Is it true that x > 0?
(i) x^2 = 2x
(2) x^3 = 3x
The answer is C. Can someone explain in detail please?
Thanks
Pugal
data sufficiency ?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
- Posts: 29
- Joined: Fri Sep 25, 2009 9:26 am
- eagleeye
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 520
- Joined: Sat Apr 28, 2012 9:12 pm
- Thanked: 339 times
- Followed by:49 members
- GMAT Score:770
Hi Pugal:
We are asked to find whether x > 0.
Let's look at the statements.
(i)
x^2 = 2x => x(x-2)=0. So either x=0 or x=2. If x=0, x is not greater than 0, if x=2, x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
(2)
x^3 = 3x => x(x^2-3)=0 => x=0 or x^2=3 => x=0 or x=-sqrt(3) or x=+sqrt(3). Since x can either be 0 or positive or negative, we can't know whether x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
Combining the two.
The only common value that satisfies both equations is x=0. Since x is equal to 0, x is not greater than 0. Sufficient.
Let me know if this helps
We are asked to find whether x > 0.
Let's look at the statements.
(i)
x^2 = 2x => x(x-2)=0. So either x=0 or x=2. If x=0, x is not greater than 0, if x=2, x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
(2)
x^3 = 3x => x(x^2-3)=0 => x=0 or x^2=3 => x=0 or x=-sqrt(3) or x=+sqrt(3). Since x can either be 0 or positive or negative, we can't know whether x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
Combining the two.
The only common value that satisfies both equations is x=0. Since x is equal to 0, x is not greater than 0. Sufficient.
Let me know if this helps
- KapTeacherEli
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 578
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 6:00 pm
- Thanked: 136 times
- Followed by:62 members
Great summary! This ia a good, thorough way to solve this. In particular, the key is spotting that 0 is a possible solution. The "trap" choice some test-takers may fall into is trying to simplify by dividing out x's. But unless you know a variable is non-zero, you can't divide by it!eagleeye wrote:Hi Pugal:
We are asked to find whether x > 0.
Let's look at the statements.
(i)
x^2 = 2x => x(x-2)=0. So either x=0 or x=2. If x=0, x is not greater than 0, if x=2, x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
(2)
x^3 = 3x => x(x^2-3)=0 => x=0 or x^2=3 => x=0 or x=-sqrt(3) or x=+sqrt(3). Since x can either be 0 or positive or negative, we can't know whether x is greater than 0. Insufficient.
Combining the two.
The only common value that satisfies both equations is x=0. Since x is equal to 0, x is not greater than 0. Sufficient.
Let me know if this helps
Interestingly, we could use that very trap to get to answer (C) by a roundabout method. If we assume x is non-zero and divide each side of statement 1) by x, we get x = 2, so x ^ 2 = 4. If we divide each side of statement 2) by x, we'll get x ^ 2 = 3. But it already equalled 4! Our assumption that x was non-zero led to a contradiction, and the two statements on in a DS problem will never contradict. Therefore, the only logical conclusion is that our assumption was wrong, x = 0, and the solution is (C).