Several years ago the diet industry introduced a variety of appetite suppressants, but some of these drugs caused stomach disorders severe enough to have them banned by the Food and Drug Administration.
(A) stomach disorders severe enough to have them
(B) stomach disorders that were severe enough so they were
(C) stomach disorders of such severity so as to be
(D) such severe stomach disorders that they were
(E) such severe stomach disorders as to be
[spoiler]OA: In D isn't "they" ambiguous[/spoiler]
Several years ago the diet industry
This topic has expert replies
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
- Target2009
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:5 members
IMO - D
You are right "Here THEY can refer to stomach disorders or drugs ". But all other choices are having other issues and ambiguity is not absolute rule to cross of option. So we still can go with D.
You are right "Here THEY can refer to stomach disorders or drugs ". But all other choices are having other issues and ambiguity is not absolute rule to cross of option. So we still can go with D.
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
- bubbliiiiiiii
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 979
- Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 1:38 am
- Location: Hyderabad, India
- Thanked: 49 times
- Followed by:12 members
- GMAT Score:700
- Target2009
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:5 members
@Pranay: "A" also has referent issue for "them" but to me "enough to have them" seems to be less preferable to "such ..that" construction in "D".bubbliiiiiiii wrote:whats wrong with A?
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
Hi Target2009,
whats wrong with option C.......... I chose C because I found "them" to be ambiguous in option D and also in option C idiom "so x as to be y" is being used
whats wrong with option C.......... I chose C because I found "them" to be ambiguous in option D and also in option C idiom "so x as to be y" is being used
- Target2009
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:5 members
SUCH...SO AS TO BE... Seems u missed Such.aspirant2011 wrote:Hi Target2009,
whats wrong with option C.......... I chose C because I found "them" to be ambiguous in option D and also in option C idiom "so x as to be y" is being used
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1574
- Joined: Fri Jan 28, 2011 2:52 am
- Thanked: 88 times
- Followed by:13 members
- Stuart@KaplanGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3225
- Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
- Location: Toronto
- Thanked: 1710 times
- Followed by:614 members
- GMAT Score:800
Here's the important thing to remember about pronoun ambiguity: it's a style issue, not a grammar issue. So, if you have to choose between two choices, both of which are grammatically correct but one of which is ambiguous, go with the non-ambiguous choice.
However, when all the choices contain the same level of ambiguity, you can completely ignore the issue. On this particular question none of the choices make it explicitly clear that "banned" refers to the suppressants, so ambiguity is a non-issue. Remember, getting rid of the pronoun without replacing it with a better reference word doesn't fix the problem (which is why (C) isn't any less ambiguous than the other choices).
There have definitely been real GMAT questions that used ambiguous pronouns; in each such case, the parent noun was clear from the context of the sentence. In most cases a previous pronoun in the sentence makes it clear to what the latter phrase is referring (in this question, the pronoun "these" sets the precedent for "they" to refer back to the suppressants).
However, when all the choices contain the same level of ambiguity, you can completely ignore the issue. On this particular question none of the choices make it explicitly clear that "banned" refers to the suppressants, so ambiguity is a non-issue. Remember, getting rid of the pronoun without replacing it with a better reference word doesn't fix the problem (which is why (C) isn't any less ambiguous than the other choices).
There have definitely been real GMAT questions that used ambiguous pronouns; in each such case, the parent noun was clear from the context of the sentence. In most cases a previous pronoun in the sentence makes it clear to what the latter phrase is referring (in this question, the pronoun "these" sets the precedent for "they" to refer back to the suppressants).
Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto
Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course