Critical Reasoning

[spoiler]What Justifies A for Q8?Nowhere is it mentioned that only a comprehensive approach would work[/spoiler][/img]

let me know the OA, I think Q7 is C and Q8 is A. I will give reasoning after OA is posted.

Night reader wrote:let me know the OA, I think Q7 is C and Q8 is A. I will give reasoning after OA is posted.

Yes Correct

mundasingh123 wrote:

Night reader wrote:let me know the OA, I think Q7 is C and Q8 is A. I will give reasoning after OA is posted.

Yes Correct

Q7: "For example ... <-- listing an analogy here (but read the context too, everything must be supported by previous facts )Q8: fact test --> true type of question, restates everything given in the evidence and conclusion parts.

Night reader wrote:

mundasingh123 wrote:

Night reader wrote:let me know the OA, I think Q7 is C and Q8 is A. I will give reasoning after OA is posted.

Yes Correct

Q7: "For example ... <-- listing an analogy here (but read the context too, everything must be supported by previous facts )Q8: fact test --> true type of question, restates everything given in the evidence and conclusion parts.

What Justifies A for Q8?Nowhere is it mentioned that only a comprehensive approach would work[/img]

Q8-A: we need to find logical solutions --> both actors in the system (health-care providers and insurers) need to be impacted, therefore comprehensive approach is required.

mundasingh123 wrote:

[spoiler]What Justifies A for Q8?Nowhere is it mentioned that only a comprehensive approach would work[/spoiler][/img]

But comprehensive doesnt mean `balanced `;It doesnt have any connotations related to serving both ends

We don't balance here; neither we want to cover/embrace everything. The costs in the health care system must be reduced. Currently, the costs are shifted -e.g. from one actor to another. One way to put the costs under control (and subsequently reduce them) is to impact the actors in system (health-care providers and insurers). This will prevent the shift of costs.

mundasingh123 wrote:But comprehensive doesnt mean `balanced `;It doesnt have any connotations related to serving both ends