least value venn diagram

This topic has expert replies
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

least value venn diagram

by agganitk » Sat Oct 10, 2009 11:30 am
According to a survey, at least 70% of people like apples, at least 75% like bananas and at least 80% like cherries. What is the minimum percentage of people who like all three?

A. 15%
B. 20%
C. 25%
D. 0%
E. 35%

Ans??

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:11 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 4 times

by nithi_mystics » Sat Oct 10, 2009 3:18 pm
Is it 25% ?
Thanks
Nithi

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Sat Oct 10, 2009 4:33 pm
I am getting 15%..is that the correct answer?

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

by agganitk » Sun Oct 11, 2009 12:55 am
Can you anyone briefly explain the solution for this problem ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 128
Joined: Thu Jul 30, 2009 1:46 pm
Thanked: 1 times

Re: least value venn diagram

by fruti_yum » Sun Oct 11, 2009 5:32 am
agganitk wrote:According to a survey, at least 70% of people like apples, at least 75% like bananas and at least 80% like cherries. What is the minimum percentage of people who like all three?

A. 15%
B. 20%
C. 25%
D. 0%
E. 35%

Ans??
have no idea about this one

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:11 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 4 times

by nithi_mystics » Sun Oct 11, 2009 7:37 am
I am not sure if my approach is right or if I have missed something in my calculation. But here it goes..

We need to find the minimum percentage of people who like all three. So, I take the minimum value for the percentage of people who like each fruit.

70% of people like apples,
75% like bananas and
80% like cherries

Our aim is to minimize the number of people who like all three. So whatever explanation is given below is aiming at that.

1) 80 like cherries and 20 do not.

2) 75 like bananas and 25 do not.
Now lets say the 25 who don't like bananas like cherries and out of the 75 who like banana, 20 do not like cherries and the remaining 55% like both.
====> ie 55 like both cherries and bananas and the remaining 45 like either cherries or bananas but not both.

3) 70 like apples and 30 do not.
Lets say, 30 who do not like apples, like cherries and bananas. So thats 55-30 = 25.
So out of 70 who like apples, 25 like all three.

There must be a much simpler way of solving this problem. But I am not able to think of any.

Agganitk, can you post the OA?
Thanks
Nithi

User avatar
Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 55
Joined: Mon Sep 07, 2009 9:11 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 4 times

by nithi_mystics » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:11 am
OA plz..
Thanks
Nithi

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 52
Joined: Fri Oct 09, 2009 2:33 am
Thanked: 1 times

by agganitk » Mon Oct 12, 2009 8:16 am
oA is 25%

Legendary Member
Posts: 1161
Joined: Mon May 12, 2008 2:52 am
Location: Sydney
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members

by mehravikas » Mon Oct 12, 2009 11:35 am
Don't understand how to solve this question. Can someone help please?

Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 2
Joined: Sun Sep 27, 2009 3:14 am
Thanked: 16 times
Followed by:1 members

by wontheGMAT » Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:17 pm
70% eat apples means: it includes those who eat
  • Only Apple -OA
    Apples, and Bananas - AB
    Apples and Cherry - AC
    Apples, Bananas and Cherry =ABC


75% eat Bananas means: it includes those who eat
  • Only Bananas -OB
    Bananas and Apple - AB
    Bananas and Cherry - BC
    Apples, Bananas and Cherry =ABC


Total in the set=100% = OA + OB + OC + AB+AC+BC+ABC
70 = Only OA + AB + AC + ABC
75 = Only OB + AB + BC + ABC
80 = Only OC + BC + AC + ABC

70+75+80= OA + OB + OC + 2AB+2AC+2BC+3ABC
225= 100 + AB + AC + BC + 2ABC .........eq1

Now remaining
30% eat = BC
25% Eat = AC
20% Eat = AB

30+25+20 = AB + AC + BC = 75...........eq2

Substitute this in eq1

225= 100 + 75 + 2ABC
225-175 = 2 ABC
ABC = 25 ... People who eat all three fruits

Legendary Member
Posts: 882
Joined: Fri Feb 20, 2009 2:57 pm
Thanked: 15 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:690

by crackgmat007 » Tue Nov 03, 2009 4:58 pm
Is there an easier way to solve this question?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 138
Joined: Mon Mar 02, 2009 12:02 pm
Thanked: 15 times

by life is a test » Wed Nov 04, 2009 8:16 am
My attempt at an explanation in the attached diag.

hope that helps.
Attachments
venn.JPG

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 3225
Joined: Tue Jan 08, 2008 2:40 pm
Location: Toronto
Thanked: 1710 times
Followed by:614 members
GMAT Score:800

Re: least value venn diagram

by Stuart@KaplanGMAT » Wed Nov 04, 2009 9:30 am
agganitk wrote:According to a survey, at least 70% of people like apples, at least 75% like bananas and at least 80% like cherries. What is the minimum percentage of people who like all three?

