Many Ann: Our country should above all, be strong. Strength gains the respect of
other countries and makes a country admirable.
Inez: There are many examples in history of countries that were strong but used
their strength to commit atrocities. We should judge a country by the morality of its
actions, not by its strength. If the actions are morally good, the country is
admirable.
Which one of the following is a presupposition that underlies Inez' argument?
(A) At least one country is admirable
(B) Countries cannot be both strong and moral
(C) It is possible to assign moral weight to the actions of countries
(D) The citizens of any country does is good
(E) Countries should impose their standards of morality on other countries by whatever means necessary
this is a good one
This topic has expert replies
- Target2009
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 574
- Joined: Sat Oct 31, 2009 1:47 pm
- Location: USA
- Thanked: 29 times
- Followed by:5 members
IMO : Cmk101 wrote:Many Ann: Our country should above all, be strong. Strength gains the respect of
other countries and makes a country admirable.
Inez: There are many examples in history of countries that were strong but used
their strength to commit atrocities. We should judge a country by the morality of its
actions, not by its strength. If the actions are morally good, the country is
admirable.
(C) It is possible to assign moral weight to the actions of countries
Regards
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
Abhishek
------------------------------
MasterGmat Student
-
- Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
- Posts: 79
- Joined: Mon Sep 15, 2008 5:54 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
-
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 768
- Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 3:46 am
- Thanked: 21 times
- Followed by:7 members