF XXXX. Meaning, the discovers may have found many fossils, but they are interested in fossils that resemble fish and land animal. These fossils provide evidence of link.
IMO A
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Tommy Wallach
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 188 times
- Followed by:120 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hey Guys,
Great explanations here! I would only add that the issue with (C) is that it's not the large scaly creature that provides evidence of the link; it's the fossil. Technically, the opening modifier could modify the large scaly creature, if that large scaly creature were alive and in itself it provided the link in the evolutionary chain. But because we know this had to happen a long time ago, it has to be the fossils, not the creature. This makes the first part wrong as well, but it's worth looking at both pieces.
-t
Great explanations here! I would only add that the issue with (C) is that it's not the large scaly creature that provides evidence of the link; it's the fossil. Technically, the opening modifier could modify the large scaly creature, if that large scaly creature were alive and in itself it provided the link in the evolutionary chain. But because we know this had to happen a long time ago, it has to be the fossils, not the creature. This makes the first part wrong as well, but it's worth looking at both pieces.
-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Tommy Wallach
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 188 times
- Followed by:120 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hey Guys,
Great explanations here! I would only add that the issue with (C) is that it's not the large scaly creature that provides evidence of the link; it's the fossil. Technically, the opening modifier could modify the large scaly creature, if that large scaly creature were alive and in itself it provided the link in the evolutionary chain. But because we know this had to happen a long time ago, it has to be the fossils, not the creature. This makes the first part wrong as well, but it's worth looking at both pieces.
-t
Great explanations here! I would only add that the issue with (C) is that it's not the large scaly creature that provides evidence of the link; it's the fossil. Technically, the opening modifier could modify the large scaly creature, if that large scaly creature were alive and in itself it provided the link in the evolutionary chain. But because we know this had to happen a long time ago, it has to be the fossils, not the creature. This makes the first part wrong as well, but it's worth looking at both pieces.
-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
- himu
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 345
- Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2008 10:57 pm
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:3 members
Yes u r correct.
The OA is A
But can someone pls throw more light on why it should be the FOSSILS & no the CREATURE?
I mean I understand the meaning here...but the < large scaly creature> can also be discovered NOW since this has happened a long time ago as Tommy mentioned ?
The OA is A
But can someone pls throw more light on why it should be the FOSSILS & no the CREATURE?
I mean I understand the meaning here...but the < large scaly creature> can also be discovered NOW since this has happened a long time ago as Tommy mentioned ?
GMAT/MBA Expert
- Tommy Wallach
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 451
- Joined: Thu Jan 21, 2010 11:58 am
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 188 times
- Followed by:120 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hey Himu,
I think we can actually do this question without even worrying about that distinction.
(B) It doesn't provide fossils. That makes no sense.
(C) The fossils don't resemble a fish and a land-animal, the creature does (a fossil looks like a dirty rock!).
(D) SV Agreement.
(E) SV Agreement.
So even if you don't like the fossils/creature split, they still give you stuff to go on!
-t
I think we can actually do this question without even worrying about that distinction.
(A) Great.Hailed as a key discovery in the science of evolution, the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of a possible link in the evolutionary chain from water-based to land-based organisms.
the fossils of a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provide evidence of
a large scaly creature resembling both a fish and a land-animal provides fossils that are evidence
a large scaly creature, whose fossils resemble both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature, which resembles both a fish and a land-animal, provides evidence of
the fossils of a large scaly creature resemble both a fish and a land-animal and provide evidence of
(B) It doesn't provide fossils. That makes no sense.
(C) The fossils don't resemble a fish and a land-animal, the creature does (a fossil looks like a dirty rock!).
(D) SV Agreement.
(E) SV Agreement.
So even if you don't like the fossils/creature split, they still give you stuff to go on!
-t
Tommy Wallach, Company Expert
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!
ManhattanGMAT
If you found this posting mega-helpful, feel free to thank and/or follow me!