There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
Could someone help ?
LSAT Artists
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
- sunnyjohn
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
IMO : E
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.
Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.
Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Most according to Powerscore CR is 51-100 %sunnyjohn wrote:IMO : E
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.
Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:58 am
- Thanked: 2 times
- GMAT Score:650
mundasingh123 wrote:There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
## Incorrect. Second statement of the argument clearly states MOST of them..
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope. May be it is true but can't be proved by the above argument.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
## Incorrect.Not claimed for ANY artist but for most of them
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
## Correct.
Whats the OA
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Acorn wrote:I know the OA . I wanted the Explanation, not the OAmundasingh123 wrote:There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
## Incorrect. Second statement of the argument clearly states MOST of them..
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope. May be it is true but can't be proved by the above argument.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
## Incorrect.Not claimed for ANY artist but for most of them
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
## Correct.
Whats the OA
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
- sunnyjohn
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
I believe Most is 50+ to 100-, but not exactly 100%.mundasingh123 wrote:Most according to Powerscore CR is 51-100 %sunnyjohn wrote:IMO : E
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.
Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
- sunnyjohn
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
Some = 0+ to 100-mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-
In simple terms=
Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99
Please correct me If I am wrong.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the abovesunnyjohn wrote:Some = 0+ to 100-mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-
In simple terms=
Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99
Please correct me If I am wrong.
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
- HSPA
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1101
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
- Thanked: 47 times
- Followed by:13 members
- GMAT Score:640
A small update from my side
many = 51 to 99 = Most
many = 51 to 99 = Most
mundasingh123 wrote:Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the abovesunnyjohn wrote:Some = 0+ to 100-mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-
In simple terms=
Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99
Please correct me If I am wrong.
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
I Seek Explanations Not Answers
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2789
- Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
- Location: Chennai, India
- Thanked: 206 times
- Followed by:43 members
- GMAT Score:640
Better share it with the forum, if you know stuffs!mundasingh123 wrote:@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
Would be of great use. TIA
- sunnyjohn
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
I will verify and correct it ASAP.mundasingh123 wrote:@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
- sunnyjohn
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
- Thanked: 28 times
- Followed by:3 members
- GMAT Score:700
Nopes, MANY == SOMEHSPA wrote:A small update from my side
many = 51 to 99 = Most
mundasingh123 wrote:Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the abovesunnyjohn wrote:Some = 0+ to 100-mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-
In simple terms=
Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99
Please correct me If I am wrong.
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 2330
- Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
- Thanked: 56 times
- Followed by:26 members
You must mention the source if you found the above estimates in some book
I Seek Explanations Not Answers