A. 15%
B. 20%
C. 25%
D. 0%
E. 35%

Ans??
Let's say we have 100 people to make things simple. We want to minimize the triple group, so let's minimize how many people like each kind of fruit, giving us:

70 apple lovers, 75 banana lovers and 80 cherry lovers.

Now, 70 + 75 + 80 = 225, so we have 225 "fruit loves" spread out among 100 people.

Therefore, there are 125 more "fruit loves" than there are people.

Our job is to minimize the number of people who love all 3; to do so, we want to maximize the number of people who love exactly 2 of the 3 and minimize the number of people who love exactly 1 of the 3.

So, we can come up with two equations:

AB + AC + BC + 2ABC = 125

and

AB + AC + BC + ABC = 100

AB = number who like just apple/banana
AC = number who like just apple/cherry
BC = number who like just banana/cherry
ABC = number who like all 3

The first equation is derived from the triple-overlapping set equation:

True # of objects = (total # in group 1) + (total # in group 2) + (total # in group 3) - (# in exactly 2 groups) - 2(# in all 3 groups)

100 = 70 + 75 + 80 - AB - AC - BC - 2(ABC)

and when we rearrange to get all variables on one side:

AB + AC + BC + 2ABC = 125

The second equation is derived from another version of the triple-overlapping set equation:

True # of objects = (total in exactly 1 group) + (total in exactly 2 groups) + (total in exactly 3 groups)

We set the "total in exactly 1 group" to 0, so we get:

100 = 0 + AB + AC + BC + ABC

So, back to our equations:

AB + AC + BC + 2ABC = 125
AB + AC + BC + ABC = 100

If we subtract the second from the first, we get:

ABC = 25... done!

Now, at this point you may be saying, "umm.. ok.. but I asked for a simple way to solve, that seemed super complicated and time consuming!"

However, if you understand the concepts behind triple-overlap (or double-overlap) questions, it's fairly intuitive; the complicated part is getting to the stage at which you have that deeper understanding.

Of course, this exact question won't appear on the GMAT. So, as always, after you do a question you ask yourself: "what did I learn from this question that's going to help me on future questions?"

Here's our takeaways:

1) there are multiple ways to solve overlapping sets questions. The more you familiarize yourself with the 3 major approaches (equations/venn diagrams/matrices(the last only works when there are 2 overlapping sets, unless you're really good at drawing a 3-dimensional matrix)), the more likely it is that the quickest approach will jump out at you on test day.

2) if you're shooting for a 600+, learn the two equations noted above.

3) whenever you're asked to minimize something, think "what do I need to maximize to achieve that result?"
Image

Stuart Kovinsky | Kaplan GMAT Faculty | Toronto

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience | Ready to Take a Free Practice Test? | Kaplan/Beat the GMAT Member Discount
BTG100 for $100 off a full course

Legendary Member
Posts: 869
Joined: Wed Aug 26, 2009 3:49 pm
Location: California
Thanked: 13 times
Followed by:3 members

by heshamelaziry » Wed Nov 04, 2009 10:18 am
I noticed in this problem that there are no numbers given for any groups, and there is no total number. MY questions are:

1- Do I use the two equations above for this kind of overlapping sets only ?

2- I tried to use the solution for the following question to solve for the above question, but didn't work. What is the difference ?

3- Do approaches differ from one overlapping sets problem to another ?

In a group of 68 students, each student is registered for at least one of three classes - History, Math and English. Twenty-five students are registered for History, twenty-five students are registered for Math, and thirty-four students are registered for English. If only three students are registered for all three classes, how many students are registered for exactly two classes?


[spoiler]History students: a + b + c + 3 = 25
Math students: e + b + d + 3 = 25
English students: f + c + d + 3 = 34
TOTAL students: a + e + f + b + c + d + 3 = 68

The question asks for the total number of students taking exactly 2 classes. This can be represented as b + c + d.

If we sum the first 3 equations (History, Math and English) we get:

a + e + f + 2b +2c +2d + 9 = 84.

Taking this equation and subtracting the 4th equation (Total students) yields the following:

a + e + f + 2b + 2c +2d + 9 = 84
-[a + e + f + b + c + d + 3 = 68]
b + c + d = 10
[/spoiler]

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 10
Joined: Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:23 am

by tarun.kirla » Thu Nov 05, 2009 11:48 am
thnaks Stuart Kovinsky...ur replies r really helpful and xcellent