Economic Indicators

This topic has expert replies
Legendary Member
Posts: 727
Joined: Sun Jun 08, 2008 9:32 pm
Thanked: 8 times
Followed by:1 members

Economic Indicators

by umaa » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:21 am
As a result of surging economic indicators, most analysts upgraded thre company's stock to a strong "buy" ignoring the advice of the head of a watchdog organization who warned that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but ineffective in the long run.

A. who warned that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but

B. warning that the company's product would prove not only dangerous and also

C. Warning that the company's product would prove itself to be both dangerous and

D who warned that the company's product would prove to be both dangerous and

E. who was warning that the company's product would prove not only dangerous but

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:36 am
In these type of Questions I am not able to understand what "who" modifies...

does it try to modify "organisation"


or "head of X"...
here "of X" acts as middlemen...

can someone please help

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 33
Joined: Sun May 03, 2009 7:12 am
Thanked: 6 times

by btg760 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:47 am
My stakes are on (D).

What is the source of the question? and what is OA?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:50 am
Can't decide between A and D....

Both look equally good....

A = not only X but [also] Y
D = both X and Y.

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 166
Joined: Sat Apr 18, 2009 10:41 pm
Thanked: 9 times
GMAT Score:770

by raghavsarathy » Wed Jul 01, 2009 5:53 pm
Hi Mohit. After looking at your post I am a litte confused..

I have seen many questions in which answer choices that partially fulfilled the [not only... but also ] construction were eliminated. You are considering A even though [also] is missing.. Is that allowed ?

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 158
Joined: Tue Sep 30, 2008 8:47 am
Thanked: 23 times
Followed by:1 members
GMAT Score:660

by DeepakR » Wed Jul 01, 2009 6:11 pm
Hi Mohit,

The Idiom is Not only but also. So A, B and E are ruled out and I would go with D. Itself in C seems to be redundant.

-Deepak

User avatar
Legendary Member
Posts: 575
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2008 2:58 am
Location: India
Thanked: 18 times
Followed by:4 members
GMAT Score:710

by rahulg83 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:20 pm
goelmohit2002 wrote:In these type of Questions I am not able to understand what "who" modifies...

does it try to modify "organisation"


or "head of X"...
here "of X" acts as middlemen...

can someone please help
Hey, head of the organization who...
who clearly modifies head here, because it's a preposition phrase 'of' and noun after preposition can't be subject of the sentence.
Anyways my pick is D.
Although you are right, sometimes GMAT uses 'not only, but' idiom...a bit tricky
But when we have two grammatically correct choice, better pick one, which you are absolutely sure of. IMO D is best here.
Anyways whats the OA??

Legendary Member
Posts: 2467
Joined: Thu Aug 28, 2008 6:14 pm
Thanked: 331 times
Followed by:11 members

by cramya » Wed Jul 01, 2009 8:31 pm
IMO D looks the best

upgraded
warned
both x and y idiom correctly used here

I could be mistaken here but IMO "had warned" would have been more apropriate since we are talking about 2 past actions where the warning preceeded the upgrade.

Regards,
CR

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:35 pm
raghavsarathy wrote:Hi Mohit. After looking at your post I am a litte confused..

I have seen many questions in which answer choices that partially fulfilled the [not only... but also ] construction were eliminated. You are considering A even though [also] is missing.. Is that allowed ?
Yes GMAT considers both to be correct

1. Not only X....but Y
2. Not only X....but also Y.

There are couple of examples of the same in OG-10. So it is similar to not X but [rather] Y.

OG says it is preferable to have not only...but also...complete...if there is a option between "not only....but also" and "not only....but".

But grammatically both are liked by GMAT.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Wed Jul 01, 2009 10:42 pm
rahulg83 wrote: because it's a preposition phrase 'of' and noun after preposition can't be subject of the sentence.
Thanks Rahul,

Can you please tell a bit more about this rule....how does this subject etc....changes the equation.

Please help.

Thanks
Mohit

Junior | Next Rank: 30 Posts
Posts: 22
Joined: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:31 am
Location: Bangalore
GMAT Score:730

by nikhilgirdhar » Thu Jul 02, 2009 12:42 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
raghavsarathy wrote:Hi Mohit. After looking at your post I am a litte confused..

I have seen many questions in which answer choices that partially fulfilled the [not only... but also ] construction were eliminated. You are considering A even though [also] is missing.. Is that allowed ?
Yes GMAT considers both to be correct

1. Not only X....but Y
2. Not only X....but also Y.

There are couple of examples of the same in OG-10. So it is similar to not X but [rather] Y.

