Ten years ago, scientists predicted that the animal z would become extinct in t years. What is t?
(1) Animal z became extinct 4 years ago.
(2) If the scientists had extended their extinction prediction for animal z by 3 years, their prediction would have been incorrect by 2 years.
[spoiler]OA after some time![/spoiler]
Manhattan CAT extinction
This topic has expert replies
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 92
- Joined: Thu Oct 06, 2011 8:06 am
- Thanked: 18 times
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:10 am
- Thanked: 1 times
IMO: A
Statement 1: 10 yrs ago from now it was predicted and it extincted 4 yrs ago from now. It means 10-4 = 6 yrs
t=6 yrs SUFFECIENT
Statement 2: There is nothing given on specific time of prediction INSUFFECIENT
Statement 1: 10 yrs ago from now it was predicted and it extincted 4 yrs ago from now. It means 10-4 = 6 yrs
t=6 yrs SUFFECIENT
Statement 2: There is nothing given on specific time of prediction INSUFFECIENT
- neelgandham
- Community Manager
- Posts: 1060
- Joined: Fri May 13, 2011 6:46 am
- Location: Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Thanked: 318 times
- Followed by:52 members
Ten years ago, scientists predicted that the animal z would become extinct in t years. What is t?
Statement 1 is Insufficient to answer the question IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has gone wrong.
If the scientists have extended the prediction by 3 years(t+3 years), the prediction would be incorrect by 2 years i.e the actual extinction is after t+1((t+3)-2) or t+5((t+3)+2) years from the time of scientist's prediction.
So, t+1 = 6 or t+5 = 6 (From Statement 1)
t = 5 or t = 1
So, we don't have a single answer to the question.
Correct answer choice = A IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has come true.
Correct answer choice = E IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has gone wrong.
I am not sure if this question qualifies as a GMAT MATH question![/quote]
Statement 1 is sufficient to answer the question IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has come true. Then t = 10-4 = 6 years(1) Animal z became extinct 4 years ago.
Statement 1 is Insufficient to answer the question IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has gone wrong.
Since, there is no relation between the prediction and the actual time of extinction, Statement 2 is Insufficient to answer the question.(2) If the scientists had extended their extinction prediction for animal z by 3 years, their prediction would have been incorrect by 2 years.
(Let us assume that the prediction has gone wrong)Statement 1 + 2
If the scientists have extended the prediction by 3 years(t+3 years), the prediction would be incorrect by 2 years i.e the actual extinction is after t+1((t+3)-2) or t+5((t+3)+2) years from the time of scientist's prediction.
So, t+1 = 6 or t+5 = 6 (From Statement 1)
t = 5 or t = 1
So, we don't have a single answer to the question.
Correct answer choice = A IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has come true.
Correct answer choice = E IF ( and a BIG IF) the scientists prediction has gone wrong.
I am not sure if this question qualifies as a GMAT MATH question![/quote]
Anil Gandham
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
Welcome to BEATtheGMAT | Photography | Getting Started | BTG Community rules | MBA Watch
Check out GMAT Prep Now's online course at https://www.gmatprepnow.com/
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 114
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:10 am
- Thanked: 1 times
I agree with you, neelgandham
To remove the confusion the statement 1 should be written as "Animal z became extinct 4 years ago, this is wat was also predicted by scientists"
To remove the confusion the statement 1 should be written as "Animal z became extinct 4 years ago, this is wat was also predicted by scientists"
- Anaira Mitch
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 235
- Joined: Wed Oct 26, 2016 9:21 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- Followed by:5 members
The question does not ask for the actual number of years ago that animal z became extinct. Instead it asks for t, the number of years scientists predicted it would take for animal z to become extinct.
(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us that animal z became extinct 4 years ago but it does not provide information about t.
(2) INSUFFICIENT: This provides a relationship between the predicted time of extinction time and the actual time of extinction but does not provide any actual values for either.
(1) AND (2) INSUFFICIENT: The easiest way to approach this problem is to imagine a time line from 0 to 10. The scientists made their prediction 10 years ago, or at 0 years.
From statement (1) we know that animal z became extinct 4 years ago, or at 6 years.
From statement (2) we know that if the scientists had extended their prediction by 3 years they would have been incorrect by 2 years. The key to this question is to realize that "incorrect by 2 years" could mean 2 years in either direction: 6 + 2 = 8 years or 6 - 2 = 4 years.
From here, we can write two simple equations:
t + 3 = 8 OR t + 3 = 4
t = 5 t = 1
This gives us two different values for t, which means that (1) and (2) together are not sufficient to come up with one definitive value for t. The correct answer is E.
(1) INSUFFICIENT: This tells us that animal z became extinct 4 years ago but it does not provide information about t.
(2) INSUFFICIENT: This provides a relationship between the predicted time of extinction time and the actual time of extinction but does not provide any actual values for either.
(1) AND (2) INSUFFICIENT: The easiest way to approach this problem is to imagine a time line from 0 to 10. The scientists made their prediction 10 years ago, or at 0 years.
From statement (1) we know that animal z became extinct 4 years ago, or at 6 years.
From statement (2) we know that if the scientists had extended their prediction by 3 years they would have been incorrect by 2 years. The key to this question is to realize that "incorrect by 2 years" could mean 2 years in either direction: 6 + 2 = 8 years or 6 - 2 = 4 years.
From here, we can write two simple equations:
t + 3 = 8 OR t + 3 = 4
t = 5 t = 1
This gives us two different values for t, which means that (1) and (2) together are not sufficient to come up with one definitive value for t. The correct answer is E.
-
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2630
- Joined: Wed Sep 12, 2012 3:32 pm
- Location: East Bay all the way
- Thanked: 625 times
- Followed by:119 members
- GMAT Score:780
It's important to point out that the confusion here is DELIBERATE: the author of the question is testing whether you notice this distinction without it being made explicit.krishna239455 wrote:I agree with you, neelgandham
To remove the confusion the statement 1 should be written as "Animal z became extinct 4 years ago, this is wat was also predicted by scientists"