Wildlife expert...

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 49
Joined: Wed Jun 10, 2009 12:07 pm

Wildlife expert...

by necromancer_678 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 1:35 pm
34. A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.
(A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
(B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than
(C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
(D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
(E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than


what is the deciding factor for choosing will / would .

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Mon Feb 19, 2007 6:26 pm

by lamhe » Wed Jun 17, 2009 3:21 pm
I will go with D....

Greater than is the correct usage and will is needed....

generally would will be preferre din prediction as in A but the usage of numerous is wrong and hence best choice left is D....
Vishal

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:42 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by mittalashwani13 » Wed Jun 17, 2009 4:02 pm
It depends upon the If...Then clause... and here is the general rule..


IF ...(present clause) ....then ...(will + verb)
If ...(simple past) ....then ...(Would/should + verb)
If ...(past perfect) ....then ...(would/should + have + verb)

In this question,

34. A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.
(A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than - 2 problems .. If present clause ..then would fail ...and more numerous is redundant
(B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than ...leaving If...then clause all together
(C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
(D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
(E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than - 2 problems .. If clause is a simple past and then clause is "will fail" and more numerous is redundant...

Between C & D ... we need present tense here logically not a simple past tense ... so D is right...

hope this is helpful

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by thetrystero » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:26 pm
34. A wildlife expert predicts that the reintroduction of the caribou into northern Minnesota would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than one wolf for every 39 square miles.
(A) would fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more numerous than
(B) would fail provided the density of the timber wolf population in that region is more than
(C) should fail if the timber wolf density in that region was greater than
(D) will fail if the density of the timber wolf population in that region is greater than
(E) will fail if the timber wolf density in that region were more numerous than
My answer: D

A: density more numerous -- wrong measure for density
B: provided -- incorrect qualifier
C: should fail -- incorrect qualifier
E: timber wolf density -- density modifies timber wolf, not population

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 31
Joined: Wed May 20, 2009 7:06 pm
Location: Shanghai, China, the People's Republic of

by marshmallow » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:44 pm
I don't think a will/would question should be involved here. I think a key factor is that the A of B structure is superior to B A.
Feel free to correct me.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 154
Joined: Mon Apr 13, 2009 10:57 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by thetrystero » Wed Jun 17, 2009 5:45 pm
mittalashwani13 wrote:
IF ...(present clause) ....then ...(will + verb)
If ...(simple past) ....then ...(Would/should + verb)
If ...(past perfect) ....then ...(would/should + have + verb)

Between C & D ... we need present tense here logically not a simple past
Nice rules. can you please post the source for the rules?

Why does simple past not make logical sense?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 186
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2009 4:57 am
Thanked: 7 times
GMAT Score:720

by gmat_dest » Sat Jul 04, 2009 10:50 pm
I saw a variant of it...

everything is same except 'could' replaces 'should' .
Should has a different meaning I feel according to OG.
It has a sense of obligation.

Anyway, I saw these rules in MGMAT SC.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 183
Joined: Sun Aug 22, 2010 1:02 am
Location: Switzerland
Thanked: 5 times

by Fractal » Sat Aug 27, 2011 5:50 am
According to OG, in B) one has to use " greater" instead of "more".

Why? As far as I know, "more" can be used for countable and uncountable nouns, so both "greater" and "more" should be correct?

thx

Legendary Member
Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
Thanked: 88 times
Followed by:13 members

by aspirant2011 » Sat Aug 27, 2011 9:01 am
remember a rule-

if he wins he will distribute sweets
if he won he would distribute sweets
if he had won he would have distributed sweets