I need help!
If x and y are positive, is 4x>3y?
1. x>y-x
2. x/y<1
I get how the two statements alone are not sufficient but how about together??
this is what i did so far:
1. x>y-x becomes 2x>y some values that satisfy this are x=1, y=1....x=2, y=3.... x=3, y =5
putting these values in 4x>3y gives true/false statements....2>1 yes......8>9...no..12>15..no
so insufficient
2. since x, >0 x/y <1 becomes x<y
values of x,y that satisfy this are...4,2...6,1...3,4
putting these in 4x>3y
we get Y/N statements agn.....16>6 yes.....24>3 yes.....12>12...no
so insufficient
BUT together...i'm not sure how to combine the two statements:
2x>y & x<y to see if 4x> 3y
What do i do??? It would take me forever to find values to satisfy both stat 1 & 2 and then to check if any of the values give a consistent answer for 4x>3y. Is there a shortcut that i'm missing?????
Also another issue related to this i have is that i never know which "trial" values to pick. I tend to start with small positive no.s then i try higher positive no.s then if the question allows i'll plug in negative values or fractions.
my question is how do i speed up this process? any tips on plug-in values would be greatly appreciated! thanks
if x and y are positive , is 4x>3y?
This topic has expert replies
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:20 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:1100
- Rich@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:57 pm
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 76 times
- Followed by:17 members
- GMAT Score:770
>>>
Last edited by Rich@VeritasPrep on Sat Jun 12, 2010 9:33 am, edited 1 time in total.
Rich Zwelling
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
-
- Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
- Posts: 124
- Joined: Wed May 19, 2010 10:20 pm
- Thanked: 3 times
- GMAT Score:1100
Thanks Raz1024!raz1024 wrote:Hey Mitz (?),
Nice job in getting everything down to 2x>y & x<y.
Combining those two statements, you can form a single inequality:
x<y<2x
Now, you're interested in 3y, according to the prompt, so multiply everything by 3:
3x<3y<4x. ! shouldnt this be 6x ?
You know from this inequality that 3y is less than 4x, and thus 4x>3y. SUFFICIENT.
As for plugging in values, it looks like you did just fine. Your strategy of starting with smaller numbers is exactly what should be done, because it keeps everything simple.
You could also think about it strictly in terms of the algebra:
(1) tells you that 2x>y, which means 4x>2y. Does that mean 4x>3y? Not necessarily.
(2) tells you x<y, which means 4x<4y. Does that mean 4x>3y? Not necessarily.
Ok, so you're saying...
given 2x>y & x<y
we get x<y<2x
since we want to know the answer in relation 3y, multiply all by 3 so we get
3x<3y<6x
so since 6x>3y ....4x must be greater than 3y... correct?
BUT ! there's an issue. the answer provided is E not C. So maybe there's a flaw in there somewhere...?!
- Rich@VeritasPrep
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 147
- Joined: Tue Aug 25, 2009 7:57 pm
- Location: New York City
- Thanked: 76 times
- Followed by:17 members
- GMAT Score:770
The answer is indeed E...why? Because sometimes even instructors make silly mistakes
Nice job catching the error from yours truly!
So, the lesson here? Be careful with your calculations. Although at this point, my saying that is like the pot and the kettle. Do as I say, not as I do
Nice job catching the error from yours truly!
So, the lesson here? Be careful with your calculations. Although at this point, my saying that is like the pot and the kettle. Do as I say, not as I do
Rich Zwelling
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
GMAT Instructor, Veritas Prep
- sanju09
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 3650
- Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 4:27 am
- Location: India
- Thanked: 267 times
- Followed by:80 members
- GMAT Score:760
This famous saying must have been invented by a GMAT instructor only, very entertaining.raz1024 wrote:The answer is indeed E...why? Because sometimes even instructors make silly mistakes
Nice job catching the error from yours truly!
