A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
A. it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make
B. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make
C. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make
D. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making
E. as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
What is wrong with D?
OA B
parallel construction SC
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Sun Sep 28, 2008 11:00 am
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 6 times
- Followed by:1 members
replace lenthy phases with X and Y and we get :
.... ability of some children to distinguish X and to make Y
(B)
.... ability of some children to distinguish X and to make Y
(B)
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 377
- Joined: Wed Sep 03, 2008 9:30 am
- Thanked: 15 times
- Followed by:2 members
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
- Location: toronto
- Thanked: 5 times
I know that 'A' is wrong because of the use of 'for' after 'ability' but I don't understand why 'the result is' is incorrect in 'A' and 'as a result' is correct in 'B'.schumi_gmat wrote:A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
A. it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make
B. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make
C. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make
D. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making
E. as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
What is wrong with D?
OA B
OE says, In 'A' "The phrase 'and, the result is' introduces a new clause which indicates that children's inability to distinguish sounds enables them to make sense of speech".
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 102
- Joined: Sun Mar 29, 2009 7:21 pm
- Location: toronto
- Thanked: 5 times
- Domnu
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 385
- Joined: Sun May 24, 2009 3:55 pm
- Thanked: 11 times
- GMAT Score:740
Sure; the reason is because a subordinate clause is needed, and in choice A, the phrase in question ends with a verb and attempts to complete the next part of the sentence.vaishalijain7 wrote:can anybody please clear my doubt?
Have you wondered how you could have found such a treasure? -T
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Can someone please help me in clearing the following doubts:Bidisha800 wrote:replace lenthy phases with X and Y and we get :
.... ability of some children to distinguish X and to make Y
(B)
Doubt#1
========
Can we split the infinitive "to" with ability....Manhattan gives the idiom usage as ability to....and almost all the questions that I have seen till now use the same ability to...together...
Infact Manhattan says Ability for X to do Y...
is a wrong usage....
Doubt#2
========
Doesn't GMAT like the idiom as
distinguish between A and B ?
i.e. should the usage be like:
to distinguish "between" discrete sounds and words
instead of : "to distinguish discrete sounds and words"
Manhattan 4th Edition clearly say on page#152 that distinguish X and Y is a wrong usage.....
- rahulg83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:710
B is perfectly parallelschumi_gmat wrote:A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
A. it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make
B. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, as a result, to make
C. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words and, the result of this, they are unable to make
D. that it hampers the ability of some children to distinguish discrete sounds and words, and results in not making
E. as to hamper the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words, resulting in being unable to make
What is wrong with D?
OA B
pace hampers the ability...to distinguish....to make...
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
yes it is parallel...
but isn't it breaking the idiom rules....
Please tell what I am missing here...
but isn't it breaking the idiom rules....
Please tell what I am missing here...
- rahulg83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:710
I think 'ability for' is incorrect, but 'ability of' X to do Y is correct. Regarding the second doubt, GMAT considers only distinguish between X and Y. But in this particular question, no choice uses this idiom. But i don't think to distinguish X and Y is ungrammatical at all. It's just that GMAT considers it incorrect.goelmohit2002 wrote:Can someone please help me in clearing the following doubts:Bidisha800 wrote:replace lenthy phases with X and Y and we get :
.... ability of some children to distinguish X and to make Y
(B)
Doubt#1
========
Can we split the infinitive "to" with ability....Manhattan gives the idiom usage as ability to....and almost all the questions that I have seen till now use the same ability to...together...
Infact Manhattan says Ability for X to do Y...
is a wrong usage....
Doubt#2
========
Doesn't GMAT like the idiom as
distinguish between A and B ?
i.e. should the usage be like:
to distinguish "between" discrete sounds and words
instead of : "to distinguish discrete sounds and words"
Manhattan 4th Edition clearly say on page#152 that distinguish X and Y is a wrong usage.....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1799
- Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
- Thanked: 36 times
- Followed by:2 members
Thanks Rahul. But as per Manhattan with Ability there is only one thing supported "to"rahulg83 wrote: I think 'ability for' is incorrect, but 'ability of' X to do Y is correct. Regarding the second doubt, GMAT considers only distinguish between X and Y. But in this particular question, no choice uses this idiom. But i don't think to distinguish X and Y is ungrammatical at all. It's just that GMAT considers it incorrect.
And with Distinguish only one i.e. Between...
Although the option that is the correct answer is best...
But I am really puzzled whether this infact is a acceptable usage in GMAT...and needs to be kept in Mind or we can simply forget about this question...thinking that since we in anyhow had to choose best amongst the worst and this type of idioms breaking thing will not happen in real GMAT.
