1. They wanted
me to include
references, but I didn't want to list
my previous landlord because I
Had had some
problems with him in the past and I
knew he wouldn't recommend me.
2. They wanted
me to include
references, but I didn't want to list
my previous landlord because I
Had some
problems with him in the past and I
knew he wouldn't recommend me.
Hello. Which one of them is correct and why? I know we use "had" when we are refering to some event that happened before some other event that is already under discussion, but still use of "had" looks more appropriate. I think this rule does not apply. Your take? Thanks.
Had vs had had
This topic has expert replies
- towerSpider
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:02 am
- Thanked: 3 times
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:58 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:750
Hi towerSpider,1. They wanted me to include references, but I didn't want to list my previous landlord because I had had some problems with him in the past and I knew he wouldn't recommend me.
The correct tense here is "had had," as it describes an event that happened BEFORE another event that is in the past.
You are right that "had" sounds OK too, and it COULD have been correct if the phrase "in the past" hadn't been there. If you instead said "because I had some problems with him and I knew..." then those problems would be understood to have been occurring at the same time as or still be ongoing when "they wanted me to include references."
Since the problems did NOT occur at the same time as the request for references, but they actually occurred "in the past" relative to that point in time, i.e. BEFORE the request for references, the past perfect ("had had") is the way to go.
Here's a time line:
--------past perfect--------------------------simple past-----------------------present------------------
------problems with landlord---------request for references----------telling about the issue-------
Go to www.superduperstudent.com for GMAT tutoring and MBA application support!
- towerSpider
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 155
- Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2010 11:02 am
- Thanked: 3 times
Thats the problem. In official version, only "had" is used.
People are not prisoners of fate, but prisoners of their own mind.
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 35
- Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2011 4:58 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:750
Hi TowerSpider,Thats the problem. In official version, only "had" is used.
I'm afraid I must have misunderstood your question then. I responded to
If you have a different question, I'm happy to address it!Which one of them is correct and why?
Go to www.superduperstudent.com for GMAT tutoring and MBA application support!
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 10
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 2:58 am
- Thanked: 1 times
- KapTeacherEli
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:00 pm
- Thanked: 136 times
- Followed by:62 members
Hi kapil,kapilhede17 wrote:Can some 1 please show me where HAD HAD is preferred over HAD ..
Thanks
"had had" is the past perfect of "to have," to we need a case where the past perfect is necessary. That means, we want "to have" something, but that action has to be the earlier of two past actions. So,
"My girlfriend made me pizza for dinner, but I had had pizza for lunch, so I didn't enjoy it. I feel terrible!"
Here, the speaker describes two actions. Both dinner and lunch are in the past, but the lunch is earlier in the past. So, the "had had" is correct--although "had eaten" or "had bought" might be less awkward!