So, the lesson here? Be careful with your calculations. Although at this point, my saying that is like the pot and the kettle. Do as I say, not as I do
The mind is everything. What you think you become. -Lord Buddha
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
Sanjeev K Saxena
Quantitative Instructor
The Princeton Review - Manya Abroad
Lucknow-226001
www.manyagroup.com
- Geva@EconomistGMAT
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 905
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 1:38 am
- Thanked: 378 times
- Followed by:123 members
- GMAT Score:760
It won't take forever if you think about the concepts behind the plug ins. At this point, you are trying to show that 4x can be both greater and smaller than 3y, while satisfying both statements. You know that 2x is greater than y, but y is greater than x. So let's first try with an x and y that are very close to each other: x=1 and y=1.1, so that 2x=2 is greater than y=1.1.mitzwillrockgmat wrote:I need help!
2x>y & x<y to see if 4x> 3y
What do i do??? It would take me forever to find values to satisfy both stat 1 & 2 and then to check if any of the values give a consistent answer for 4x>3y. Is there a shortcut that i'm missing?????
Also another issue related to this i have is that i never know which "trial" values to pick. I tend to start with small positive no.s then i try higher positive no.s then if the question allows i'll plug in negative values or fractions.
my question is how do i speed up this process? any tips on plug-in values would be greatly appreciated! thanks
in this case, 4x=4 is greater than 3y=3.3, so we have a yes.
Now think: Can we have a "no", preferably without reinventing the wheel altogether?
Keep x as 1, so that 4x is still 4. All we need is a y that is great enough to pass 3y>4: y=1.5 would work, and still satisfy the requirement of 2x>y.
Take home messages:
1) plug in with direction, not blindly: plug in one set, see what answer you get, then think about which plug in will get you the opposite answer.
2) When plugging in a second time for more than one value, keep one and play with the other.
- Karishma BL
- Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
- Posts: 8
- Joined: Wed Nov 10, 2010 11:43 am
- Location: Pune, India
You can also solve this question graphically as I have discussed on the Veritas blog here:
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... -part-iii/
https://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2011/0 ... -part-iii/
mitzwillrockgmat wrote:I need help!
If x and y are positive, is 4x>3y?
1. x>y-x
2. x/y<1
I get how the two statements alone are not sufficient but how about together??
this is what i did so far:
1. x>y-x becomes 2x>y some values that satisfy this are x=1, y=1....x=2, y=3.... x=3, y =5
putting these values in 4x>3y gives true/false statements....2>1 yes......8>9...no..12>15..no
so insufficient
2. since x, >0 x/y <1 becomes x<y
values of x,y that satisfy this are...4,2...6,1...3,4
putting these in 4x>3y
we get Y/N statements agn.....16>6 yes.....24>3 yes.....12>12...no
so insufficient
BUT together...i'm not sure how to combine the two statements:
2x>y & x<y to see if 4x> 3y
What do i do??? It would take me forever to find values to satisfy both stat 1 & 2 and then to check if any of the values give a consistent answer for 4x>3y. Is there a shortcut that i'm missing?????
Also another issue related to this i have is that i never know which "trial" values to pick. I tend to start with small positive no.s then i try higher positive no.s then if the question allows i'll plug in negative values or fractions.
my question is how do i speed up this process? any tips on plug-in values would be greatly appreciated! thanks
- GMATGuruNY
- GMAT Instructor
- Posts: 15539
- Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
- Location: New York, NY
- Thanked: 13060 times
- Followed by:1906 members
- GMAT Score:790
Since y is POSITIVE, the inequalities can safely be divided by y.mitzwillrockgmat wrote:I need help!
If x and y are positive, is 4x>3y?
1. x>y-x
2. x/y<1
4x > 3y
x > (3/4)y
x/y > 3/4
Question stem, rephrased:
Is x/y > 3/4?
Statement 1:
x > y-x
2x > y
2(x/y) > 1
x/y > 1/2
Case 1: x/y = 2/3
In this case, x/y < 3/4, so the answer to the rephrased question stem is NO.
Case 2: x/y = 9/10
In this case, x/y > 3/4, so the answer to the rephrased question stem is YES.
Since the answer is NO in Case 1 but YES in Case 2, INSUFFICIENT.
Cases 1 and 2 satisfy BOTH statements.
Since the answer is NO in Case 1 but YES in Case 2, the two statements combined are INSUFFICIENT.
The correct answer is E.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.
As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.
For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3