Lawmaker

This topic has expert replies
Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 228
Joined: Sun Aug 17, 2008 8:08 am
Thanked: 4 times

Lawmaker

by jainrahul1985 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:08 am
Lawmaker: Raising taxes is not the only means of reducing government
debt. The government's stockpile of helium is worth 25 percent more,
at current market prices, than the debt accumulated in acquiring and
storing it. Therefore, by selling the helium, the government can not
only pay off that debt but reduce its overall debt as well.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The government has no current need for helium.
B. Twenty-five percent of the debt the government has accumulated in
Stockpiling helium is not an insignificant portion of the government's
Total debt.
C. It is not in the lawmaker's interest to advocate raising taxes as a
Means of reducing government debt.
D. Attempts to sell the government's helium will not depress the market
Price of helium by more than 25 percent.
E. The government will not incur any costs in closing its facilities for
stockpiling helium.

[spoiler]
I chose A but that's not the OA . Please suggest[/spoiler]

Master | Next Rank: 500 Posts
Posts: 191
Joined: Sat Jun 26, 2010 9:27 am
Thanked: 6 times
Followed by:2 members

by ashish2104 » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:12 am
D seems a better choice than A. Since conclusion is about recovering debt. So it is presupposed that government has no need for helium now.

Negate D, ie if the price of helium does fall below 25% then it will actually be cheaper and there would be loss for the government.

Hence,D

Senior | Next Rank: 100 Posts
Posts: 92
Joined: Tue Jul 20, 2010 6:56 am
Thanked: 4 times

by abhigang » Sat Aug 28, 2010 7:04 am
jainrahul1985 wrote:Lawmaker: Raising taxes is not the only means of reducing government
debt. The government's stockpile of helium is worth 25 percent more,
at current market prices, than the debt accumulated in acquiring and
storing it. Therefore, by selling the helium, the government can not
only pay off that debt but reduce its overall debt as well.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The government has no current need for helium.
B. Twenty-five percent of the debt the government has accumulated in
Stockpiling helium is not an insignificant portion of the government's
Total debt.
C. It is not in the lawmaker's interest to advocate raising taxes as a
Means of reducing government debt.
D. Attempts to sell the government's helium will not depress the market
Price of helium by more than 25 percent.
E. The government will not incur any costs in closing its facilities for
stockpiling helium.

[spoiler]
I chose A but that's not the OA . Please suggest[/spoiler]
IMO D.

Legendary Member
Posts: 1119
Joined: Fri May 07, 2010 8:50 am
Thanked: 29 times
Followed by:3 members

by diebeatsthegmat » Sat Aug 28, 2010 6:24 pm
jainrahul1985 wrote:Lawmaker: Raising taxes is not the only means of reducing government
debt. The government's stockpile of helium is worth 25 percent more,
at current market prices, than the debt accumulated in acquiring and
storing it. Therefore, by selling the helium, the government can not
only pay off that debt but reduce its overall debt as well.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
A. The government has no current need for helium.
B. Twenty-five percent of the debt the government has accumulated in
Stockpiling helium is not an insignificant portion of the government's
Total debt.
C. It is not in the lawmaker's interest to advocate raising taxes as a
Means of reducing government debt.
D. Attempts to sell the government's helium will not depress the market
Price of helium by more than 25 percent.
E. The government will not incur any costs in closing its facilities for
stockpiling helium.

[spoiler]
I chose A but that's not the OA . Please suggest[/spoiler]
D here too