OG says it is preferable to have not only...but also...complete...if there is a option between "not only....but also" and "not only....but".

But grammatically both are liked by GMAT.
Not only X but Y I is idiomatically incorrect on GMAT
the correct idioms are:

Not X but Y
Not only X but also Y

XY parallelism hast to be maintained.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Thu Jul 02, 2009 1:18 am
nikhilgirdhar wrote: Not only X but Y I is idiomatically incorrect on GMAT
the correct idioms are:

Not X but Y
Not only X but also Y

XY parallelism hast to be maintained.
IMO
Not only X but [also] Y.

is correct idiom that is liked by GMAT....

Please see the Q#216 and Q#241 of OG-10.....

In the explanations of these questions....OG mentions that not only X but [also] Y is the correct idiom...

also is optional here.....but it is preferable to have...as per OG.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:42 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by mittalashwani13 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 6:25 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
nikhilgirdhar wrote: Not only X but Y I is idiomatically incorrect on GMAT
the correct idioms are:

Not X but Y
Not only X but also Y

XY parallelism hast to be maintained.
IMO
Not only X but [also] Y.

is correct idiom that is liked by GMAT....

Please see the Q#216 and Q#241 of OG-10.....

In the explanations of these questions....OG mentions that not only X but [also] Y is the correct idiom...

also is optional here.....but it is preferable to have...as per OG.

Mohit - Could you please provide me ONE Official problem where OA is with the construction "Not only X but [also] Y ?

Legendary Member
Posts: 1799
Joined: Wed Dec 24, 2008 3:03 am
Thanked: 36 times
Followed by:2 members

by goelmohit2002 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 7:09 am
mittalashwani13 wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:
nikhilgirdhar wrote: Not only X but Y I is idiomatically incorrect on GMAT
the correct idioms are:

Not X but Y
Not only X but also Y

XY parallelism hast to be maintained.
IMO
Not only X but [also] Y.

is correct idiom that is liked by GMAT....

Please see the Q#216 and Q#241 of OG-10.....

In the explanations of these questions....OG mentions that not only X but [also] Y is the correct idiom...

also is optional here.....but it is preferable to have...as per OG.

Mohit - Could you please provide me ONE Official problem where OA is with the construction "Not only X but [also] Y ?
As far as I know the OA were all having not only...but also both...

But the explantion of Q#216 and Q#241 in OG says that the options that were not having "also" are kicked out not because of "also" not present....but because of other errors that GMAT do not like...

So what I interpret from OG is that not only...but [also] is correct idiom....

Kaplan also say that "also" is optional.

Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 72
Joined: Tue Jun 09, 2009 4:42 pm
Thanked: 3 times

by mittalashwani13 » Fri Jul 03, 2009 10:39 am
goelmohit2002 wrote:
mittalashwani13 wrote:
goelmohit2002 wrote:
nikhilgirdhar wrote: Not only X but Y I is idiomatically incorrect on GMAT
the correct idioms are:

Not X but Y
Not only X but also Y

XY parallelism hast to be maintained.
IMO
Not only X but [also] Y.

is correct idiom that is liked by GMAT....

Please see the Q#216 and Q#241 of OG-10.....

In the explanations of these questions....OG mentions that not only X but [also] Y is the correct idiom...

also is optional here.....but it is preferable to have...as per OG.

Mohit - Could you please provide me ONE Official problem where OA is with the construction "Not only X but [also] Y ?
As far as I know the OA were all having not only...but also both...

But the explantion of Q#216 and Q#241 in OG says that the options that were not having "also" are kicked out not because of "also" not present....but because of other errors that GMAT do not like...

So what I interpret from OG is that not only...but [also] is correct idiom....

Kaplan also say that "also" is optional.

Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.
OG says only in the explanation of #241 that not only ...but also is preferable over not only ...but [also] ....but i never saw a single problem where i can found not only ...but [also] is deemed correct...

But ...It is a matter of caution ...because on the Standard English,

Not only ...but [also] is correct ...also you can use synonym for "also" such as "as well" , "too" etc...

Not Only ...[but] also is also correct ...

And and and...

Not only ... is also correct in some of the cases ...

BUT AS FAR AS GMAT is Concerned ....GMAT never tested the incomplete idiom. GMAT always tested Not only ...but also construction...
Last edited by mittalashwani13 on Fri Jul 03, 2009 11:44 am, edited 1 time in total.