LSAT Artists

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

LSAT Artists

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 7:47 am
There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
Could someone help ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:40 am
IMO : E

There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.

Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.



Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:51 am
sunnyjohn wrote:IMO : E

There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.

Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.



Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
Most according to Powerscore CR is 51-100 %
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 42
Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:58 am
Thanked: 2 times
GMAT Score:650

by Acorn » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:53 am
mundasingh123 wrote:There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.

## Incorrect. Second statement of the argument clearly states MOST of them..
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.

## Incorrect. Out of Scope. May be it is true but can't be proved by the above argument.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.

## Incorrect.Not claimed for ANY artist but for most of them
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

## Correct.

Whats the OA

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 8:56 am
Acorn wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.
Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.

## Incorrect. Second statement of the argument clearly states MOST of them..
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.

## Incorrect. Out of Scope. May be it is true but can't be proved by the above argument.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.

## Incorrect.Not claimed for ANY artist but for most of them
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
## Incorrect. Out of Scope.
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.

## Correct.

Whats the OA
I know the OA . I wanted the Explanation, not the OA
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:15 am
mundasingh123 wrote:
sunnyjohn wrote:IMO : E

There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues. Most of them hold political views that are less insightful than those of any reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist. Indeed, when taken as a whole, the statements made by artists, including those considered great, indicate that artistic talent and political insight are rarely found together.

P1: Most artists have less insights than any well educated person who is not artist.
P2: Artistic talent and political insights are rarely found together.

Conclusion: There is little point in looking to artists for insights into political issues.



Which one of the following can be inferred from the passage?
(A) There are no artists who have insights into political issues.
This is not true, as its clearly mention that they do have less insights than well educated persons.
(B) A thorough education in art makers a person reasonably well educated.
Effect of education, its out of scope.
(C) Every reasonably well-educated person who is not an artist has more insight into political issues than any artist.
Look at the word EVERY, P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
(D) Politicians rarely have any artistic talent.
Out of scope
(E) Some artists are no less politically insightful than some reasonably well-educated persons who are not artists.
P1 says - most (assume 51%) artists have less insights than ..., this means 49% still have more or equal insights than ....
Most according to Powerscore CR is 51-100 %
I believe Most is 50+ to 100-, but not exactly 100%.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Tue Aug 23, 2011 9:54 am
what is the range of some ?
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Tue Aug 23, 2011 6:59 pm
mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
Some = 0+ to 100-
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-

In simple terms=

Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99

Please correct me If I am wrong.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 7:57 am
sunnyjohn wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
Some = 0+ to 100-
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-

In simple terms=

Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99

Please correct me If I am wrong.
Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the above
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 1101
Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 7:26 am
Thanked: 47 times
Followed by:13 members
GMAT Score:640

by HSPA » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:19 am
A small update from my side

many = 51 to 99 = Most
mundasingh123 wrote:
sunnyjohn wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
Some = 0+ to 100-
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-

In simple terms=

Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99

Please correct me If I am wrong.
Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the above
First take: 640 (50M, 27V) - RC needs 300% improvement
Second take: coming soon..
Regards,
HSPA.

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 9:21 am
@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
I Seek Explanations Not Answers

Legendary Member
Posts: 2789
Joined: Tue Jul 26, 2011 12:19 am
Location: Chennai, India
Thanked: 206 times
Followed by:43 members
GMAT Score:640

by GmatKiss » Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:51 am
mundasingh123 wrote:@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
Better share it with the forum, if you know stuffs!
Would be of great use. TIA

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:38 pm
mundasingh123 wrote:@sunnyjohn Well i think those are your own assumtions. I cant say about the rest but Powerscore does say the the magnitude of some ranges from 1 to 100
I will verify and correct it ASAP.

User avatar
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 344
Joined: Mon Sep 14, 2009 5:40 am
Thanked: 28 times
Followed by:3 members
GMAT Score:700

by sunnyjohn » Wed Aug 24, 2011 8:39 pm
HSPA wrote:A small update from my side

many = 51 to 99 = Most
mundasingh123 wrote:
sunnyjohn wrote:
mundasingh123 wrote:what is the range of some ?
Some = 0+ to 100-
All = 100
None = 0
Not All = 0 to 100-

In simple terms=

Some = 1 to 99
Many = 1 to 99
All = 100
None = 0
Not all = 0 to 99
Most = 51 to 99

Please correct me If I am wrong.
Is this your opinion or do u have a source to verify the above
Nopes, MANY == SOME

Legendary Member
Posts: 2330
Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 5:14 am
Thanked: 56 times
Followed by:26 members

by mundasingh123 » Wed Aug 24, 2011 10:06 pm
You must mention the source if you found the above estimates in some book
I Seek Explanations Not Answers