Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuation in the financial market.
A)so gradual as to be indistinguishable
B)so gradual that they can be indistinguishable
C)so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D)gradual enough not to be distinguishable
E)gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
Gmatprep
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 416
- Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 12:48 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:6 members
- Geva@EconomistGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
- Thanked: 378 times
- Followed by:123 members
- GMAT Score:760
It's A.shrutee wrote:Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuation in the financial market.
A)so gradual as to be indistinguishable
B)so gradual that they can be indistinguishable
C)so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D)gradual enough not to be distinguishable
E)gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
It's an idiom - the construction so+adjective has three possible correct continuations:
so....as to
example: A above. ...So gradual as to be indistinguishable.
so....that + clause
example: ...So gradual that they are indistinguishable.
so....,(nothing)
example: ...so gradual, they are indistinguishable.
C is awkward and opens up a possible illogical meaning: "unable to be distinguished" implies a will or intent by the shifts to be distinguished - as if the shifts "want" to be distinguished, but "are unable" to - which is complete foolishness.
Don't let something that "sounds bad" direct you away from logic - I suspect that those who chose C probably knew deep down that they were choosing the wrong answer, but chose it anyway because they did not know the construction in A. The devil you know is not always better than the devil you don't.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 627
- Joined: Thu Jun 23, 2011 9:12 am
- Thanked: 4 times
- Followed by:1 members
@Geva: I have problem with A, so...as to be, brings about an intent in the economic shifts to be indistinguishable, which is really not the case. I would prefer B, which makes more sense.
Please comment.
Thanks
Mankey
Please comment.
Thanks
Mankey
- Geva@EconomistGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
- Thanked: 378 times
- Followed by:123 members
- GMAT Score:760
It doesn't imply any intent ("the light is so bright as to blind the viewer" does not imply any intent by the light to blind), but it's an idiom, which means that the argument is pointless - there are no rules here - it's just ok the way it is. B is also grammatically correct, it's just longer and less concise that A.mankey wrote:@Geva: I have problem with A, so...as to be, brings about an intent in the economic shifts to be indistinguishable, which is really not the case. I would prefer B, which makes more sense.
Please comment.
Thanks
Mankey
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
pls, help. Is B wrong because B changes the meaning of A from fact to "can "?Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:It's A.shrutee wrote:Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuation in the financial market.
A)so gradual as to be indistinguishable
B)so gradual that they can be indistinguishable
C)so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D)gradual enough not to be distinguishable
E)gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
It's an idiom - the construction so+adjective has three possible correct continuations:
so....as to
example: A above. ...So gradual as to be indistinguishable.
so....that + clause
example: ...So gradual that they are indistinguishable.
so....,(nothing)
example: ...so gradual, they are indistinguishable.
C is awkward and opens up a possible illogical meaning: "unable to be distinguished" implies a will or intent by the shifts to be distinguished - as if the shifts "want" to be distinguished, but "are unable" to - which is complete foolishness.
Don't let something that "sounds bad" direct you away from logic - I suspect that those who chose C probably knew deep down that they were choosing the wrong answer, but chose it anyway because they did not know the construction in A. The devil you know is not always better than the devil you don't.
Hi Shrutee,
Please post the question from the reliable source. In the original GMATPrep question, option B is different.
so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
Please don't tweak the original options in case you did. It unnecessarily creates the confusion.
Please post the question from the reliable source. In the original GMATPrep question, option B is different.
so gradual so that they can be indistinguishable
Please don't tweak the original options in case you did. It unnecessarily creates the confusion.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1404
- Joined: Tue May 20, 2008 6:55 pm
- Thanked: 18 times
- Followed by:2 members
B is wrong because it change the meaning of the original A from fact to non-fact "can". Is that right?Geva@MasterGMAT wrote:It's A.shrutee wrote:Often major economic shifts are so gradual as to be indistinguishable at first from ordinary fluctuation in the financial market.
A)so gradual as to be indistinguishable
B)so gradual that they can be indistinguishable
C)so gradual that they are unable to be distinguished
D)gradual enough not to be distinguishable
E)gradual enough so that one cannot distinguish them
It's an idiom - the construction so+adjective has three possible correct continuations:
so....as to
example: A above. ...So gradual as to be indistinguishable.
so....that + clause
example: ...So gradual that they are indistinguishable.
so....,(nothing)
example: ...so gradual, they are indistinguishable.
C is awkward and opens up a possible illogical meaning: "unable to be distinguished" implies a will or intent by the shifts to be distinguished - as if the shifts "want" to be distinguished, but "are unable" to - which is complete foolishness.
Don't let something that "sounds bad" direct you away from logic - I suspect that those who chose C probably knew deep down that they were choosing the wrong answer, but chose it anyway because they did not know the construction in A. The devil you know is not always better than the devil you don't.