Clueless how I got a 750(Q-50,V-42)!

Find out how Beat The GMAT members tackled GMAT test prep with positive results. Get tips on GMAT test prep materials, online courses, study tips, and more.
This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

Clueless how I got a 750(Q-50,V-42)!

by Paulrichards » Thu Mar 17, 2011 7:58 am
Hey guys, took the GMAT today and am absolutely ecstatic on getting a 750(Q-50,V-42).
The success is all the more sweet because this was my first attempt and I am relieved that I wouldn't have to pick up the books again. I have almost got fed up of studying.
I joined this forum in August, started my preparation in the week of October with full gusto. It all went pretty good for the initial two weeks when I started losing motivation to study. Finally started the preparation seriously in December first week by booking the GMAT appointment. So in all studied for around 3.5 months.
Here's a brief lowdown of how I studied:

Quant : I didn't have much trouble with Maths. Got the complete set of MGMAT Math strategy Guides .I especially loved MGMAT Number properties book . I had heard great reviews about Veritas Combinatorics and Probability book,so ordered that also which was pretty good. Did the official Guide Maths questions ,but found most of them to be too easy. Only the last 50-60 questions were good. Used tests from miscellaneous sources for practising maths questions.

Sentence Correction: I started Sentence correction with Aristotle SC Grail and then moved on MGMAT SC Guide. The SC Grail really helped me understand the SC in an easy way. I finished it within a week and then moved on to Manhattan SC Guide. After having practised the questions in the SC Grail questionbank, I moved on to OG12 and as suggested by the members here. I ensured that I was focusing on reading the explanations instead of plainly practising questions. I probably read all the explanations to questions and since I already had a good grasp of the grammatical concepts and the error types tested, I could understand the explanations(which otherwise sounded cryptic) easily.By reading the explanations, I think I think that I could train myself how to recognize errors easily.

Critical Reasnoning : Initially, I'd attempt all the CR question with no particular strategy as I thought that CR is all about logic. Although the accuracy rate was not bad,but then also I knew that there would definitely be some concrete strategies for tackling CR. Did some research on the internet and came across a couple of videos by Ron Purewal and then used MGMAT CR Guide. What I learnt was that each question type in CR has to be tackled in a particular way and using a generalized approach for all types of questions though may work in lower difficulty level questions, but it will not be effective in higher difficulty ones. I learnt these strategies inside out, and knew that I could handle CR questions confidently.

Reading Comprehension: I have been quite a voracious reader so I thought that I do not need to prepare for RCs which to some extent was true. However, as I practised RCs ,I realized that a lot of times I was not able to comprehend passages properly because I had big time problem maintaining my concentration while reading the passages . Secondly, in difficult passages ,I couldn't remember what I had read in the previous paragraphs. So as the experts suggest here, I started taking notes and contrary to what I had thought, the method worked. I started with the passages in the official guide and then moved on to Aristotle RC. I did almost all the passages in OG12 . The passages in Aristotle RC were quite good and made me feel quite confident to tackle RCs on the GMAT!

Practice Tests
MGMAT CAT 1 # 680, CAT 2 # 700 , CAT 3# 720 , CAT 4# 680 ,CAT 5 # 690 , CAT 6 #700
GMAT PREP 1 # 710 , GMAT PREP 2 # 720
Actual GMAT # 750 (50,44)

As you can see ,my scores hovered between 680-720 in most of the CATs ,and I was expecting something in a similar range but it was a surprise how I landed up with a 750. I am seriously clueless as to how I scored a 750 and can't think of explanations except for the fact that luck was on side. Though I had prepared well for Verbal, but a score of 44 is ridiculously high for me(not that I am complaining now! :D)
Here are my thoughts on the GMAT

1. It's a lot about the D-day: After seeing my score,I think that the GMAT is a lot about your performance on the actual exam. I was basically not aiming for a very high score and would have been happy even with a 700 but seems like the Gods were smiling on me during the test and fortunately I landed up with a much score higher than I would have anticipated.

2. Remaining motivated : I guess this was the biggest problem I had faced in the initial stage of my preparation. Although I had time but I had difficulty remaining motivated as studying at the age of 28 would be the last thing you would like to do. So I booked my date in November itself and as the countdown began, I could feel that the GMAT was slowly moving from the periphery to the center of my life.

3. Do not study extremely difficult material: I know we all have the urge to study the most difficult of the material simply because we feel that that would give us a reassurance of the fact that we are tackling the hardest material out there. I believe that that is an illusion. There's no point in wasting time doing unreasonably difficult questions as doing that is ,firstly, not helpful and secondly, it will give you a false estimate about the kind of questions you're likely to see on the GMAT . I had done a couple of questions from the "Brutal SC document" and i had gotten almost all questions wrong. Even after going through the explanations, I knew that I'm not learning anything from these questions and even on the worse day, the GMAT is not gonna throw that brutal questions-in fact, the questions in the brutal SC document are not even GMAT type in the way they test the errors.

4. You can get a good score even without getting all questions correctt: I had gotten a couple of question in Quant on the GMAT which looked difficult to me. I admit that I did plain(or maybe educated) guesswork on 4-5 questions on Quant . Though I panicked for sometime thinking that I am doomed ,but in the end a score of 50 on the Quant indicates that I did not do badly on Quant. I think the biggest lesson I learnt from this is that managing time-not wasting an inordinate amount of time-is as important as getting a question correct.

