Reading Comprehension

Historians have identified two dominant currents
in the Russian women's movement of the late tsarist
period. "Bourgeois" feminism, so called by its more
radical opponents, emphasized "individualist" feminist
goals such as access to education, career opportunities,
and legal equality. "Socialist" feminists, by contrast,
emphasized class, rather than gender, as the principal
source of women's inequality and oppression, and
socialist revolution, not legal reform, as the only road
to emancipation and equality.

However, despite antagonism between bourgeois
feminists and socialist feminists, the two movements
shared certain underlying beliefs. Both regarded paid
labor as the principal means by which women might
attain emancipation: participation in the workplace
and economic self-sufficiency, they believed, would
make women socially useful and therefore deserving of
equality with men. Both groups also recognized the
enormous difficulties women faced when they
combined paid labor with motherhood. In fact, at the
First All-Russian Women's Congress in 1908, most
participants advocated maternity insurance and paid
maternity leave, although the intense hostility between
some socialists and bourgeois feminists at the
Congress made it difficult for them to recognize these
areas of agreement. Finally, socialist feminists and
most bourgeois feminists concurred in subordinating
women's emancipation to what they considered the
more important goal of liberating the entire Russian
population from political oppression, economic
backwardness, and social injustice.

Q The Passage is primarily concerned with

Identifying points of agreement between the 2 groups

advocating one approach to social reform over other

contrasting 2 approaches to solve a political problem

arguing that views of one group was mopre radical than the other group

criticizing historians for overlooking similarities between the views espoused by 2 dissimilar groups.

Doubt: In this Q the OA is A, but the first para of the RC also mentions about the disimilarities, so it does not include that in the OA.Are we suppose to go by the length of the paragraph to see relative importance ? I usually thought 1st paragraph contain more weightage over other paragraphs when it concerns such type of questions .

1 more advice required , how to approach such difficult passages , i got all questions wrong while writing the CAT. The entire time spent on this passage was a waste !

It is common for an author of a short text such as this one to describe what is known or commonly believed in the first paragraph, and proceed to offer new insights or a refutation in subsequent paragraphs. This is often the case when the second paragraph begins with the word 'however'

I was also confused by some short paragraph but realized later what Kevin has written.

treat short passages little differently than long passages.