Hey guys,
I have just started off with my gmat prep. I have been looking at a cuple of sources for CR questions. As many have suggested i have chosen the CR bible in which they suggest to read the passage first and then the question and provide a valid reason for tht.
but the rest of the sources all others i have encountered here suggest one should read the question first.
How do you approach these questions and why? please give your opinions.
R.S.
Read the question first?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 9
- Joined: Wed Dec 23, 2009 12:11 pm
- David@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 2193
- Joined: Mon Feb 22, 2010 6:30 pm
- Location: Vermont and Boston, MA
- Thanked: 1186 times
- Followed by:512 members
- GMAT Score:770
People can and do find success both ways. So whatever works best for you is fine. With that said, The CR Bible really is geared to the LSAT and can be a little confusing for the GMAT.
On the GMAT I believe you should read the question stem first.
When you do read the question stem there is really one thing that you are looking for -- does the stimulus (passage) have a conclusion?
Because the most important thing you can focus on in the stimulus is the conclusion it is important to know if there is in fact a conclusion in the stimulus.
If you find that you have a strengthen, weaken, bold-faced, method of reasoning, etc. then you do have a conclusion in the stimulus.
If you have an inference/conclusion question or a paradox question you should not be looking for a conclusion in the stimulus.
So both things are partially right. You should read the question stem first, but you do not want to be too focused on what you are trying to do as you read the stimulus. Pay attention to the stimulus and really just focus on identifying the conclusion - which is after all the most important thing.
On the GMAT I believe you should read the question stem first.
When you do read the question stem there is really one thing that you are looking for -- does the stimulus (passage) have a conclusion?
Because the most important thing you can focus on in the stimulus is the conclusion it is important to know if there is in fact a conclusion in the stimulus.
If you find that you have a strengthen, weaken, bold-faced, method of reasoning, etc. then you do have a conclusion in the stimulus.
If you have an inference/conclusion question or a paradox question you should not be looking for a conclusion in the stimulus.
So both things are partially right. You should read the question stem first, but you do not want to be too focused on what you are trying to do as you read the stimulus. Pay attention to the stimulus and really just focus on identifying the conclusion - which is after all the most important thing.
- Tani
- Legendary Member
- Posts: 1255
- Joined: Fri Nov 07, 2008 2:08 pm
- Location: St. Louis
- Thanked: 312 times
- Followed by:90 members
You may be confusing critical reasoning and reading comprehension.
In critical reasoning you need to read the stem first so you know what you are looking for. If you read the question after you read the stimulus you will have to go back and re-read to find the specific answer...a waste of time.
In reading comprehension, you are dealing with five to eight questions relative to a passage. Most people cannot hold all those questions in their head and still read the passage efficiently or effectively. You are better served to read the passage strategically, building a clear understanding of the topic scope and purpose and noting where in the passage you can find the relevant information once you attack the questions.
In critical reasoning you need to read the stem first so you know what you are looking for. If you read the question after you read the stimulus you will have to go back and re-read to find the specific answer...a waste of time.
In reading comprehension, you are dealing with five to eight questions relative to a passage. Most people cannot hold all those questions in their head and still read the passage efficiently or effectively. You are better served to read the passage strategically, building a clear understanding of the topic scope and purpose and noting where in the passage you can find the relevant information once you attack the questions.
Tani Wolff