Am ecstatic about getting a 750 and I think this was the greatest surprise I have been given in life so far. Now with this score, I think I'll look at better schools. Thanks for reading this post and thanks to all the members here. The moral of the story is "EVERY DOG HAS HIS DAY" :)
Last edited by Paulrichards on Mon Feb 27, 2012 4:21 am, edited 6 times in total.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 320
Joined: Sun Aug 15, 2010 7:09 am
Thanked: 116 times
Followed by:52 members
GMAT Score:760

by rishi raj » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:06 am
I liked the ending of your story.Lol! Congratulations!
I think that you might have gotten most of the experimental questions wrong . Or probably it was just your day .

Legendary Member
Posts: 857
Joined: Wed Aug 25, 2010 1:36 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:15 members

by AIM GMAT » Thu Mar 17, 2011 8:45 am
Hey Paulrichards congrats for a wonderful score !!! You did study almost everything . Debrief always gives boost to the ppl like me . Good luck with your apps .

Cheers , its party time for you :) .
Thanks & Regards,
AIM GMAT

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 136
Joined: Wed Apr 08, 2009 12:09 pm
Thanked: 4 times
Followed by:1 members

by Troika » Thu Mar 17, 2011 9:30 am
Congrats on the awesome score! Your debrief is informative and inspirational.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 218
Joined: Sat Jul 24, 2010 2:43 pm
Thanked: 5 times

by cyrwr1 » Thu Mar 17, 2011 10:08 am
Cheers !

I expect to join you here in one month's time!

Happy St. Patty's Day!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

by Paulrichards » Fri Mar 18, 2011 8:51 am
Thanks a lot for your wishes,guys!
Since yesterday, I have been still trying to figure out the possible reasons. I think that since there are 6-10 experimental questions on each of the two sections, there's a good probability that the questions which I might have gotten wrong would mostly have been experimental questions as a result of which I got good scores on both the sections. High coincidence, but possible!

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 965
Joined: Thu Jan 28, 2010 12:52 am
Thanked: 156 times
Followed by:34 members
GMAT Score:720

by vineeshp » Fri Mar 18, 2011 7:21 pm
Can we exchange our scores? :P

Congrats bro.
Vineesh,
Just telling you what I know and think. I am not the expert. :)

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 20
Joined: Tue Feb 22, 2011 3:09 am
Thanked: 1 times
GMAT Score:720

by PS2011 » Fri Mar 18, 2011 9:24 pm
Paulrichards wrote:Thanks a lot for your wishes,guys!
Since yesterday, I have been still trying to figure out the possible reasons. I think that since there are 6-10 experimental questions on each of the two sections, there's a good probability that the questions which I might have gotten wrong would mostly have been experimental questions as a result of which I got good scores on both the sections. High coincidence, but possible!
This is a known shortcoming of the GMAT. Every now and then it may work to someones advantage but even then I don't think scores can move beyond +30/-30 range as law of averages would defy getting only the experimental ones wrong. I am sure even otherwise you would have scored around 720!!!

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 94
Joined: Fri Jan 14, 2011 7:44 pm
Location: Bangalore, India
Thanked: 2 times
Followed by:5 members

by amar66 » Sun Mar 20, 2011 9:00 am
Truely motivating....!!!

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

by Paulrichards » Tue Mar 22, 2011 12:30 am
PS2011 wrote:
This is a known shortcoming of the GMAT. Every now and then it may work to someones advantage but even then I don't think scores can move beyond +30/-30 range as law of averages would defy getting only the experimental ones wrong. I am sure even otherwise you would have scored around 720!!!
Yeah, you're correct. The other reason apart from getting experimental questions wrong is that probably I got many non-experimental questions correct. Since I had prepared diligently for the Verbal section, maybe I climaxed on the GMAT day resulting in a 44 on the Verbal section. Anyway, all said and done, I'm happy now. :)

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

by Paulrichards » Sun Mar 27, 2011 1:51 am
Guys, can you please suggest which schools would be good for me. I am looking for Consulting and more inclined towards European programmes

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 6
Joined: Wed Dec 08, 2010 4:09 am

by cvsatish » Sun Mar 27, 2011 3:05 am
Nice ! I was hoping to give such a debrief .. darn, I almost envy you :p !

But, you do deserve what you get, so congrats - you are the Slumdog millionaire, adding to your final line ;)

User avatar
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 8:58 pm

by andressa » Mon Mar 28, 2011 5:37 am
Paulrichards wrote:Thanks a lot for your wishes,guys!
Since yesterday, I have been still trying to figure out the possible reasons. I think that since there are 6-10 experimental questions on each of the two sections, there's a good probability that the questions which I might have gotten wrong would mostly have been experimental questions as a result of which I got good scores on both the sections. High coincidence, but possible!
How do you know when there are experimental questions on the two sections?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 3
Joined: Mon Mar 07, 2011 7:00 am

by dharan » Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:36 am
Hi , Congratulations !!!!!! for your great score.

Can you throw a light on OG questions ?
How did it helped you ?.
In what level you put OG questions compared to real GMAT ?
Did you answer all the OG questions, right ?

Your response is appreciated.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 40
Joined: Mon Aug 16, 2010 8:27 am
Thanked: 7 times
Followed by:2 members

by Paulrichards » Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:08 am
andressa wrote:
How do you know when there are experimental questions on the two sections?
You cannot know which options are experimental and which are not. Had the test takers known which are experimental, they wouldn't even attempt these questions seriously because they would know that the responses to those questions do not matter even if you get them correct or not.
Can you throw a light on OG questions ?
How did it helped you ?.
In what level you put OG questions compared to real GMAT ?
Did you answer all the OG questions, right ?
The questions in the Official Guide are arranged in increasing order of difficulty level. In Quant, the questions on the GMAT are certainly trickier and tougher than those in the OG. I didn't get all the questions in the OG correct. My accuracy in Verbal sections on the official Guide questions was around 80% . However, I focused less on accuracy and more on what I learnt from the questions. I think the Verbal questions in the official guide are quite good.