- rahulg83
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:4 members
- GMAT Score:710
exactly as you said. I don't think any unidiomatic usage as per GMAT will appear on the real test. GMAC people don't want themselves to be put into some controversy
Is distinguish x and y a correct idiom? can anyone please reply why option A is correct eventhough it seems to be idimatically incorrect....goelmohit2002 wrote:Thanks Rahul. But as per Manhattan with Ability there is only one thing supported "to"rahulg83 wrote: I think 'ability for' is incorrect, but 'ability of' X to do Y is correct. Regarding the second doubt, GMAT considers only distinguish between X and Y. But in this particular question, no choice uses this idiom. But i don't think to distinguish X and Y is ungrammatical at all. It's just that GMAT considers it incorrect.
And with Distinguish only one i.e. Between...
Although the option that is the correct answer is best...
But I am really puzzled whether this infact is a acceptable usage in GMAT...and needs to be kept in Mind or we can simply forget about this question...thinking that since we in anyhow had to choose best amongst the worst and this type of idioms breaking thing will not happen in real GMAT.
GMAT/MBA Expert
- e-GMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 645
- Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 12:42 pm
- Location: US
- Thanked: 527 times
- Followed by:227 members
Hi Onell,
If the word distinguish is used to compare two entities, i.e. point out differences between two entities, then the correct idiom is distinguish between x and y.
Colorblind people are not able to distinguish between green objects and red objects when these objects are placed in a pattern.
However, note the use of "distinguish" in the following sentence:
Excessively colorblind people cannot distinguish colors at all.
In this sentence, distinguish implies "manage to discern". (you may also check the following link from Oxford:https://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entr ... _us1241048)
Now how does one tell if its one or the other: From the context of the sentence.
Lets read the sentence:
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
The author is stating that certain activity (brisk conversational pace of life) hampers ability of children to distinguish discrete sounds and words. Now pay close attention to what the children are not able to distinguish -
DISCRETE SOUNDS - thus they are unable to tell one sounds from another. e.g. distinguish between the sounds of 't' and 'd'
WORDS - thus they are unable to tell one word from another. - e.g. distinguish between the words dad and that.
Author does not intend on saying that children cannot distinguish between discrete sounds and words. The author does not state a comparison here.
To summarize, understand the intended meaning of the sentence. Whenever distinguish is used for comparison between two entities, distinguish between x and y is the correct usage. Whenever it is used to state the meaning "to discern", use it as a stand alone word. Once again, understand what the author of the sentence is trying to communicate.
Thanks,
Payal
If the word distinguish is used to compare two entities, i.e. point out differences between two entities, then the correct idiom is distinguish between x and y.
Colorblind people are not able to distinguish between green objects and red objects when these objects are placed in a pattern.
However, note the use of "distinguish" in the following sentence:
Excessively colorblind people cannot distinguish colors at all.
In this sentence, distinguish implies "manage to discern". (you may also check the following link from Oxford:https://oxforddictionaries.com/view/entr ... _us1241048)
Now how does one tell if its one or the other: From the context of the sentence.
Lets read the sentence:
A new study suggests that the conversational pace of everyday life may be so brisk it hampers the ability of some children for distinguishing discrete sounds and words and, the result is, to make sense of speech.
The author is stating that certain activity (brisk conversational pace of life) hampers ability of children to distinguish discrete sounds and words. Now pay close attention to what the children are not able to distinguish -
DISCRETE SOUNDS - thus they are unable to tell one sounds from another. e.g. distinguish between the sounds of 't' and 'd'
WORDS - thus they are unable to tell one word from another. - e.g. distinguish between the words dad and that.
Author does not intend on saying that children cannot distinguish between discrete sounds and words. The author does not state a comparison here.
To summarize, understand the intended meaning of the sentence. Whenever distinguish is used for comparison between two entities, distinguish between x and y is the correct usage. Whenever it is used to state the meaning "to discern", use it as a stand alone word. Once again, understand what the author of the sentence is trying to communicate.
Thanks,
Payal
Register for free live sessions
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
Sentence Correction: Get 4 free video lessons, 50 practice questions
Critical Reasoning workshop: Get 4 free video lessons, 40 practice questions
Reading Comprehension: Get 2 free video lessons and 2 free eBooks
Free Strategy Session: Key strategy to score 760
Success Stories
V27 to V42 | V28 to V48 | V25 to V38 | More Success Stories
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 15
- Joined: Mon Oct 25, 2010 2:34 am
- Followed by:1 members