no comprendo OG 11 (2/3)

This topic has expert replies
Newbie | Next Rank: 10 Posts
Posts: 5
Joined: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:29 am

no comprendo OG 11 (2/3)

by baguette82 » Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:54 am
Hi

I have problems with three questions. This is the second of three related posts. I would appreciate your help in any! Thanks.

I'm having some difficulties understanding Q144 of the Official Guide 11 in Data Sufficiency (page 335).
Question goes something like this:
144. If n is a positive integer, is (1/10)^n < 0.01 ?
(i) n > 2
(ii) (1/10)^(n-1) < 0.1
The correct answer is supposedly D [each statement alone is sufficient]

statement (i) is not a problem. I get it why it is sufficient.
statement (ii), however, is said to be sufficient because we can determine that the expression holds true for n>2.

Nonetheless, I would have said insufficient, because there are two values of n (n=1, 2), for which the expression is false and no information is given that these values are excluded. We therefore, in my reasoning, have insufficient information as it holds true in some cases, and holds false in others.

Can someone expain the OG reasoning please?

Thanks!

Legendary Member
Posts: 544
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:14 am
Location: Pune, India
Thanked: 31 times
Followed by:2 members

by adi_800 » Sat Aug 07, 2010 11:10 am
take 10^(n-1) to RHS and you will come to know why n > 2...

User avatar
GMAT Instructor
Posts: 15539
Joined: Tue May 25, 2010 12:04 pm
Location: New York, NY
Thanked: 13060 times
Followed by:1906 members
GMAT Score:790

by GMATGuruNY » Sat Aug 07, 2010 2:12 pm
baguette82 wrote:Hi

I have problems with three questions. This is the second of three related posts. I would appreciate your help in any! Thanks.

I'm having some difficulties understanding Q144 of the Official Guide 11 in Data Sufficiency (page 335).
Question goes something like this:
144. If n is a positive integer, is (1/10)^n < 0.01 ?
(i) n > 2
(ii) (1/10)^(n-1) < 0.1
The correct answer is supposedly D [each statement alone is sufficient]

statement (i) is not a problem. I get it why it is sufficient.
statement (ii), however, is said to be sufficient because we can determine that the expression holds true for n>2.

Nonetheless, I would have said insufficient, because there are two values of n (n=1, 2), for which the expression is false and no information is given that these values are excluded. We therefore, in my reasoning, have insufficient information as it holds true in some cases, and holds false in others.

Can someone expain the OG reasoning please?

Thanks!
Rewrite the question:

Is (1/10)^n < (1/10)^2?

Or more simply: Is n>2?

Statement 1:
Tell us outright that n>2. Sufficient.

Statement 2:
If (1/10)^(n-1) < 1/10, the smallest positive integer that works is n=3:
(1/10)^(3-1) < 1/10
(1/10)^2 < 1/10
1/100 < 1/10
So n>2. Sufficient.

The correct answer is D.
Private tutor exclusively for the GMAT and GRE, with over 20 years of experience.
Followed here and elsewhere by over 1900 test-takers.
I have worked with students based in the US, Australia, Taiwan, China, Tajikistan, Kuwait, Saudi Arabia -- a long list of countries.
My students have been admitted to HBS, CBS, Tuck, Yale, Stern, Fuqua -- a long list of top programs.

As a tutor, I don't simply teach you how I would approach problems.
I unlock the best way for YOU to solve problems.

For more information, please email me (Mitch Hunt) at [email protected].
Student Review #1
Student Review #2
Student Review #3