Critical Reasoning

According to a recent research study, more than 90% percent of graduates of private high schools in a certain county continue their education in college. By contrast, only 65% of graduates of public high schools subsequently pursue college education. Therefore, if parents in the county wish to increase the likelihood that their children will attend college, they should send them to private rather than public schools.

Which of the following statements would most seriously weaken the argument above?

(A) Graduates of private schools typically score higher on standardized tests and other tests of academic achievement.
(B) While private schools are typically very expensive, attendance of public school is free for the residents of the county.
(C) In comparison with graduates of private schools, a substantially greater proportion of public school graduates receive need-based financial aid for their college education.
(D) In comparison with private schools, public schools provide more opportunities for student involvement in sports and other athletic activities, which almost always increase the likelihood of students' acceptance to colleges.
(E) Since most public schools are located in rural areas of the county populated primarily by farmers, nearly 30% of students from public high schools choose to pursue farming occupations rather than apply to colleges.

Conclusion: if parents in the county wish to increase the likelihood that their children will attend college, they should send them to private rather than public schools

Weaken...
A) Nowhere it is mentioned that highest score means college education.
B) Money issue is out of scope.
C) Again out of scope.
D) Then it must be true now also but %of public school high students pursuing college education is more.
E) Correct. 30% chose farming and thus 65% out of 70% chose college. thus 92% chose college which is higher than 90% of private high school. Weakens the conclusion...

yes, It is E as explained by Cans.